Steamdevolopment
VIP
Imagine if you found a case like this on your docket. A vicious crime committed, you have the choice of choosing it as unified crime by a people or treat it as different cases and the work of "clans".
The prosecution will argue that a people with same religion, traditions, skin color and physical traits should be treated as a one great crime, with as great punishment
The defense argues that a group of people who organize around clans, and not larger structures and whom acts with greater callus to their fellow similar man than they do foreigners should be considered a collection of clans, and not a people. He add that since the group can't depend on its larger structure, but only the smaller clans, that it can't be considered a people.
The prosecution will argue that a people with same religion, traditions, skin color and physical traits should be treated as a one great crime, with as great punishment
The defense argues that a group of people who organize around clans, and not larger structures and whom acts with greater callus to their fellow similar man than they do foreigners should be considered a collection of clans, and not a people. He add that since the group can't depend on its larger structure, but only the smaller clans, that it can't be considered a people.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Last edited: