Ethiopia has forced SouthWest State president Sharif Hassan to quit the race for Villa Somalia.
Maxaa ka soo baxay shirkii Addis Ababa? (Warbixin)
by mahad | Sunday, Dec 25, 2016 | 13901 views
December 25(Jowhar)-Wararka ka imanaya dalka Itoobiya ayaa sheegaya in kulan labo maalmood socday oo ka dhacay magaalada Addis Ababa una dhexeeyay madaxweynayaasha Maamul goboleedyada Koofurgalbeed, Galmudug iyo Hirshabeelle iyo mas’uuliyiin ka socotay wadamada Imaaraadka Carabta,Itoobiya iyo dalal kale uu ku aqbalay Madaxweynaha Koofurgalbeed Soomaaliya Shariif Xasan Shiikh Aadan inuu ka tanaasulo musharaxnimada doorashada Madaxweynaha Soomaaliya
Kulankan ka dhacay magaalada Addis Ababa ayaa wararka ay heleyso shabakada jowhar.com waxa ay sheegayaan in uu sidoo kale aqbalay Madaxweynaha Koofurgalbeed Soomaaliya Shariif Xasan Sheekh Aadan uu aqbalay in uu joojiyo ku taageerada mid kamid ah xildhibaanada baarlamaanka Soomaaliya Cabdirashiid Xiddig in uu noqdo guddoomiyaha baarlamaanka Soomaaliya.
Wararka ayaa waxa ay intaa ku darayaan in Madaxweyne Xasan Sheekh uu ballan qaaday Madaxweynaha Koofurgalbeed Soomaaliya Shariif Xasan laga tala geliyo xubnaha Koofur Galbeed ay ku yeelaneyso dowladda Federaalka oo uu ugu horeeyo Guddoomiyaha Baarlamaanka Federaalka ah.
Dowlada Itoobiya iyo dowladaha deriska la ah Soomaaliya ayaa isku xiray ammaanka Mandiqadda Geeska Afrika iyo in siyaasadda Soomaaliya laga ilaaliyo isbedel xilligan.
Madaxweynaha dowlad goboleedka Koofur Galbeed Soomaaliya Shariif Xasan Sheekh Aadan ayaa kulankan kadib u duulay dhulka barakeysan ee Makka si uu usoo guto Cimro, kadib bilo badan oo siyaasad adag uu ku jiray, halka labada madaxweyne ee Cabdikariin Xuseen Guuleed iyo Cali Cabdullaahi Cosoble ay u ambabaxeen Nairobi.
Koofur Galbeed Soomaaliya waxaa laga soo doortay 69 xildhibaan ee Aqalka Hoose iyo 8 Aqalka Sare ah (walow hadda lagu daray 3 xubnood oo dheeri ah) kuwan oo ah xubnaha ugu badan oo lagu soo doorto hal dowlad goboleed, taas ayaana muhiim ka dhigtay codadka xildhibaannada Koofur Galbeed iyo maamulka deegaankaas oo raadinayay isbedel dhanka awoodda siyaasadda ah oo suura gelin kara in mar uun masuul ka soo jeeda beelahaasi uu ku guuleysto xilalka Madaxweynaha iyo Ra’iisulwasaaraha.
Like it? Share it!
7
« Previous Story
Dagaal qasaare geystey oo ka dhacay deegaanka Xawaadley ee gobolka Sh/dhexe
Next Story »
Cumar C/rashiid oo la kulmay Xildhibaanada labada Aqal ee Jubbaland
More Related News
Guddoomiyaha Gobolka Banaadir oo baajiyay banaan bax saaka ka dhici lahaa Muqdisho
December 26 (Jowhar)— Banaan bax looga soo horjeeday xubnaha lagu daray Aqalka Sare ee laga qadiyay Gobolka Banaadir oo saaka lagu waday inuu ka dhaco magaalada Muqdisho...
Madaxweynaha Puntland oo beelo u qoondeeyay saddexdii kursi ee lagu kordhiyay Aqalka Sare
December 26 (Jowhar)— Madaxweynaha Puntland C/wali Maxamed Cali Gaas oo ka qeyb galay shirkii Madasha Wada-tashiga Qaran ee habeen hore laga soo saaray war murtiyeed...
Musharax Dr. Siciid C/llaahi oo la kulmay Bulshada ku nool Magaalada Muqdisho (Sawirro)
December 26 (Jowhar)— Musharax Dr.Siciid Cabdullaahi Deni oo ah Musharax u taagan Xilka Madaxweynaha Dowladda Federaalka Somaliya ayaa Casuumaad gaar ah u fidiyey qeybo...
Ciidamadda Kenya oo looga digay inay faragelin ku sameeyaan siyaasadda Soomaaliya
December 26 (Jowhar)—Taliyaha guud ciidamada Kenya ayaa digniin siiyay ciidamada dowladda Kenya ee ku sugan magaalada Kismaayo ee gobolka Jubbada Hoose iyo deegaanada...
Cumar C/rashiid oo la kulmay Xildhibaanada labada Aqal ee Jubbaland
December 26 (Jowhar)— Musharaxiinta u taagan xilka Madaxweynaha ayaa bilaabay xod-xodashada iyo kasbashada Xildhibaanada laga soo doortay gobolada, iyadoo Musharax walba...
Water Security” is herein described as the nexus between the availability,Walmart has leapfrogged Royal Dutch Shell as the world's largest company, topping the Fortune magazine Global 500 ranking accessibility and use of water. The concept is defined as the ‘availability of, and access to water in sufficient quantity and quality to meet livelihood needs of all households throughout the year, without considering the needs of other users. Water Security is further described herein under ‘Securing Water for Air France-KLM revised its yearly earnings forecast down from 2.5bn euros to between 2.2 and 2.3bnLast week, Laura Wade-Gery, who was head of M&S's online business, was promoted to oversee M&S's UK stores and some are tipping her to, one day, take over from Mr Bolland. euros.Production’. (Valerie Ndaruzaniye, 2011). While ‘Water Insecurity’ refers to the exact opposite of the mentioned concept that is been the unavailability and inaccessibility of enough water to meet the livelihood need of all households in a period of one yearIn the Horn of Africa, increasing scarcity and degradation of water sources seriously threatens human well-being. The population in the region (Ethiopia, Eritrea, Sudan, Djibouti, Somalia, Kenya and Uganda) has increased fourfold in the past 50 years and continues to grow rapidly (United Nations Population Division, 2010). Farmers need more water to feed more mouths and extended areas are needed for food production, at the expense of forest and pasture lands. With a high and stable number of pastoral communities and decreasing amount of pastureland, pressure on land and water grows. The mounting need for fertile soils and irrigated land is intensified by high international demands for food and energy. Investors from all over the world are ready to invest in commercial farming in Sudan, Kenya, Uganda and Ethiopia. With inadequate soil and water management measures being taken, this growing pressure on natural resources leads to a decrease in the quality and quantity of soils, forests and water resources. (Eric van de Giessen: 2011)To put this region into water security context, according to Earth Trends, Environmental Information/World Resources Institute, Djibouti’s per capita is 460M3; Eritrea’s per capita is 701M3; Ethiopia’s per capita is 1,666M3 and Somalia’s per capita is 628 M3 (IRWR, 2011). According to the Falkenmark Water Stress Indicator, a country or a region is said to experience “water stress” when annual water supplies drop below 1,700 cubic meters per person per year. This means almost all parts of the Horn of Africa region can generally be termed as water stress region or facing water insecurityFigure 1, Map of the Horn of Africa region (Yellow): Source: Google Map 2010It is in this context; this paper will be exploring the water scarcity and stress in the horn of Africa region and how this will increase the vulnerability of the households and farmers as well as the impact it will have on the ability of the locals to utilize their socio-economic potentials. The paper will further attempt to assess the capacity of the existing institutions to manage the task at hand and finally the author referring to his personal knowledge and experience in the area as well as the reflections of the articles reviewed will hopefully suggest possible strategies for all the concerned stakeholders.In this review article, the author will attempt to examine five peer-reviewed articles, some with specific regional details and others more general outlook on water security, and will then try to create a holistic picture on the water situation on the ground as well as the efforts of those in charge in trying to mitigate the challenges of water security and enhance greater socio-economic well being for their people. Here are the articles the author intends to review for this paper: 1:Valerie Ndaruzaniye (2011) Water security in Ethiopia, Risk and vulnerability assessment. 2: Eric van de Giessen (2011) Horn of Africa Environmental Security Assessment-Institute for Environmental Security. 3: Simbarashe Govere et.al (2010) Coping with Water Scarcity in Eastern Africa; the role of intra-regional virtual water trade. 4) Declan Conway, et.al (2008) Rainfall and Water Resources Variability in Sub-Saharan Africa during the Twentieth Century 5) Noah Amin (2007) Water Scarcity In The Horn Of Africa And Its Deadly Consequences.In this part, the discussion will be mainly centered on the major factors that are causing water stress and scarcity in Africa generally and in particular the Horn. Almost all the articles reviewed for this paper mainly agree the major cause of the water stress in the region, but as we will later discover it, there are few country specific challenges with greater regional water security significance to it.In Sub-Saharan Africa, the Eastern African region, particularly the Horn of Africa, is considered highly geographically exposed to climate change and its impact over water. Out of 200 million people living in the Horn of Africa, 70 million are located in areas prone to extreme droughts leading to water insecurity and food shortages. In this Eastern African region, floods and droughts can occur in the same area within a very short period. Such events can exacerbate inadequate water availability in quality and quantity, sufficient enough to sustain agricultural activities and energy production. As a result, this often leads to famine and widespread disruption of socio-The United States, seeing new hope for Somalia, will appoint a new ambassador to Mogadishu for the first time since closing its embassy there 23 years ago as the East African country descended into chaos, a senior U.S. government official said on Tuesday.Wendy Sherman, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, didn’t specify exactly when the ambassador would be named, but said it would be “soon.”There were hopeful signs of improvement in the security and economic conditions in the country, following years when Somalia had become “a synonym for chaos,” she said at the United States Institute of Peace think tank in Washington.“As a reflection both of our deepening relationship with the country and of our faith that better times are ahead, the president will propose the first U.S. ambassador to Somalia in more than two decades,” Sherman said.economic well beingA U.S. diplomat based in Nairobi, the capital of neighboring Kenya, who traveled sporadically to Mogadishu, has represented U.S. interests in Somalia. A State Department official said the new ambassador would not yet be based permanently in Mogadishu. Mentioning recent attacks in Somalia and neighboring Kenya by the al-Qaeda-affiliated militant group al Shabaab, Sherman said there was still a tough struggle to secure the country and rebuild its government, economy and infrastructure.“The path ahead remains rocky and uphill,” she said, adding that now was the best time in a quarter of a century to start realizing the post-independence hopes of the former Italian colony for peace and prosperity.Discussing the U.S. commitment to Somalia’s security, she said “a small contingent of U.S. military personnel, including some special operations forces, have been present in parts of Somalia for several years.”Their aim had been to work with Somali and African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) forces, providing information and advice on fighting al ShabaabSherman noted there had been a number of direct U.S. military strikes on militant targets, but didn’t specify whether they were drone strikesFrom time-to-time the U.S. military has conducted such action in Somalia against a limited number of targets who … have been determined to be part of al Qaedashe said.These may continue in the future if it was established that there was a “continuing imminent threat to U.S. persons.”. (Valerie Samsung is the world's biggest maker of mobile phones and the handset division accounts for the bulk of its profits.The South Korean firm said it "witnessed a slowdown in the overall smartphone market growth and saw increased competition in the Chinese and some European markets" during the period.Meanwhile, a stronger Korean currency also hurt Samsung's earnings during the period.The Korean won rose more than 11% against the US dollar and nearly 7% against the euro between July 2013 and end of June this year.A strengthening currency hurts profits of firms such as Samsung - which rely heavily on exports -More than half a century ago, Frantz Fanon made two pivotal observations about cataclysmic convulsions that would engulf Central and Eastern Africa. The first referred to his prescient observation that the African continent resembles a revolver, and Zaire is the trigger (Fanon, 1966 [2005]). His clairvoyant statement eerily prefigures what political commentators have, since the 1990s, characterized as the potential starting point of Africa’s First World War (Williams, 2013). After the overthrow of Mobutu Sese Seko, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly known as Zaire) became the site where warring armies from more than four neighboring countries came to battle one another, presumably to defend the legitimate existence of a proxy group in the country. Zimbabwean and Angolan forces were aligned with the regime of Laurent Kabila, while Rwanda and Uganda—the original patrons of Laurent Kabila and his putsch-were now his sworn enemies. Fanon’s second observation warned against the ramifications and implications of a Somali-Ethiopian war whose foundation was nationalistic (Fanon, 1969). This warning came with devastating consequences. The resulting political, social, and economic landscape of Somalia compels us to examine the contours of both the centripetal and centrifugal forces that still animate social upheavals. This requires a bold reexamination of analytic categories, and the ability to envision new ones to cope with the new reality. In this essay, I confine myself to the new reality in the Horn of Africa. I will engage in a comparative analysis by telescoping a panoramic view of regional history. This new telescoping and reality must be understood, not from the vantage point of national disintegration by way of political conflict, but through the perspective that social transformation and migration work as the ultimate engine of social change (Richerson and Boyd,Horn of Africa in FocusOn New Year’s Eve 1991, the entire Somali state collapsed, and the people of Somalia began the last decade of the twentieth century mourning, instead of celebrating, the onset of a new millennium. To be sure, this kind of political conflict is not confined to Somalia; it remains a significant feature of the region. The Horn of Africa, which encompasses Djibouti, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Kenya, South Sudan, Somalia, Sudan, and Uganda, is one of, if not the most conflict-prone zones in the world. Several interlocking conflict clusters exist in the region. The first involves the long-standing civil strife in South Sudan, which extends into Uganda and Chad. The second centers around the complicated network of conflicts that link Djibouti, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Somalia, and Kenya (Prendergast and Thomas-Jensen, 2007). Each country is characterized by complicated and interlocked internal social and economic conflicts. Over the past three decades, every country in the region except Kenya has experienced a contextaltering social conflict. Since the overthrow of Emperor Haile Selassie by the Derge in the early 1970s, Ethiopia has undergone radical social transformations. Once considered a cohesive Christian nation surrounded by an ocean of hostile Muslim populations, Ethiopia’s manufactured and official narrative, by the 1970s, rapidly morphed into an internally conflicted nation with multiple identities, voices, and contested narratives. Eritrea’s independence honeymoon is on the brink of becoming a nightmare with various ethnic and religious demarcation lines and conflicts. After a protracted civil war, South Sudan seceded from Sudan to become the newest member of the African Union. Within a year of declaring its independence, however, South Sudan descended into political chaos. Somalia, the supposedly most homogeneous country on the continent, has shown that homogeneity, even if it were empirically true, is not an indication of political stability. Even Kenya, the region’s most economically and politically stable country, is facing a legitimization crisis (Habermas, 1973), as are many other countries in the region.What is more problematic is the apparent inability of much of the scholarship in the region, particularly Somali scholarship, to comprehend and contextualize the ever-expanding violence and the resultant dissolution of the nation-state. This is partly because the outlook of both Somali scholarship and Somali society has generally remained provincial, unable to theoretically and methodologically locate the Somali condition within the larger social, political, and demographic contexts of the region and the world. Somali scholarship suffers from what I consider to be an “ostrich syndrome.” By ostrich syndrome, I mean a symptom that some people exhibit or manifest when they are confronted by confounding and conflicting social, political, or controversial issues in their lives. Instead of confronting the issues, such people would rather ignore them or, as ostriches do, bury their head in the sand, hoping that the threat will go away. This is why current Somali scholarship is obsessed with everyday dynamics–Al-Shabab versus the federal government, Clan X versus Clan Y, or which clan now controls which region—rather than discerning the gathering storm of impending social and demographic forces.My purpose in this essay is to force Somali scholarship out of the ostrich syndrome and compel it to see the effect of regional social and demographic transformations on the social and geographic boundary of Somaliness. My argument is that, unless Somalis can subdue the current disintegration of Somalia, the ramparts of the nation as we know them will be severely tested—if not unhinged—by the demographic and economic forces of its neighbors. The purpose here is not to sound a false alarm, but to compel Somali scholars to reflect on relevant comparative and contrastive morphologies of migrations and counter-migrations. This increased awareness would help us to reassess and gauge the ramifications of the ongoing immigrations and economic and geopolitical tendencies of Ethiopia and Kenya on the social and geographic boundaries of Somaliness.The vexing nature of the political conflict and the legitimization crisis facing the region is most revealed in Somalia. Over the past twenty years, the Somali crisis has been articulated as an immediate conflict between differently named central governements with various groups claiming one form of camouflaged identity or another. This is not surprising because this conflict will mark its twenty-fourth anniversary next year and has taken on many different names. If history is a guide, this stubborn saga may prove to be nothing more than the newest episode of a political soap opera that cinematically kills certain characters and replaces them with new ones so that what actually changes is the naming of the oppositional binary characters rather than the conflict itself.The Dynamics WithinOn the eve of the Somali Civil War in 1991, the conflict, at least on the surface, was between United Somali Congress (USC) versus Siyaad Barre; within a year, it changed to Ali Mahdi versus Aideed. After twenty years and several character changes, we now have the National Federal Government versus Al-Shabab, Ahlu Sunna WalJamaaca, and other self-proclaimed regional states. However, what remains unresolved is how to move the Somali nation away from divisive clans toward a more unified national identity articulated through one or another shared interest. Both Sheikh Aweys Mohamed and Sayyid Mohamed Abdulle Hassan, for example, attempted to transcend Somali clan divisiveness by introducing their own Islamic movements, which were infused with local, clan-based sensibilities. The most revealing example of the Somali attempts to transcend tribalism came during the Siyaad Barre regime. One of Barre’s first actions was to “bury tribalism” by burning the tribe in the form of an effigy at pre-organized gatherings in every city and town in Somalia. These burnings dictated that from then onward, tribalism was dead, and any discussion of the idea would not be tolerated. As with all dictators during the initial phase of solidifying their power, Barre camouflaged his activities under the banner of scientific socialism. He claimed that Somalia will be economically self-sufficient in a decade and that all Somalis will prosper regardless of their clan identity. However, within a few years, it was clear to the average Somali that Barre was engaging in tribalism by recruiting members of his clan and strategically placing them in important political, economic, and military positions. The Somali inability to transcend tribalism is revealed in Amin Amir’s 2006 cartoon, which shows a criminal being dragged by a member of the Islamic Counts Union (AminAmir.com). The Islamic Courts Union representative says, “Behaviors of the old days are no longer acceptable. I will now take you to the Islamic Courts Union’s jail.” The criminal responds, “Please take me to the court of my clan.” A bystander says, “The criminal is correct. Take him to the court of his clan; they are the same anyway” (http://aminarts.com). I reference this cartoon not to suggest that the Islamic Courts Union was simply a proxy for clan motives, but to highlight the power of clan identities in informing religious, ideological, and nationalist identities in Somalia. More important, clan identities inform who is and who is not considered an enemy. If the roles of Ethiopia and Kenya over the past few years are examined, one will find that each country was considered as an enemy by one clan and a friend by another. This means that, in Somali clan politics, determinations about whether a country is an external enemy or a friend depends on the prevailing clan power politics and the balance of power between the clans. In the case of the controversy surrounding the supporters of the selfdeclared Jubbaland and supporters of the recently created state of Southwestern Somalia, Kenya is either a friend or a foe depending on where one’s allegiances lie. Also, if one examines Somali Islamic movements, one will find that they emcompass diverse outlooks, objectives, and practices as informed by clan, ecological, and subsistence variables, making it difficult to concieve of a movement that can appeal to all Somalis. The reason why Somalis cannot transcend tribalism is that all national and local identities are conflated with clan identities, making it difficult to tell one from the other. The inability to start a movement that is able to transcend parochial, clan, or ethnic ontologies is not isolated to the Somali situation. Similar unappreciated and misundersood complexities are observable in countries throughout the region. This is because the conventional historiography that informed much of the scholarship on the Horn of Africa has been derived from the thesis that the main source of the region’s political, social, and economic crises resulted from the colonial demarcation of state boundaries, creating anthropologically blurred social and physical boundaries that are buttressed by neo-colonialism. This kind of scholarship is, of course, not unique to the Horn of Africa, but is a general part of African scholarship. Postcolonial Geopolitical DynamicsOver the past fifty years, this scholarship has articulated various African problems as well as identities in terms of resistance to colonialism and structural adjustment problems among other areas. The usage of resistance to colonialism, structural adjustment issues, and postcolonial dictators as the only categories for analyzing the region’s social and political realities has created two conceptual problems. First, the focus on resistance has created a condition in which external interventions and international geopolitical interests have been indiscriminately used as the main turning points that supposedly arrested the cultural and historical moments of the region’s past. Second, resistance to colonial occupation and postcolonial geopolitical dynamics has created a situation in which each country’s population has been portrayed as a homogeneous entity, and the only acknowledged differences and distinctions were because of the colonized and colonizer binary (Cooper, 1994). The point here is not to deny or question the negative effect of European economic and social structures on colonized societies, but to acknowledge that such an ontological position does not speak to contemporary social and political realities in the Horn of Africa. In other words, the region’s social and political contexts are fundamentally different from what they were two decades ago. This kind of historiography cannot account for the fact that the technological, demographic, and social contexts within which the regional social conflicts take place have become complicated. Recent advances in transportation and communication systems have compressed both time and space, creating a condition in which the flow of ideas, social action, and people has been transnationalized so that the traditional hegemony of the nation-state cannot be sustained empirically (Kearney 1995; Basch et al. 1992). Demographically, the unending conflict in the region has led to an emigration of hundreds of thousands from the region, setting the foundation for a large, influential diaspora in Europe and North America. In addition, the conflict increased the level of migration within and between countries such that each country has a significant number of immigrants from other countries in the region. Underlying these local social difficulties, however, is demographic transformation, which is another transformative variable that has not been accounted for. I will spend the remainder of the paper elaborating on this issue.The Dynamics of Social Transformation and Shifts in IdentityThe idea of social transformation is intended to capture both the demographic and identity shifts that have occurred in the region over the past three decades and explain how these modifications may alter the political and power dynamics of the region. Over the past thirty years, the Horn of Africa has experienced one of its most significant demographic and population transformations in history. Prior to the 1990s, there was minimal migration between countries in the region. Since the Somali Civil War, hundreds of thousands of Somalis have fled to Ethiopia and settled in Addis Ababa and other regions of the country. A significant number of Ethiopians have immigrated to Somalia, particularly to the north and northeast, and Djibouti. When I visited Djibouti few years ago, I realized there was an increasing influx of Ethiopian immigrants in the country. My short visit to Addis Ababa also confirmed the existence of a significant Somali immigrant population in the city. This is on top of the Somali Ethiopian population in what is officially known as Zone Five, or Kilika Shanaad, which houses about 10 percent of the total Ethiopian population. The number is significantly larger if the Somali immigrant population in Ethiopia is included. Both Djibouti and northern Somalia will likely experience a larger influx of Ethiopian immigrants. If this trend continues, Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Somalia will have significant ethnic populations from each side of their national border. Similar trends will appear in Eritrea, Kenya, and Sudan as well. The region will be divided into immigrant sending or destination centers. This pattern may change the complex ethnic dynamics of each country so that the meaning of nationalism will be replaced with one based on economic opportunities. This demographic transformation is further facilitated by increasing economic interdependency within the region. One clear example of this is the economic relationship between Ethiopia and Djibouti. In 2002, Ethiopia and Djibouti signed an electric power sharing agreement. This project costs more than US$80 million, including US$33 million from the African Development Bank and US$56 million from AfDB Bank Group. The agreement will likely increase the region’s economic viability. More important, this project will further interdependence within the region, which will, along with population movement, change its social and political dynamics. The project will result in the economies of Ethiopia and Djibouti being so closely linked that any regional conflict will paralyze both countries and, by extension, Somalia. One of the most revealing examples of this demographic transformation is found in the United States. Over the past two centuries, the United States has been transformed from a primarily white society with small black and native populations to one with large non-white populations. Current population projections indicate that by 2050, the non-white population will be nearly half of the total population. We already see the social and political consequences of this transformation in the election of President Obama, an idea that political pundits would not have entertained just a decade ago. If the effect of demography is as important in the Horn of Africa as it is in the United States, the region will experience similar outcomes in the next fifty years or so. This shift will be even more significant given the increasing economiinterdependency between the countries of the region, particularly Somalia, Ethiopia, and Kenya. Given the current relationship between Ethiopia and Eritrea, the Ethiopian economy will become increasingly dependent on Somalia and Djibouti because both countries are natural markets for Ethiopia. Because Ethiopia has the second largest population on the continent, Somalia and Djibouti will remain destinations for Ethiopian immigrants, which will, most likely, reconfigure the demographics of both countries.The most significant demographic transformations will likely occur in Somalia and Djibouti. Since the Somali-speaking population is the smallest in the region, it will experience the most noticeable social and demographic shifts. Despite its size, the Somali-speaking population represents the most dispersed and most mobile community in the region. The size, mobility, and presence of the Somali population in Ethiopia and Kenya have internal and external implications for Somalia. If the quality of life in Djibouti and Somalia is better than in Ethiopia, which is very likely, Djibouti and Somalia will experience a significant influx of Ethiopians, which will, as I pointed out earlier, transform the ethnic boundaries of Somaliness. On the one hand, due to their large numbers in Kenya and Ethiopia, Somalis will influence the political dynamics of both countries. In other words, the Somali-speaking population will play a role in transforming the region’s political and identity dynamics.Conclusion The Horn of Africa is probably in the midst of its second great migration, one that will parallel or eclipse the sixteenth-century migration that cemented the region’s current settlement and identity patterns. Despite the lack of written record, this sixteenth century migration was spearheaded by the so-called great Somali migration waves that pushed the Oromo communities further upward into the Ethiopian highlands. This migration, which was allegedly stopped by the British colonial administration in the early decades of the twentieth century, is credited with the current identity settlement patterns of the region. The migration of Somali people may have been caused by long droughts and clan warfare. I suspect similar conditions are at play in the region today, except that this time, the migration push may not just come from Somalia, but all sides. The most important component of this modern migration may be the emigration from Ethiopia to Somalia. A new factor in the current migration is the possibility of increased interdependency between Ethiopia, Somalia, and Kenya, which will simultaneously make economic opportunities, not ethnic identities, into the primary motive of settlement patterns and increase the interdependency of the countries’ political and economic structures.These processes will probably have the greatest effect on Somalia and Djibouti. Because Somalia and Djibouti have two of the smallest populations in the region, significant Ethiopian emigration will certainly increase the ethnic composition and diversity of both Somalia and Djibouti. My purpose is not to suggest that migration and demographic transformations are inherently a problem. To the contrary, it is, in fact, an engine for social change and economic development for the entire region. But my ultimate purpose is to gently force Somali scholarship out of the ostrich syndrome and to embrace the methodological imagination that will allow it to understand the Somali condition from a context increasingly characterized by continuous and dynamic social and demographic transformations.A federal monitor overseeing changes to the police department's stop-and-frisk program said in a progress report Tuesday the department has done good work setting new policy but putting it into practice will be a challenge.A federal judge ruled in 2013 that the practice of stopping people and frisking them violated the civil rights of minorities, many of whom sued. Monitor Peter Zimroth said in a report to the judge that the New York Police Department (NYPD) has distributed a new patrol guide that prohibits biased-based policing and put into use new training for recruits and current officers. A new stop-report form is being tested."The progress the report details owes much to the hard work of NYPD officials and valuable input from the plaintiffs," Zimroth wrote. "All the parties worked diligently, collaboratively, and in good faith."But the challenge will be to ensure the written changes are carried out. Zimroth said he's discovered in focus groups that many officers and higher-ups don't understand what's expected of them and are unaware of the changes. The message "needs to be communicated and reinforced better, not just at the top, but throughout the department," he wrote.Street stops were down to about 24,000 last year, from a high of 685,724 in 2011. Most of the people stopped are black and Hispanic men, and fewer than 10 percent are arrested. But the judge did not outlaw the practice, and Zimroth said that part of the reform must be to make sure the practice is done correctly."Getting it right means this: that police officers understand their lawful authority and limit their activities to what is permitted by law," he wrote.And it means officers don't avoid enforcement activity when appropriate. He reported many officers feel concerned they will be sued or disciplined for making a stop. He said officers must also treat the community members professionally, "with dignity and respect."He said the task is large and will take time to accomplish.At a federal trial, nearly a dozen black and Hispanic men told firsthand accounts of frightening encounters with police officers who stopped and sometimes frisked them but didn't arrest them. They said they were targeted because they were minorities.The NYPD, the nation's biggest police department, said Zimroth's report will help with its ongoing training program."The NYPD's overall stop, question and frisk review continues to be a 'work-in-progress' in collaboration with the Monitor and other interested parties," it said in a statement. "The Department's training in connection with this issue is well underway both at the police academy recruit level as well as through our on-going in-service training in the various field commands."Democratic Mayor Bill de Blasio's administration dropped the city's appeal of the case when he took office, and he andpolicCommissioner William Bratton have said the policy was overused and created mistrust between police and the community.President Barack Obama said Tuesday he would nominate a candidate to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court who is "indisputably" qualified. He called on the staunch Republican opposition in the Senate to rise above "venom and rancor" and vote on confirming the nominee."I intend to do my job between now and Jan. 20 of 2017," he said. "I expect them to do their job as well."Obama told reporters at a news conference in his first extended comments on the fight over filling the seat left empty by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.Obama cast the dispute as a question of how far Republicans want to push their opposition and whether the Senate can function in the hyperpoliticized climate. Fights over judicial nominations are not new, he noted, but "the Supreme Court's different.""This will be a test, one more test of whether or not norms, rules, basic fair play can function at all in Washington these days," he said.Obama spoke as he closed a meeting of Southeast Asian leaders at Sunnylands, a Southern California desert retreat. Obama gathered ASEAN members for two days of talks on security and counterterrorism efforts.But the president's attention was divided. Since Scalia's unexpected death at a remote Texas ranch on Saturday, White House lawyers and advisers have been scrambling to refine and vet a list of potential replacements, while also devising a strategy to push a candidate through the Republican-led Senate.Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has said he doesn't think Obama should be putting a candidate forward. McConnell and several Republican senators up for re-election this year,say Obama should leave the choice up to the next president. The November election, they argue, will give voters a chance to weigh in on the direction of the court.Obama dismissed that notion. He has said he will put forward a replacement in due time and that he believes the Senate will have "plenty of time" to give the nominee a fair hearing and a vote. Democrats say Obama has every right and a constitutional duty to fill vacancies on the court until he leaves office Jan. 20, 2017. The Republicans' recommended solution is "irresponsible, and it's unprecedented," Sen. Pat Leahy, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Tuesday. "The American public expects us to do the job we're elected to do. The president is going to do what he is elected to do and let's vote up or down."The dispute reflects years of escalating partisan hostilities over judicial nominations, as well as the unusual timing.The pace of lower court confirmations always slows in a presidential election year, as the party that does not control the White House prefers to hold out hope that its nominee will fill vacant judgeships rather than give lifetime tenure to the other party's choices.But Supreme Court vacancies in presidential years are rare, in part because the justices avoid retiring when prospects for confirming successors are uncertain.If Senate Republicans hold fast to their vow not to confirm anyone Obama nominates, then the Supreme Court will operate with eight justices not just for the rest of this court term, but for most of the next one as well. High court terms begin in October, and the 80 or so cases argued in the course of a term typically are decided by early summer.The court will be unable to issue nationwide rulings on any issue in which the justices split 4-4. The bombing of two schools and five hospitals in Syria allegedly by Russian warplanes has been slammed as a “war crime,” as the ongoing bloodshed diminished hopes for a cease-fire in the conflict.Up to 50 civilians, including children, died when missiles hit at least five medical buildings and two schools in the Aleppo and Idlib provinces on Monday.U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said the raids violated international law and “cast a shadow” over efforts to end Syria's five-year civil war. He did not say who was responsible for the attacks but groups monitoring the conflict suspected the strikes were carried out by Russia, an ally of the Syrian regime.Russia’s Health Minister Veronika Skvortsova denied Moscow was responsible, saying its military had targeted Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) infrastructure and that she had no reason to believe it had bombed civilians.“We are confident that [there is] no way it could be done by our defense forces. This contradicts our ideology,” she said.French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault said attacks on health facilities in Syria by the regime or its supporters were “unacceptable and must stop immediately.”Turkey on Monday separately accused Russia of “an obvious war crime” and warned that there would be consequences if Russia did not immediately end such attacks.Syria's ambassador to Moscow, Riad Haddad, said the hospital was targeted by a U.S. raid. “American warplanes destroyed it. Russian warplanes had nothing to do with any of it. The information that has been gathered will completely back that up,” he told Russian state television channel Rossiya 24.The U.S., which, like the U.N., did not specify who carried out the strikes, said two civilian hospitals were hit in northern Syria: one run by medical charity Doctors Without Borders and another in rebel-held Azaz.“That the Assad regime and its supporters would continue these attacks … casts doubt on Russia's willingness and/or ability to help bring to a stop the continued brutality of the Assad regime against its own people,” the U.S. State Department said. Syrian President Bashar Assad warned Turkey and Saudi Arabia that any ground invasion of Syria would have “global repercussions” and said sending in troops would not be a “picnic.”Commenting on an agreement brokered last week by the U.S., Russia and other world powers for a temporary cessation of hostilities, he said, “Cease-fires occur between armies and states but never between a state and terrorists.”“They say that they want a cease-fire within a week. All right, who will talk to a terrorist organization if it refuses to cease-fire? Who will punish it?”Assad's comments were his first since the agreement on Friday to bring about a pause in fighting within a week.Earlier this month, Saudi Arabia and the UAE said they were prepared to send ground troops to Syria to fight ISIL if a U.S.-led coalition targeting the group with airstrikes agreed to the offer.Russia warned that if foreign troops entered the country, it could lead to a world war. when they repatriate their foreign earnings.Ndaruzaniye, 2011)
Maxaa ka soo baxay shirkii Addis Ababa? (Warbixin)
by mahad | Sunday, Dec 25, 2016 | 13901 views
December 25(Jowhar)-Wararka ka imanaya dalka Itoobiya ayaa sheegaya in kulan labo maalmood socday oo ka dhacay magaalada Addis Ababa una dhexeeyay madaxweynayaasha Maamul goboleedyada Koofurgalbeed, Galmudug iyo Hirshabeelle iyo mas’uuliyiin ka socotay wadamada Imaaraadka Carabta,Itoobiya iyo dalal kale uu ku aqbalay Madaxweynaha Koofurgalbeed Soomaaliya Shariif Xasan Shiikh Aadan inuu ka tanaasulo musharaxnimada doorashada Madaxweynaha Soomaaliya
Kulankan ka dhacay magaalada Addis Ababa ayaa wararka ay heleyso shabakada jowhar.com waxa ay sheegayaan in uu sidoo kale aqbalay Madaxweynaha Koofurgalbeed Soomaaliya Shariif Xasan Sheekh Aadan uu aqbalay in uu joojiyo ku taageerada mid kamid ah xildhibaanada baarlamaanka Soomaaliya Cabdirashiid Xiddig in uu noqdo guddoomiyaha baarlamaanka Soomaaliya.
Wararka ayaa waxa ay intaa ku darayaan in Madaxweyne Xasan Sheekh uu ballan qaaday Madaxweynaha Koofurgalbeed Soomaaliya Shariif Xasan laga tala geliyo xubnaha Koofur Galbeed ay ku yeelaneyso dowladda Federaalka oo uu ugu horeeyo Guddoomiyaha Baarlamaanka Federaalka ah.
Dowlada Itoobiya iyo dowladaha deriska la ah Soomaaliya ayaa isku xiray ammaanka Mandiqadda Geeska Afrika iyo in siyaasadda Soomaaliya laga ilaaliyo isbedel xilligan.
Madaxweynaha dowlad goboleedka Koofur Galbeed Soomaaliya Shariif Xasan Sheekh Aadan ayaa kulankan kadib u duulay dhulka barakeysan ee Makka si uu usoo guto Cimro, kadib bilo badan oo siyaasad adag uu ku jiray, halka labada madaxweyne ee Cabdikariin Xuseen Guuleed iyo Cali Cabdullaahi Cosoble ay u ambabaxeen Nairobi.
Koofur Galbeed Soomaaliya waxaa laga soo doortay 69 xildhibaan ee Aqalka Hoose iyo 8 Aqalka Sare ah (walow hadda lagu daray 3 xubnood oo dheeri ah) kuwan oo ah xubnaha ugu badan oo lagu soo doorto hal dowlad goboleed, taas ayaana muhiim ka dhigtay codadka xildhibaannada Koofur Galbeed iyo maamulka deegaankaas oo raadinayay isbedel dhanka awoodda siyaasadda ah oo suura gelin kara in mar uun masuul ka soo jeeda beelahaasi uu ku guuleysto xilalka Madaxweynaha iyo Ra’iisulwasaaraha.
Like it? Share it!
7
« Previous Story
Dagaal qasaare geystey oo ka dhacay deegaanka Xawaadley ee gobolka Sh/dhexe
Next Story »
Cumar C/rashiid oo la kulmay Xildhibaanada labada Aqal ee Jubbaland
More Related News
Guddoomiyaha Gobolka Banaadir oo baajiyay banaan bax saaka ka dhici lahaa MuqdishoDecember 26 (Jowhar)— Banaan bax looga soo horjeeday xubnaha lagu daray Aqalka Sare ee laga qadiyay Gobolka Banaadir oo saaka lagu waday inuu ka dhaco magaalada Muqdisho...
Madaxweynaha Puntland oo beelo u qoondeeyay saddexdii kursi ee lagu kordhiyay Aqalka SareDecember 26 (Jowhar)— Madaxweynaha Puntland C/wali Maxamed Cali Gaas oo ka qeyb galay shirkii Madasha Wada-tashiga Qaran ee habeen hore laga soo saaray war murtiyeed...
Musharax Dr. Siciid C/llaahi oo la kulmay Bulshada ku nool Magaalada Muqdisho (Sawirro)December 26 (Jowhar)— Musharax Dr.Siciid Cabdullaahi Deni oo ah Musharax u taagan Xilka Madaxweynaha Dowladda Federaalka Somaliya ayaa Casuumaad gaar ah u fidiyey qeybo...
Ciidamadda Kenya oo looga digay inay faragelin ku sameeyaan siyaasadda SoomaaliyaDecember 26 (Jowhar)—Taliyaha guud ciidamada Kenya ayaa digniin siiyay ciidamada dowladda Kenya ee ku sugan magaalada Kismaayo ee gobolka Jubbada Hoose iyo deegaanada...
Cumar C/rashiid oo la kulmay Xildhibaanada labada Aqal ee JubbalandDecember 26 (Jowhar)— Musharaxiinta u taagan xilka Madaxweynaha ayaa bilaabay xod-xodashada iyo kasbashada Xildhibaanada laga soo doortay gobolada, iyadoo Musharax walba...
Water Security” is herein described as the nexus between the availability,Walmart has leapfrogged Royal Dutch Shell as the world's largest company, topping the Fortune magazine Global 500 ranking accessibility and use of water. The concept is defined as the ‘availability of, and access to water in sufficient quantity and quality to meet livelihood needs of all households throughout the year, without considering the needs of other users. Water Security is further described herein under ‘Securing Water for Air France-KLM revised its yearly earnings forecast down from 2.5bn euros to between 2.2 and 2.3bnLast week, Laura Wade-Gery, who was head of M&S's online business, was promoted to oversee M&S's UK stores and some are tipping her to, one day, take over from Mr Bolland. euros.Production’. (Valerie Ndaruzaniye, 2011). While ‘Water Insecurity’ refers to the exact opposite of the mentioned concept that is been the unavailability and inaccessibility of enough water to meet the livelihood need of all households in a period of one yearIn the Horn of Africa, increasing scarcity and degradation of water sources seriously threatens human well-being. The population in the region (Ethiopia, Eritrea, Sudan, Djibouti, Somalia, Kenya and Uganda) has increased fourfold in the past 50 years and continues to grow rapidly (United Nations Population Division, 2010). Farmers need more water to feed more mouths and extended areas are needed for food production, at the expense of forest and pasture lands. With a high and stable number of pastoral communities and decreasing amount of pastureland, pressure on land and water grows. The mounting need for fertile soils and irrigated land is intensified by high international demands for food and energy. Investors from all over the world are ready to invest in commercial farming in Sudan, Kenya, Uganda and Ethiopia. With inadequate soil and water management measures being taken, this growing pressure on natural resources leads to a decrease in the quality and quantity of soils, forests and water resources. (Eric van de Giessen: 2011)To put this region into water security context, according to Earth Trends, Environmental Information/World Resources Institute, Djibouti’s per capita is 460M3; Eritrea’s per capita is 701M3; Ethiopia’s per capita is 1,666M3 and Somalia’s per capita is 628 M3 (IRWR, 2011). According to the Falkenmark Water Stress Indicator, a country or a region is said to experience “water stress” when annual water supplies drop below 1,700 cubic meters per person per year. This means almost all parts of the Horn of Africa region can generally be termed as water stress region or facing water insecurityFigure 1, Map of the Horn of Africa region (Yellow): Source: Google Map 2010It is in this context; this paper will be exploring the water scarcity and stress in the horn of Africa region and how this will increase the vulnerability of the households and farmers as well as the impact it will have on the ability of the locals to utilize their socio-economic potentials. The paper will further attempt to assess the capacity of the existing institutions to manage the task at hand and finally the author referring to his personal knowledge and experience in the area as well as the reflections of the articles reviewed will hopefully suggest possible strategies for all the concerned stakeholders.In this review article, the author will attempt to examine five peer-reviewed articles, some with specific regional details and others more general outlook on water security, and will then try to create a holistic picture on the water situation on the ground as well as the efforts of those in charge in trying to mitigate the challenges of water security and enhance greater socio-economic well being for their people. Here are the articles the author intends to review for this paper: 1:Valerie Ndaruzaniye (2011) Water security in Ethiopia, Risk and vulnerability assessment. 2: Eric van de Giessen (2011) Horn of Africa Environmental Security Assessment-Institute for Environmental Security. 3: Simbarashe Govere et.al (2010) Coping with Water Scarcity in Eastern Africa; the role of intra-regional virtual water trade. 4) Declan Conway, et.al (2008) Rainfall and Water Resources Variability in Sub-Saharan Africa during the Twentieth Century 5) Noah Amin (2007) Water Scarcity In The Horn Of Africa And Its Deadly Consequences.In this part, the discussion will be mainly centered on the major factors that are causing water stress and scarcity in Africa generally and in particular the Horn. Almost all the articles reviewed for this paper mainly agree the major cause of the water stress in the region, but as we will later discover it, there are few country specific challenges with greater regional water security significance to it.In Sub-Saharan Africa, the Eastern African region, particularly the Horn of Africa, is considered highly geographically exposed to climate change and its impact over water. Out of 200 million people living in the Horn of Africa, 70 million are located in areas prone to extreme droughts leading to water insecurity and food shortages. In this Eastern African region, floods and droughts can occur in the same area within a very short period. Such events can exacerbate inadequate water availability in quality and quantity, sufficient enough to sustain agricultural activities and energy production. As a result, this often leads to famine and widespread disruption of socio-The United States, seeing new hope for Somalia, will appoint a new ambassador to Mogadishu for the first time since closing its embassy there 23 years ago as the East African country descended into chaos, a senior U.S. government official said on Tuesday.Wendy Sherman, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, didn’t specify exactly when the ambassador would be named, but said it would be “soon.”There were hopeful signs of improvement in the security and economic conditions in the country, following years when Somalia had become “a synonym for chaos,” she said at the United States Institute of Peace think tank in Washington.“As a reflection both of our deepening relationship with the country and of our faith that better times are ahead, the president will propose the first U.S. ambassador to Somalia in more than two decades,” Sherman said.economic well beingA U.S. diplomat based in Nairobi, the capital of neighboring Kenya, who traveled sporadically to Mogadishu, has represented U.S. interests in Somalia. A State Department official said the new ambassador would not yet be based permanently in Mogadishu. Mentioning recent attacks in Somalia and neighboring Kenya by the al-Qaeda-affiliated militant group al Shabaab, Sherman said there was still a tough struggle to secure the country and rebuild its government, economy and infrastructure.“The path ahead remains rocky and uphill,” she said, adding that now was the best time in a quarter of a century to start realizing the post-independence hopes of the former Italian colony for peace and prosperity.Discussing the U.S. commitment to Somalia’s security, she said “a small contingent of U.S. military personnel, including some special operations forces, have been present in parts of Somalia for several years.”Their aim had been to work with Somali and African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) forces, providing information and advice on fighting al ShabaabSherman noted there had been a number of direct U.S. military strikes on militant targets, but didn’t specify whether they were drone strikesFrom time-to-time the U.S. military has conducted such action in Somalia against a limited number of targets who … have been determined to be part of al Qaedashe said.These may continue in the future if it was established that there was a “continuing imminent threat to U.S. persons.”. (Valerie Samsung is the world's biggest maker of mobile phones and the handset division accounts for the bulk of its profits.The South Korean firm said it "witnessed a slowdown in the overall smartphone market growth and saw increased competition in the Chinese and some European markets" during the period.Meanwhile, a stronger Korean currency also hurt Samsung's earnings during the period.The Korean won rose more than 11% against the US dollar and nearly 7% against the euro between July 2013 and end of June this year.A strengthening currency hurts profits of firms such as Samsung - which rely heavily on exports -More than half a century ago, Frantz Fanon made two pivotal observations about cataclysmic convulsions that would engulf Central and Eastern Africa. The first referred to his prescient observation that the African continent resembles a revolver, and Zaire is the trigger (Fanon, 1966 [2005]). His clairvoyant statement eerily prefigures what political commentators have, since the 1990s, characterized as the potential starting point of Africa’s First World War (Williams, 2013). After the overthrow of Mobutu Sese Seko, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly known as Zaire) became the site where warring armies from more than four neighboring countries came to battle one another, presumably to defend the legitimate existence of a proxy group in the country. Zimbabwean and Angolan forces were aligned with the regime of Laurent Kabila, while Rwanda and Uganda—the original patrons of Laurent Kabila and his putsch-were now his sworn enemies. Fanon’s second observation warned against the ramifications and implications of a Somali-Ethiopian war whose foundation was nationalistic (Fanon, 1969). This warning came with devastating consequences. The resulting political, social, and economic landscape of Somalia compels us to examine the contours of both the centripetal and centrifugal forces that still animate social upheavals. This requires a bold reexamination of analytic categories, and the ability to envision new ones to cope with the new reality. In this essay, I confine myself to the new reality in the Horn of Africa. I will engage in a comparative analysis by telescoping a panoramic view of regional history. This new telescoping and reality must be understood, not from the vantage point of national disintegration by way of political conflict, but through the perspective that social transformation and migration work as the ultimate engine of social change (Richerson and Boyd,Horn of Africa in FocusOn New Year’s Eve 1991, the entire Somali state collapsed, and the people of Somalia began the last decade of the twentieth century mourning, instead of celebrating, the onset of a new millennium. To be sure, this kind of political conflict is not confined to Somalia; it remains a significant feature of the region. The Horn of Africa, which encompasses Djibouti, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Kenya, South Sudan, Somalia, Sudan, and Uganda, is one of, if not the most conflict-prone zones in the world. Several interlocking conflict clusters exist in the region. The first involves the long-standing civil strife in South Sudan, which extends into Uganda and Chad. The second centers around the complicated network of conflicts that link Djibouti, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Somalia, and Kenya (Prendergast and Thomas-Jensen, 2007). Each country is characterized by complicated and interlocked internal social and economic conflicts. Over the past three decades, every country in the region except Kenya has experienced a contextaltering social conflict. Since the overthrow of Emperor Haile Selassie by the Derge in the early 1970s, Ethiopia has undergone radical social transformations. Once considered a cohesive Christian nation surrounded by an ocean of hostile Muslim populations, Ethiopia’s manufactured and official narrative, by the 1970s, rapidly morphed into an internally conflicted nation with multiple identities, voices, and contested narratives. Eritrea’s independence honeymoon is on the brink of becoming a nightmare with various ethnic and religious demarcation lines and conflicts. After a protracted civil war, South Sudan seceded from Sudan to become the newest member of the African Union. Within a year of declaring its independence, however, South Sudan descended into political chaos. Somalia, the supposedly most homogeneous country on the continent, has shown that homogeneity, even if it were empirically true, is not an indication of political stability. Even Kenya, the region’s most economically and politically stable country, is facing a legitimization crisis (Habermas, 1973), as are many other countries in the region.What is more problematic is the apparent inability of much of the scholarship in the region, particularly Somali scholarship, to comprehend and contextualize the ever-expanding violence and the resultant dissolution of the nation-state. This is partly because the outlook of both Somali scholarship and Somali society has generally remained provincial, unable to theoretically and methodologically locate the Somali condition within the larger social, political, and demographic contexts of the region and the world. Somali scholarship suffers from what I consider to be an “ostrich syndrome.” By ostrich syndrome, I mean a symptom that some people exhibit or manifest when they are confronted by confounding and conflicting social, political, or controversial issues in their lives. Instead of confronting the issues, such people would rather ignore them or, as ostriches do, bury their head in the sand, hoping that the threat will go away. This is why current Somali scholarship is obsessed with everyday dynamics–Al-Shabab versus the federal government, Clan X versus Clan Y, or which clan now controls which region—rather than discerning the gathering storm of impending social and demographic forces.My purpose in this essay is to force Somali scholarship out of the ostrich syndrome and compel it to see the effect of regional social and demographic transformations on the social and geographic boundary of Somaliness. My argument is that, unless Somalis can subdue the current disintegration of Somalia, the ramparts of the nation as we know them will be severely tested—if not unhinged—by the demographic and economic forces of its neighbors. The purpose here is not to sound a false alarm, but to compel Somali scholars to reflect on relevant comparative and contrastive morphologies of migrations and counter-migrations. This increased awareness would help us to reassess and gauge the ramifications of the ongoing immigrations and economic and geopolitical tendencies of Ethiopia and Kenya on the social and geographic boundaries of Somaliness.The vexing nature of the political conflict and the legitimization crisis facing the region is most revealed in Somalia. Over the past twenty years, the Somali crisis has been articulated as an immediate conflict between differently named central governements with various groups claiming one form of camouflaged identity or another. This is not surprising because this conflict will mark its twenty-fourth anniversary next year and has taken on many different names. If history is a guide, this stubborn saga may prove to be nothing more than the newest episode of a political soap opera that cinematically kills certain characters and replaces them with new ones so that what actually changes is the naming of the oppositional binary characters rather than the conflict itself.The Dynamics WithinOn the eve of the Somali Civil War in 1991, the conflict, at least on the surface, was between United Somali Congress (USC) versus Siyaad Barre; within a year, it changed to Ali Mahdi versus Aideed. After twenty years and several character changes, we now have the National Federal Government versus Al-Shabab, Ahlu Sunna WalJamaaca, and other self-proclaimed regional states. However, what remains unresolved is how to move the Somali nation away from divisive clans toward a more unified national identity articulated through one or another shared interest. Both Sheikh Aweys Mohamed and Sayyid Mohamed Abdulle Hassan, for example, attempted to transcend Somali clan divisiveness by introducing their own Islamic movements, which were infused with local, clan-based sensibilities. The most revealing example of the Somali attempts to transcend tribalism came during the Siyaad Barre regime. One of Barre’s first actions was to “bury tribalism” by burning the tribe in the form of an effigy at pre-organized gatherings in every city and town in Somalia. These burnings dictated that from then onward, tribalism was dead, and any discussion of the idea would not be tolerated. As with all dictators during the initial phase of solidifying their power, Barre camouflaged his activities under the banner of scientific socialism. He claimed that Somalia will be economically self-sufficient in a decade and that all Somalis will prosper regardless of their clan identity. However, within a few years, it was clear to the average Somali that Barre was engaging in tribalism by recruiting members of his clan and strategically placing them in important political, economic, and military positions. The Somali inability to transcend tribalism is revealed in Amin Amir’s 2006 cartoon, which shows a criminal being dragged by a member of the Islamic Counts Union (AminAmir.com). The Islamic Courts Union representative says, “Behaviors of the old days are no longer acceptable. I will now take you to the Islamic Courts Union’s jail.” The criminal responds, “Please take me to the court of my clan.” A bystander says, “The criminal is correct. Take him to the court of his clan; they are the same anyway” (http://aminarts.com). I reference this cartoon not to suggest that the Islamic Courts Union was simply a proxy for clan motives, but to highlight the power of clan identities in informing religious, ideological, and nationalist identities in Somalia. More important, clan identities inform who is and who is not considered an enemy. If the roles of Ethiopia and Kenya over the past few years are examined, one will find that each country was considered as an enemy by one clan and a friend by another. This means that, in Somali clan politics, determinations about whether a country is an external enemy or a friend depends on the prevailing clan power politics and the balance of power between the clans. In the case of the controversy surrounding the supporters of the selfdeclared Jubbaland and supporters of the recently created state of Southwestern Somalia, Kenya is either a friend or a foe depending on where one’s allegiances lie. Also, if one examines Somali Islamic movements, one will find that they emcompass diverse outlooks, objectives, and practices as informed by clan, ecological, and subsistence variables, making it difficult to concieve of a movement that can appeal to all Somalis. The reason why Somalis cannot transcend tribalism is that all national and local identities are conflated with clan identities, making it difficult to tell one from the other. The inability to start a movement that is able to transcend parochial, clan, or ethnic ontologies is not isolated to the Somali situation. Similar unappreciated and misundersood complexities are observable in countries throughout the region. This is because the conventional historiography that informed much of the scholarship on the Horn of Africa has been derived from the thesis that the main source of the region’s political, social, and economic crises resulted from the colonial demarcation of state boundaries, creating anthropologically blurred social and physical boundaries that are buttressed by neo-colonialism. This kind of scholarship is, of course, not unique to the Horn of Africa, but is a general part of African scholarship. Postcolonial Geopolitical DynamicsOver the past fifty years, this scholarship has articulated various African problems as well as identities in terms of resistance to colonialism and structural adjustment problems among other areas. The usage of resistance to colonialism, structural adjustment issues, and postcolonial dictators as the only categories for analyzing the region’s social and political realities has created two conceptual problems. First, the focus on resistance has created a condition in which external interventions and international geopolitical interests have been indiscriminately used as the main turning points that supposedly arrested the cultural and historical moments of the region’s past. Second, resistance to colonial occupation and postcolonial geopolitical dynamics has created a situation in which each country’s population has been portrayed as a homogeneous entity, and the only acknowledged differences and distinctions were because of the colonized and colonizer binary (Cooper, 1994). The point here is not to deny or question the negative effect of European economic and social structures on colonized societies, but to acknowledge that such an ontological position does not speak to contemporary social and political realities in the Horn of Africa. In other words, the region’s social and political contexts are fundamentally different from what they were two decades ago. This kind of historiography cannot account for the fact that the technological, demographic, and social contexts within which the regional social conflicts take place have become complicated. Recent advances in transportation and communication systems have compressed both time and space, creating a condition in which the flow of ideas, social action, and people has been transnationalized so that the traditional hegemony of the nation-state cannot be sustained empirically (Kearney 1995; Basch et al. 1992). Demographically, the unending conflict in the region has led to an emigration of hundreds of thousands from the region, setting the foundation for a large, influential diaspora in Europe and North America. In addition, the conflict increased the level of migration within and between countries such that each country has a significant number of immigrants from other countries in the region. Underlying these local social difficulties, however, is demographic transformation, which is another transformative variable that has not been accounted for. I will spend the remainder of the paper elaborating on this issue.The Dynamics of Social Transformation and Shifts in IdentityThe idea of social transformation is intended to capture both the demographic and identity shifts that have occurred in the region over the past three decades and explain how these modifications may alter the political and power dynamics of the region. Over the past thirty years, the Horn of Africa has experienced one of its most significant demographic and population transformations in history. Prior to the 1990s, there was minimal migration between countries in the region. Since the Somali Civil War, hundreds of thousands of Somalis have fled to Ethiopia and settled in Addis Ababa and other regions of the country. A significant number of Ethiopians have immigrated to Somalia, particularly to the north and northeast, and Djibouti. When I visited Djibouti few years ago, I realized there was an increasing influx of Ethiopian immigrants in the country. My short visit to Addis Ababa also confirmed the existence of a significant Somali immigrant population in the city. This is on top of the Somali Ethiopian population in what is officially known as Zone Five, or Kilika Shanaad, which houses about 10 percent of the total Ethiopian population. The number is significantly larger if the Somali immigrant population in Ethiopia is included. Both Djibouti and northern Somalia will likely experience a larger influx of Ethiopian immigrants. If this trend continues, Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Somalia will have significant ethnic populations from each side of their national border. Similar trends will appear in Eritrea, Kenya, and Sudan as well. The region will be divided into immigrant sending or destination centers. This pattern may change the complex ethnic dynamics of each country so that the meaning of nationalism will be replaced with one based on economic opportunities. This demographic transformation is further facilitated by increasing economic interdependency within the region. One clear example of this is the economic relationship between Ethiopia and Djibouti. In 2002, Ethiopia and Djibouti signed an electric power sharing agreement. This project costs more than US$80 million, including US$33 million from the African Development Bank and US$56 million from AfDB Bank Group. The agreement will likely increase the region’s economic viability. More important, this project will further interdependence within the region, which will, along with population movement, change its social and political dynamics. The project will result in the economies of Ethiopia and Djibouti being so closely linked that any regional conflict will paralyze both countries and, by extension, Somalia. One of the most revealing examples of this demographic transformation is found in the United States. Over the past two centuries, the United States has been transformed from a primarily white society with small black and native populations to one with large non-white populations. Current population projections indicate that by 2050, the non-white population will be nearly half of the total population. We already see the social and political consequences of this transformation in the election of President Obama, an idea that political pundits would not have entertained just a decade ago. If the effect of demography is as important in the Horn of Africa as it is in the United States, the region will experience similar outcomes in the next fifty years or so. This shift will be even more significant given the increasing economiinterdependency between the countries of the region, particularly Somalia, Ethiopia, and Kenya. Given the current relationship between Ethiopia and Eritrea, the Ethiopian economy will become increasingly dependent on Somalia and Djibouti because both countries are natural markets for Ethiopia. Because Ethiopia has the second largest population on the continent, Somalia and Djibouti will remain destinations for Ethiopian immigrants, which will, most likely, reconfigure the demographics of both countries.The most significant demographic transformations will likely occur in Somalia and Djibouti. Since the Somali-speaking population is the smallest in the region, it will experience the most noticeable social and demographic shifts. Despite its size, the Somali-speaking population represents the most dispersed and most mobile community in the region. The size, mobility, and presence of the Somali population in Ethiopia and Kenya have internal and external implications for Somalia. If the quality of life in Djibouti and Somalia is better than in Ethiopia, which is very likely, Djibouti and Somalia will experience a significant influx of Ethiopians, which will, as I pointed out earlier, transform the ethnic boundaries of Somaliness. On the one hand, due to their large numbers in Kenya and Ethiopia, Somalis will influence the political dynamics of both countries. In other words, the Somali-speaking population will play a role in transforming the region’s political and identity dynamics.Conclusion The Horn of Africa is probably in the midst of its second great migration, one that will parallel or eclipse the sixteenth-century migration that cemented the region’s current settlement and identity patterns. Despite the lack of written record, this sixteenth century migration was spearheaded by the so-called great Somali migration waves that pushed the Oromo communities further upward into the Ethiopian highlands. This migration, which was allegedly stopped by the British colonial administration in the early decades of the twentieth century, is credited with the current identity settlement patterns of the region. The migration of Somali people may have been caused by long droughts and clan warfare. I suspect similar conditions are at play in the region today, except that this time, the migration push may not just come from Somalia, but all sides. The most important component of this modern migration may be the emigration from Ethiopia to Somalia. A new factor in the current migration is the possibility of increased interdependency between Ethiopia, Somalia, and Kenya, which will simultaneously make economic opportunities, not ethnic identities, into the primary motive of settlement patterns and increase the interdependency of the countries’ political and economic structures.These processes will probably have the greatest effect on Somalia and Djibouti. Because Somalia and Djibouti have two of the smallest populations in the region, significant Ethiopian emigration will certainly increase the ethnic composition and diversity of both Somalia and Djibouti. My purpose is not to suggest that migration and demographic transformations are inherently a problem. To the contrary, it is, in fact, an engine for social change and economic development for the entire region. But my ultimate purpose is to gently force Somali scholarship out of the ostrich syndrome and to embrace the methodological imagination that will allow it to understand the Somali condition from a context increasingly characterized by continuous and dynamic social and demographic transformations.A federal monitor overseeing changes to the police department's stop-and-frisk program said in a progress report Tuesday the department has done good work setting new policy but putting it into practice will be a challenge.A federal judge ruled in 2013 that the practice of stopping people and frisking them violated the civil rights of minorities, many of whom sued. Monitor Peter Zimroth said in a report to the judge that the New York Police Department (NYPD) has distributed a new patrol guide that prohibits biased-based policing and put into use new training for recruits and current officers. A new stop-report form is being tested."The progress the report details owes much to the hard work of NYPD officials and valuable input from the plaintiffs," Zimroth wrote. "All the parties worked diligently, collaboratively, and in good faith."But the challenge will be to ensure the written changes are carried out. Zimroth said he's discovered in focus groups that many officers and higher-ups don't understand what's expected of them and are unaware of the changes. The message "needs to be communicated and reinforced better, not just at the top, but throughout the department," he wrote.Street stops were down to about 24,000 last year, from a high of 685,724 in 2011. Most of the people stopped are black and Hispanic men, and fewer than 10 percent are arrested. But the judge did not outlaw the practice, and Zimroth said that part of the reform must be to make sure the practice is done correctly."Getting it right means this: that police officers understand their lawful authority and limit their activities to what is permitted by law," he wrote.And it means officers don't avoid enforcement activity when appropriate. He reported many officers feel concerned they will be sued or disciplined for making a stop. He said officers must also treat the community members professionally, "with dignity and respect."He said the task is large and will take time to accomplish.At a federal trial, nearly a dozen black and Hispanic men told firsthand accounts of frightening encounters with police officers who stopped and sometimes frisked them but didn't arrest them. They said they were targeted because they were minorities.The NYPD, the nation's biggest police department, said Zimroth's report will help with its ongoing training program."The NYPD's overall stop, question and frisk review continues to be a 'work-in-progress' in collaboration with the Monitor and other interested parties," it said in a statement. "The Department's training in connection with this issue is well underway both at the police academy recruit level as well as through our on-going in-service training in the various field commands."Democratic Mayor Bill de Blasio's administration dropped the city's appeal of the case when he took office, and he andpolicCommissioner William Bratton have said the policy was overused and created mistrust between police and the community.President Barack Obama said Tuesday he would nominate a candidate to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court who is "indisputably" qualified. He called on the staunch Republican opposition in the Senate to rise above "venom and rancor" and vote on confirming the nominee."I intend to do my job between now and Jan. 20 of 2017," he said. "I expect them to do their job as well."Obama told reporters at a news conference in his first extended comments on the fight over filling the seat left empty by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.Obama cast the dispute as a question of how far Republicans want to push their opposition and whether the Senate can function in the hyperpoliticized climate. Fights over judicial nominations are not new, he noted, but "the Supreme Court's different.""This will be a test, one more test of whether or not norms, rules, basic fair play can function at all in Washington these days," he said.Obama spoke as he closed a meeting of Southeast Asian leaders at Sunnylands, a Southern California desert retreat. Obama gathered ASEAN members for two days of talks on security and counterterrorism efforts.But the president's attention was divided. Since Scalia's unexpected death at a remote Texas ranch on Saturday, White House lawyers and advisers have been scrambling to refine and vet a list of potential replacements, while also devising a strategy to push a candidate through the Republican-led Senate.Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has said he doesn't think Obama should be putting a candidate forward. McConnell and several Republican senators up for re-election this year,say Obama should leave the choice up to the next president. The November election, they argue, will give voters a chance to weigh in on the direction of the court.Obama dismissed that notion. He has said he will put forward a replacement in due time and that he believes the Senate will have "plenty of time" to give the nominee a fair hearing and a vote. Democrats say Obama has every right and a constitutional duty to fill vacancies on the court until he leaves office Jan. 20, 2017. The Republicans' recommended solution is "irresponsible, and it's unprecedented," Sen. Pat Leahy, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Tuesday. "The American public expects us to do the job we're elected to do. The president is going to do what he is elected to do and let's vote up or down."The dispute reflects years of escalating partisan hostilities over judicial nominations, as well as the unusual timing.The pace of lower court confirmations always slows in a presidential election year, as the party that does not control the White House prefers to hold out hope that its nominee will fill vacant judgeships rather than give lifetime tenure to the other party's choices.But Supreme Court vacancies in presidential years are rare, in part because the justices avoid retiring when prospects for confirming successors are uncertain.If Senate Republicans hold fast to their vow not to confirm anyone Obama nominates, then the Supreme Court will operate with eight justices not just for the rest of this court term, but for most of the next one as well. High court terms begin in October, and the 80 or so cases argued in the course of a term typically are decided by early summer.The court will be unable to issue nationwide rulings on any issue in which the justices split 4-4. The bombing of two schools and five hospitals in Syria allegedly by Russian warplanes has been slammed as a “war crime,” as the ongoing bloodshed diminished hopes for a cease-fire in the conflict.Up to 50 civilians, including children, died when missiles hit at least five medical buildings and two schools in the Aleppo and Idlib provinces on Monday.U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said the raids violated international law and “cast a shadow” over efforts to end Syria's five-year civil war. He did not say who was responsible for the attacks but groups monitoring the conflict suspected the strikes were carried out by Russia, an ally of the Syrian regime.Russia’s Health Minister Veronika Skvortsova denied Moscow was responsible, saying its military had targeted Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) infrastructure and that she had no reason to believe it had bombed civilians.“We are confident that [there is] no way it could be done by our defense forces. This contradicts our ideology,” she said.French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault said attacks on health facilities in Syria by the regime or its supporters were “unacceptable and must stop immediately.”Turkey on Monday separately accused Russia of “an obvious war crime” and warned that there would be consequences if Russia did not immediately end such attacks.Syria's ambassador to Moscow, Riad Haddad, said the hospital was targeted by a U.S. raid. “American warplanes destroyed it. Russian warplanes had nothing to do with any of it. The information that has been gathered will completely back that up,” he told Russian state television channel Rossiya 24.The U.S., which, like the U.N., did not specify who carried out the strikes, said two civilian hospitals were hit in northern Syria: one run by medical charity Doctors Without Borders and another in rebel-held Azaz.“That the Assad regime and its supporters would continue these attacks … casts doubt on Russia's willingness and/or ability to help bring to a stop the continued brutality of the Assad regime against its own people,” the U.S. State Department said. Syrian President Bashar Assad warned Turkey and Saudi Arabia that any ground invasion of Syria would have “global repercussions” and said sending in troops would not be a “picnic.”Commenting on an agreement brokered last week by the U.S., Russia and other world powers for a temporary cessation of hostilities, he said, “Cease-fires occur between armies and states but never between a state and terrorists.”“They say that they want a cease-fire within a week. All right, who will talk to a terrorist organization if it refuses to cease-fire? Who will punish it?”Assad's comments were his first since the agreement on Friday to bring about a pause in fighting within a week.Earlier this month, Saudi Arabia and the UAE said they were prepared to send ground troops to Syria to fight ISIL if a U.S.-led coalition targeting the group with airstrikes agreed to the offer.Russia warned that if foreign troops entered the country, it could lead to a world war. when they repatriate their foreign earnings.Ndaruzaniye, 2011)
