How did the Classical Scholars View the Shia?

[Aurelian]

before anyone starts with the "if you criticize the Shia- that means you're a Saudi-Wahhabi-Zionist-Madkhali!"- let me just mention that most of these fataawa I have with me predate every single one of those concepts. u tell me if u want to call Imam Malik a Zionist agent.

and if Iran really fought the zionists... yeah I'd be for it but I don't believe it's ever going to happen and I'm not duped by Iran's fakery. anyways... what I'm fed up with is I'm fed up with ppl promoting Shi'ism. if ppl started calling anyone a "Zionist-Wahhabi-Madkhali-Saudi" who criticizes Hinduism- I'd be bothered by that. so it bothers me when ppl go against basic aqeedah (you have a serious aqeedah issue if your wala and bara are for the sake of supporting 12er kaffirs) and do that when it comes to shi'ism. enough of my words, let's see what classical scholars say:

View attachment 324659

View attachment 324660

View attachment 324661

You don't need to be a Wahabbi to debunk and ridicule the Shia and their weird definition of Ali and sanctifying his lineage.