Fatherhood

Data from more than 40 million births showed that babies born to fathers of an “advanced paternal age,” which roughly equates to older than 35, were at a higher risk for adverse birth outcomes"



Why do we always talk about women, when men are also affected?
 

Mozart

You need people like me
Because it simply isn't the same thing lol for women at 45 it's a roulette. You may have kids or you may not.

The researcher in that paper says " Still, these numbers aren’t reason to drastically change any life plans, as the risks are still relatively low".

You should also note the changes are relative and not absolute.
 
"Still, these numbers aren’t reason to drastically change any life plans, as the risks are still relatively low, Eisenberg said. He compared the increased risks to buying lottery tickets. “If you buy two lottery tickets instead of one, your chances of winning double, so it’s increased by 100 percent,” he said. “But that’s a relative increase. Because your chance of winning the lottery started very small, it’s still unlikely that you’re going to win the lottery. This is a very extreme example, but the same concept can be applied to how you think about these birth risks. "

It's like going from a 0.001% chance to a 0.0023% chance - I don't think you can compare the two, tbh.
 
You wish it was the same for men and women dont you? The over 35 year old single xalimos can go to somalia to greencard a husband cuz no western farax is wifing that for sure. What are we gunna do with some barely fertile eggs
 
Because it simply isn't the same thing lol for women at 45 it's a roulette. You may have kids or you may not.

The researcher in that paper says " Still, these numbers aren’t reason to drastically change any life plans, as the risks are still relatively low". You should also note the changes are relative and not absolute.

Women in their 30s are still able to get pregnant, men know it, yet time and time again they love to use the autism argument when it is the same for men, if not worse.

There is no denying that men are fertile a lot longer, but that isn't the argument here as women in their 30s are perfectly fertile as well.
 

Mozart

You need people like me
Women in their 30s are still able to get pregnant, men know it, yet time and time again they love to use the autism argument when it is the same for men, if not worse.

There is no denying that men are fertile a lot longer, but that isn't the argument here as women in their 30s are perfectly fertile as well.
Prove that using data. It seems like you just want to rant loool for whoever offened you, I apologise.
 
You wish it was the same for men and women dont you? The over 35 year old single xalimos can go to somalia to greencard a husband cuz no western farax is wifing that for sure. What are we gunna do with some barely fertile eggs

That isn't the whole point. No need to get in the defensive. 35+ women get married all the time saxib. Its even normal for elder and divorced women to get married in our culture. So I don't know what you are talking about.
 
"Still, these numbers aren’t reason to drastically change any life plans, as the risks are still relatively low, Eisenberg said. He compared the increased risks to buying lottery tickets. “If you buy two lottery tickets instead of one, your chances of winning double, so it’s increased by 100 percent,” he said. “But that’s a relative increase. Because your chance of winning the lottery started very small, it’s still unlikely that you’re going to win the lottery. This is a very extreme example, but the same concept can be applied to how you think about these birth risks. "

It's like going from a 0.001% chance to a 0.0023% chance - I don't think you can compare the two, tbh.

Its the same for women, it doesn't stop men from throwing it around.
 

Chun Li

under construction 😈💖
It’s the multiple jumpoffs, fucking that airhead club , asking for a cocktail of STDs freshly served with lime, fucking on the first night after a Tinder date niggas that wonder why their baby ends up with a cleft lip & cystic fibrosis. But they wanna blame it on their devout Church girl :deadmanny:
 
Women in their 30s are still able to get pregnant, men know it, yet time and time again they love to use the autism argument when it is the same for men, if not worse.

There is no denying that men are fertile a lot longer, but that isn't the argument here as women in their 30s are perfectly fertile as well.

Screenshot (3637).png

Non-Growing_Follicles.png
 
Unlike women men don't have a biological clock so I think that's why its overlooked.

Women in their 30s are perfectly Fertile and they know it, which is why the love to throw the autism card, when it is the same for them.

The older they get, the more their sperm quality deteriorates.
 
Last edited:
That isn't the whole point. No need to get in the defensive. 35+ women get married all the time saxib. Its even normal for elder and divorced women to get married in our culture. So I don't know what you are talking about.
Married to bums yeah? Cuz at that point their options are extremely diminished compared to their early 20s lets be real
 

Boogie

Islam wins doesnt take Ls Long Live Somalia 🇸🇴
Doesnt work for our awoowes they have so much kid even when they old
 
If a sister meets the right man in her 30s instead of 20s then why should she be shamed for it ? Fate can't be forced. It's the will of Allah.

More and more Somali women are getting married in their late 20s early 30s. I'm not saying its a good thing as many would have loved to have married earlier, but many still marry decent Abdis.

I have a few cousins as well who have married late and their husbands are far from bums.
 
Last edited:
Top