How Bantus will take over Somalia
- Thread starter Ali Dheere
- Start date
- Status
Another bantu thread
paragon
Keeping it Real Since 01/01/90
I've read their history and they claim their movement from into the East African Great Lakes region is how they learned about farming and animal husbandry from the agropastralist nilotes and cushites. They claim to have absorbed this population through willing 'inter-marriage' and frame it like it was a mutually beneficial process. I don't see anything the nilotes or cushites that lived there gained. When they went into South Africa they contributed to the building of Great Zimbabwe. However, they do not mention the drop in Khosian numbers came before European colonization but was mere exacerbated by it. They don't mention their enslavement of the Pygmies in congo, forced marriages and cannibalism. To put it simply, the stock they come from aims to absorb. They don't know how to keep to their side of Africa and stay there, but instead have a colonial mindset just like western Europeans.
They're no different from the Cadaan Europeans who entered North America and wiped out the Natives. It didn't happen overnight.
In fact, the annihilation of the Natives was a centuries-long process but where are the Alibastains now? You can't find them anywhere. These people are colonists and imperialists plain and simple.
LOOOOL!!! 100% true.
Land of Punt
Punt is an cushtic empire located in the horn
BANTUS INCOMING
paragon
Keeping it Real Since 01/01/90
Some people want to sweep this under the rug and pretend they can do no harm. They have your sympathetic and naive ears. And this whole black agenda, is really a Niger-Congo washing of the continent. Just because New World blacks are a melting pot of West and Central Africans does not mean that we want the same for Africa. That would get rid of whatever phenotypical diversity we have left.
That's why I want no part. It's one thing to have work together with aligned economic interests but co-mingling outside of business is out of the picture. It's best our uniqueness and differences be preserved, not obscured. After all, we are not like Europeans that share a close ancestor as early as 1000 years ago. You can't say that for Africans which are more distant in genetic relatedness.
I only care about my people and their continued survival. And I'm not above teaming up with the Xabeshi, since they have a similar agenda. Only because their numbers are strong i.e. Oromo and because an enemy of my enemy is my ally, we are in no way friends with Ethiopia we simply have a few common interests. Only problem is they have snake behavior, so you have to keep a look out. That and they are also no friend but I'd choose to keep the Somali Peninsula away from another expansion of people we share little with and if that means putting down grievances temporarily - that's ok for now. Since, what creeps into Somalia can and will also adversely impact them. Also, many Somalis reside there. And it would help to be on the same page.
And what makes it worse is that if we Somalis object to being colonized and dominated by the numerically superior Bantus, then we're labeled as hateful or racists. That's what pisses me off the most.
They're using the language of compassion to get us to allow our eventual colonization. At least if we lost our territory through warfare then it would be more honorable since they would be upfront about their intentions on taking our land. But instead of actually battling it out, they want to use shaming tactics to get us to concede to the loss of our only homeland. Somalis really have no other country to go too.
The Arabs have 25 countries. The Bantus have 27 countries. The Europeans have over 40 countries. We Somalis only have the Horn of Africa yet we could possibly lose that in the face of this onslaught.
And if we object to this. If we object to the annihilation of our ethnic group and culture, we're labeled as racist. SMFH
They're using the language of compassion to get us to allow our eventual colonization. At least if we lost our territory through warfare then it would be more honorable since they would be upfront about their intentions on taking our land. But instead of actually battling it out, they want to use shaming tactics to get us to concede to the loss of our only homeland. Somalis really have no other country to go too.
The Arabs have 25 countries. The Bantus have 27 countries. The Europeans have over 40 countries. We Somalis only have the Horn of Africa yet we could possibly lose that in the face of this onslaught.
And if we object to this. If we object to the annihilation of our ethnic group and culture, we're labeled as racist. SMFH
These Somali SJW's subconsciously view them to be inferior, hence why they stick up for them all the time.
If large numbers of Arabs were to flood into Somalia, you're damn right I'd be pissed off about it. If large amounts of Indians or Europeans were to flood into Somalia then I would be standing right alongside the Somali SJW's in protesting this development. But if large amounts of Bantus flood into Somalia, these people are strangely silent.
Why? What's with this double standard? Why is one okay but not the other?
I'll tell you why they're silent: It's because they subconsciously view them to not be a threat, because they believe them to be incapable of behaving in the same way as the Arabs or Indians or Europeans, viewing them to be harmless children who can do no harm. It's patronizing and frankly quite degrading actually, and patronization is the worst form of racism.
If large numbers of Arabs were to flood into Somalia, you're damn right I'd be pissed off about it. If large amounts of Indians or Europeans were to flood into Somalia then I would be standing right alongside the Somali SJW's in protesting this development. But if large amounts of Bantus flood into Somalia, these people are strangely silent.
Why? What's with this double standard? Why is one okay but not the other?
I'll tell you why they're silent: It's because they subconsciously view them to not be a threat, because they believe them to be incapable of behaving in the same way as the Arabs or Indians or Europeans, viewing them to be harmless children who can do no harm. It's patronizing and frankly quite degrading actually, and patronization is the worst form of racism.
angrycat
not so sad after all
Exactly this is what ppl does seem to get, its just pity. sjw and liberals seem to view the black race as being inferior.
really, even AAs, i wish they would get some pride and not stick on to this slave history to guilt white people and it only harms them more, smh
really, even AAs, i wish they would get some pride and not stick on to this slave history to guilt white people and it only harms them more, smh
SomaliSteel
No dictator can imprison a population forever.
Bantu is a generalized term for over 500 separate ethnic groups, they are grouped by language called the Bantu languages. They cannot take over Somalia as they are few in number, even before the war. Now many have left the country.
I wish you;d have this logic with your people in South Africa. Yet when they don't want you in their land you cry Xenophobia.
C
Caddey
Guest
Are they really taking over? Aren't they a minority
- Status
