Do you prefer IS/Al Shabab rule or Western style secular democracy rule in the Somali regions?

Which do you prefer back home?

  • Al Shabab/IS rule

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • Western style secular democracy

    Votes: 9 90.0%

  • Total voters
    10
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think all Somalis in the West prefer Western style democracy otherwise they would have went to Al Shabab controlled areas or Raqqa years ago. If they vote Al Shabab/IS, they are hypocrites.
 

Figo

|Garowe|Jalam|Galkacyo|
VIP
I've already said what my preferred rule of law is numerous times here. I ain't going to repeat myself.:kobeok:
 
Kemal Ataturk styled Somalia will be my dream. Authoritarian Secular One party state build on Nationalism and progressive ideas.With a strong man leading the republic.
 
Living in the west has made more religious Alhamdulillah. AS would make me want to rebel and I would
miss certain vices I enjoy outchea
 

CrazyWadaad

Prince of East Africa
I don't know about Somalia but I would like Somaliland be turned into an Islamic Republic.With a Grand Mufti as the spiritual leader basically a Sunni version of the Iranian System.Democracy+Sharia=Heavenon Earth. Watch this video about Islamic republics
 

Apollo

VIP
The Singaporean and Chinese model would be the best for Somalia.

State Capitalism by technocrats with strict anti-corruption rules. No elections.

Democracy is a Western social construct. It not a natural law that all sociaties must obey to. It won't work in Somalia.
 

CrazyWadaad

Prince of East Africa
The Singaporean and Chinese model would be the best for Somalia.

State Capitalism by technocrats with strict anti-corruption rules. No elections.

Democracy is a Western social construct. It not a natural law that all sociaties must obey to. It won't work in Somalia.
Ofcourse democracy can't work in your Somalia.Your minds are still stuck 16th century
 

Apollo

VIP
Ofcourse democracy can't work in your Somalia.Your minds are still stuck 16th century

It is applicable to all poor countries. You can't have an effective government that can lift the people out of poverty when they are going to vote for far-left socialists/commies or manipulative strongmen.

So far of the regimes in third world countries, I like the Chinese-Singaporean model the most. No democracy, but a lot of progress.
 
Stupid thread. The west would never allow us to mass migrate to any hypothetical Islamic state so there is no "hypocrisy". Even if Shabab are khariji najdi innovators it is is still a clear choice between Iman and kufr.

I take solace in the fact the people of Somalis will never accept the kufr of " secular western democracy" and a handful of lost murtadeen western stooges will never change that.
 

CrazyWadaad

Prince of East Africa
It is applicable to all poor countries. You can't have an effective government that can lift the people out of poverty when they are going to vote for far-left socialists/commies or manipulative strongmen.

So far of the regimes in third world countries, I like the Chinese-Singaporean model the most. No democracy, but a lot of progress.
Many third countries have economically risen even with having democracy as a system.South Korea,Malaysia,Hong Kong etc
 

Apollo

VIP
Many third countries have economically risen even with having democracy as a system.South Korea,Malaysia,Hong Kong etc

Yeah, South Korea used to be a dictatorship during its boom years and after they became wealthy switched over to democracy. That's the better way to do things rather than go directly all in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top