Current map showing military situation in Central Somalia.
- Thread starter geeljre49
- Start date
IKHALIIL
Suldhaanka
And bombers, have you seen what it did to the syrian rebels
Syrian rebels were only pushed back after Russian intervention. Assad's SAA was and still is powerless.And bombers, have you seen what it did to the syrian rebels
Establish a good blockade, nothing goes in there and nothing comes out.
Next one should be reconciliation. Clans in that area prefer AS due to perceived threat from other qabiils. Enflaming these tensions are men like Kabakutukade and other prominent leaders/commanders. FGS should drone strike these vermin.
Drones in general should be liberally used.
Next one should be reconciliation. Clans in that area prefer AS due to perceived threat from other qabiils. Enflaming these tensions are men like Kabakutukade and other prominent leaders/commanders. FGS should drone strike these vermin.
Drones in general should be liberally used.
It would be great if they gave clans that side with AS a amnesty period. Giving people a way out of a situation means they won't be willing to lay their life down when boxed in. All of this is of course the duty of the MoD and commanders, there needs to be a clear agreed upon plan moving forward to deal with the remnants in central Somalia before focusing on the south.
Dalac Bilaash
β Emperor of The Horn β
It seems you're new to politics He is the only one that cleaned them from entire Regions ever since Sheikh Sharif left with only Mogadishu Under Government control in 2012
Internet Nomad
βͺππ€π€π§π’πππππ£πβͺ
What are some of the political implications of requesting USA to drop a nuclear bomb on AS territory?
Ashraf
ππ«π πππ π ππππππΈπ΄πͺ½
βKAAAFIRβ haji Dabascar voice
Ashraf
ππ«π πππ π ππππππΈπ΄πͺ½
Nah but seriously if the US carpet bombed the whole area it would raise a lot of domestic hostility towards the US even if they got rid of al kebab. Such an air campaign would cost a lot of civilian lives. Considering that the wound of black hawk down is still fresh and weβre western aligned now it would create a scenario where after they got rid of al kebab. Due to public outrage and animosity the government would be forced to switch to China. I donβt even think the US would be down to do that. Itβs expensive and thereβs a lot at stake in the region they donβt wanna risk losing a major ally in a place where they donβt have many. From a US foreign policy point of view, it wouldnβt be effective, I can only imagine it happening under trump and instead of an air campaign it would just be a massive drone one. Summary the US would be demonised in the eyes of the somali public, low chance of Congress approval. Not beneficial to US foreign policy. Too risky, incompetence within SNA for a ground assault after an air campaign. US has bigger problems to deal with. Etc
Bombing Shabab alone won't fix things. You guys still need to remember that Al-Shabab has influence in Mogadishu and has spies everywhere hence why they are able to collect taxes from Xamar. I even heard some Al-Shabab members are in the government. Rooting out corruption and removing Al-Shabab internally is a must
Drones or bombers wonβt solve anything, as long as the political causes of the war exist they can find recruits and new base areas and they make millions from taxationβs. In fact indiscriminate bombing might make it all worse.
Says, first the Somali government and its relationship to its population needs to be fixed.
Yes, they just destroyed cities but the spirit were still high.And bombers, have you seen what it did to the syrian rebels
This is one of the effects, not Ai generated
