Many men on here and elsewhere are now talking about sexual imprint , why?
- Thread starter hannah54321
- Start date
It's pretty important. InshaAllah if I continue to be a virgin until marriage, I'd want my wife to be the same. I think what men fear is being lied to, and finding out somewhere down the road that your wife had a sexual encounter in the past(voluntarily of course). Not only would it feel unfair, but it would feel disgusting.
Molotoff
VIP
He is right.
This is that albanian guy that complained about albanian women? Was a thread a time ago.
Same people shouldn’t be hypocrites
Marshall D Abdi
Know you’re place peasant
What ur point? Thats someone past shouldnt concern u or u mean its double moral to only to call out women?
whats ur point here?
whats ur point here?
No In another thread someone posted that there’s a biological imprint left on a women , so when people say imprint I’m wondering what they mean
It's pseudoscience. It has been proven a bit with some insect species from what I gather like this study these chaps keep linking:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
But it has never been proven in Humans and, as far as I know, I have never heard of someone whose DNA and traits weren't 100% derived from their biological mother and father. It's just a way of shaming women in particular into not having previous sexual partners which is sad because this logic can even be used against a perfectly religious and conservative woman whose only past partner was her ex-husband.
Revisiting telegony: offspring inherit an acquired characteristic of their mother's previous mate - PMC
Newly discovered non-genetic mechanisms break the link between genes and inheritance, thereby also raising the possibility that previous mating partners could influence traits in offspring sired by subsequent males that mate with the same female ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
But it has never been proven in Humans and, as far as I know, I have never heard of someone whose DNA and traits weren't 100% derived from their biological mother and father. It's just a way of shaming women in particular into not having previous sexual partners which is sad because this logic can even be used against a perfectly religious and conservative woman whose only past partner was her ex-husband.
BobSmoke
Flying over your heads
It means you tend to be attracted to a type.
Like how battered women stay dating an abusive man after another. Like how some women keep dating fucc boys or womanizer and she don't understand why. It's because of the imprint.
The imprint is beyond just biological, its also psychological. She can't help but to be attracted to these types that she had sex with before.
Let's just say Miss Liz had her fun in college with the frat boys and later down the road she decides to marry John the shy honest guy who works with computers.
She will enjoy the marriage until she starts to get to know her personal trainer. They will sweat, breathe and exert energy in the gym. She will grow attached to him because of the vibes the trainer gives off reminded her of the old fun days, and also because of a thing called transference.
Transference is an energetic exchange caused by either physical therapy or when someone opens up emotionally and psychologically.
It is the reason why patients tend to perversely fall for their therapists.
A lot of psychologists and therapists tend to have sex with their patients when the transference from their patients gets reciprocated
bobsburger
I am NOT a federal agent
h0es are unstable compared to clean girls.
They have a tendency to jump ship quickly and not be fully committed in a marriage.
They have a tendency to jump ship quickly and not be fully committed in a marriage.
Desert Flower
VIP
Like @Shimbiris said, it’s suugo science and a way to shame women. It’s not even about the deen at this point.
Wow. @Nak-Muay-Kru u r really something walaahi
By the way, there is nothing 'imprint" about anything. Girls do not get attracted to your articulate chubby Mr. Nice guy image. They like a bad boy. Plain and simple. Its Biological.
Take Queen Elizabeth of UK for instance. She had a choice to marry any man she wanted. Princes and Amirs. & Sultans
She chose a good looking blonde boy player or womanizer prince Phillip for herself. Yes it is biological. Is it logical? NO. I agree with YOU
Last edited:
It’s a very dangerous game to take a woman with a past. High risk of failure.
BobSmoke
Flying over your heads
You definitely got me mixed up with someone else
But hey, as long as you see me as a lame chubby Mr Nice Guy then we all good Mr Sister
Btw choose a better example next time. An example thats not a borderline fossil
Men preferring virgins has been a thing throughout basically all of human history. Protesting against it would be like protesting against the sun being hot or protesting against women liking handsome men.
That being said, it's not actually Islamically wrong to marry a woman with "experience". It's just a matter of preference amongst many men.
Another thing is I don't like this "simp" word. The whole "simp" word and concept is alien. For 1,400 years, I don't know of Muslims having this concept. The whole concept is used to shame men for being nice to women and is an import from "red pill," mgtow type culture, which imported it from AA "player" type culture.
I don't think these foreign ideologies like feminism or "red pill"/mgtow should be mixed in with Islam. If you imbalance things too much in one direction, it invites the opposite extreme. I think people should be in the middle and not lean too much towards extremes in either direction.
That being said, it's not actually Islamically wrong to marry a woman with "experience". It's just a matter of preference amongst many men.
Another thing is I don't like this "simp" word. The whole "simp" word and concept is alien. For 1,400 years, I don't know of Muslims having this concept. The whole concept is used to shame men for being nice to women and is an import from "red pill," mgtow type culture, which imported it from AA "player" type culture.
I don't think these foreign ideologies like feminism or "red pill"/mgtow should be mixed in with Islam. If you imbalance things too much in one direction, it invites the opposite extreme. I think people should be in the middle and not lean too much towards extremes in either direction.
You definitely got me mixed up with someone else
But hey, as long as you see me as a lame chubby Mr Nice Guy then we all good Mr Sister
Btw choose a better example next time. An example thats not a borderline fossil
I chose queen Beth for a purpose. She is a queen, had more choices, she seem like the typical good girl type, literally, never went any where without escort. Most definitely was virgin. But she chooses the man furthest from being Virgin. loool
