Modern Day Politics. Developed World Vs Developing World

[DR OSMAN]

The developed world politics is much older and grounded in a longer history or at least one with some national memory either written or traditions that serves as the rule of law which their locals believe in, from this stabilising foundation of a rule of law(constitution or monarchy) it has public confidence and their national politics is grounded in ideas and they debate it with intelligence before putting it up for their locals to decide thru a contest called elections.

This has given them the breathing space to develop and not worry about internal instability or putting out fires locally or spending so much of their budget on prisons, police, military(to ward of foreign nations who want to capitalise on their vulnerability.

You could argue they have have alot of social ills such as identity politics, discrimination, media and business or other special interest groups who play a behind the scene role and yes it's probably corruption that is just underplayed or overlooked by the society.

But the developed world which I class as anything not having a rule of law that is supported with confidence by all sections of its society and is only a nation in name only or thru the barrel of the gun, these nations don't have strong stabilising foundations and will forever be prone to interference whether locally or foreign who knows this because if your people don't feel their state is in their interest it's bound to become fragile and only time is the question and what geopolitical interest is keeping that rogue state with no public cobfidence alive.

But the developed world is also not politics grounded in ideas or contest but it's more about identity politics(sectarian, religious, ethnic, caste, clan, or anything social based) it's definitely not politics grounded in ideas for the betterment of the society economic, security, education sort of politics. Their more concerned with keeping the state alive from internal vulnerability and foreign interference these developing countries which is a key marker I have spotted.

Their govt are always run by some dictator or thru some democracy in name only elections but identity politics is at the core of their bogus elections. They also seem to always use the state for purposes such as land dispossession of other internal groups they deem hostile, use puppets or Trojans to interfere with the targetted group or region.

They basically just thugs in my view the developed world politics who use politics as a means to gain more land holdings of other internal groups who are not in power or they use it to build up animosity by pitting ruling class on the non ruling class in their lands(isku dir). All this is done because the state is basically inherited from colonial legacy is my suspicion and they haven't formed a real national identity internally and only use it externally outside its borders as everyone is more loyal to their pre existing social identity before colonialism.

They also suffer the severest form of personal, family, cronyism interests guiding their leadership with identity politics all mixed into it and lack of a rule of law with public confidence to make up their deadly cocktail of a state.

That's DR Osman view of the developed and developing world politics

 

[TheLand]

Where is your qabiilist Russell Crowe podcast, or are you too embarrassed to do a podcast all on your own? We can’t read this psycho babble. Start a podcast with alcoholic futo-weyne @Libaax-Joore. You can call it ‘fkd on the spectrum’ or something

 

[DR OSMAN]

Where is your qabiilist Russell Crowe podcast, or are you too embarrassed to do a podcast all on your own? We can’t read this psycho babble. Start a podcast with alcoholic futo-weyne @Libaax-Joore. You can call it ‘fkd on the spectrum’ or something

Sxb why you calling me a psycho? If U can't read it maybe U got dyslexia and their treatment available bro? Denial isn't treatment tho or deflecting to character abuse.

 

[cunug3aad]

Aad iyo aad iyo wax kale the democracy you find in the developed nations evolved on its own as A result of the conditions the country found itself in and thus its system of governance is best suited. However the democracy of developing countries was shoehorned in to give the people "human rights" maxaa democracy iyo freeedom of religion ee wax dowlad la yirahdo ma hayso ? the dowlad should be another one of their human rights then everyone can agree on how stupid it is to enforce expectations on corrupt wartorn countries that have nothing to do with them

Dimuqraatiga somaliya waxaa ku dhigay taliyaanka iyo ingriiska labadoodana waa dal yurub and theyre establishing an african muslim state with their ideals so obviously the first governmnent is corrupt and ineffective then siyaad bare hes take over and fix some issues lakn weli maskaxkiis qurunay the ideas that the europe put onto him so his secularst litle african country way burburtay and then marka awal oo dowlad somaali ay jirtay ee icu maxkamada. In my opinion if the icu was left to itself it would easily stabilise and make the country prosperous but you have to sacrifice some human rights first before you can get there and give it back and thats where every country has been stopped from prosperity. Waan maleyaa in dhamaanta dadku maxaa ku xigay uu yaqaano

The ideals of the west are all false and illusion anyway for example free speech it seems unbounded compared to the speech you can do in other countries but it has limit still, like for example there is laws against hate speech and other intolerance because fully unrestricted speech allows people to speak their way into restricting the speech again. waxay la yaqaana Intolerance paradox Also free speech just means speech and words is worth less than ever they even make in places like london waxaa jiraa speakers corner they throw all the dissenters in a corner and tell them to dissent there then they leave them like herding cow

The western world also had family politics in europe However the families were controlling a countries of peasants and serfs who had no property no xoolo no human rights. So they were worse than us for the every day person. Nowadays instead of royal family the ariatocrscy has taken the form of the elites with political influence even that is an illusion because people think a serf or peasant yacni xamaali boy like them can get to the levels of this elite ama aristocracy. They have fully pacified the general public and can do what ever they like and the people must follow

 

[DR OSMAN]

Aad iyo aad iyo wax kale the democracy you find in the developed nations evolved on its own as A result of the conditions the country found itself in and thus its system of governance is best suited. However the democracy of developing countries was shoehorned in to give the people "human rights" maxaa democracy iyo freeedom of religion ee wax dowlad la yirahdo ma hayso ? the dowlad should be another one of their human rights then everyone can agree on how stupid it is to enforce expectations on corrupt wartorn countries that have nothing to do with them

Dimuqraatiga somaliya waxaa ku dhigay taliyaanka iyo ingriiska labadoodana waa dal yurub and theyre establishing an african muslim state with their ideals so obviously the first governmnent is corrupt and ineffective then siyaad bare hes take over and fix some issues lakn weli maskaxkiis qurunay the ideas that the europe put onto him so his secularst litle african country way burburtay and then marka awal oo dowlad somaali ay jirtay ee icu maxkamada. In my opinion if the icu was left to itself it would easily stabilise and make the country prosperous but you have to sacrifice some human rights first before you can get there and give it back and thats where every country has been stopped from prosperity. Waan maleyaa in dhamaanta dadku maxaa ku xigay uu yaqaano

The ideals of the west are all false and illusion anyway for example free speech it seems unbounded compared to the speech you can do in other countries but it has limit still, like for example there is laws against hate speech and other intolerance because fully unrestricted speech allows people to speak their way into restricting the speech again. waxay la yaqaana Intolerance paradox Also free speech just means speech and words is worth less than ever they even make in places like london waxaa jiraa speakers corner they throw all the dissenters in a corner and tell them to dissent there then they leave them like herding cow

The western world also had family politics in europe However the families were controlling a countries of peasants and serfs who had no property no xoolo no human rights. So they were worse than us for the every day person. Nowadays instead of royal family the ariatocrscy has taken the form of the elites with political influence even that is an illusion because people think a serf or peasant yacni xamaali boy like them can get to the levels of this elite ama aristocracy. They have fully pacified the general public and can do what ever they like and the people must follow

Yes I was studying this serf and peasantry who these people descend from. This a brutal system as they were not allowed to have land holdings and could only rent their land from the aristocracy who itself reported to the royal family who took its slice of the production of the serfs and peasant.

The people don't even count their names and preserve their names and lineage nor is it even remembered even if you speak to them today in the modern world they have no clue who their third grandfather is cause he didn't matter in the royal system of serfs and peasants.

The serf system is still in practise today called modern day economy or occupations and even their names are linked to occupations, their not seen as really humans but just shaqaale or slave.

They even till today when they greet you with hi how are you the next question is what is your occupation showing the devastating legacy is still in practise just modernized and rebadged thru marketing. They even call their land holding owners land lords and the renter's are called Tenants(another word for serf).

Even if they do own land sxb these peasant or serfs it's usually not prime land but some desolate rural land or some small block in prime land holdings which is usually not even theirs unless it's for sleeping purposes or residential. The second they perform any economic activity on it, they must pay the govt it's share plus they can't do as they please and need approvals from govt, council, state, etc who are just rebadged aristocrats in other titles.

Free speech is huge gain for these serfs and peasants as u said because they were not even allowed to speak and were neaderthals status, they assume all cultures are like theirs which is more of their ignorance showing.

 

[cunug3aad]

Free speech is huge gain for these serfs and peasants as u said because they were not even allowed to speak and were neaderthals status, they assume all cultures are like theirs which is more of their ignorance showing.

I think that free speech isnt the gain for these people like they think but rather the free speeche is used to suppress them. Before speech in general had rules that cannot transgress like insulting or critosizing rulers or violating the modesty and ceeb of the society and dissention and stuff. so When someone was speaking out that his speech in itself is indicating a shift in the paradigm and the speech is worth way more than it ever would today

Compared to today when all of those thing can be said by anyone at anytime now anyone can go out into thr street any day and start dissenting about some random thing and nothing will happen to him. The state does not acknowledge this persons existence as a threat and thus he will not become a threat if he is not acknowledged. Do you notice the western news wills broadcast about every single dissent worldwide be it pakistan or afghanistan or iran or china or somalia or general africa or brazil or anything Except for dissent within the west. They news wants you to think that they care about your dissent but reality waa they will not give even a moment to you of attention

I attribute the decline of poetry and the literary arts in the west to free speech, these words that the people are speaking have no worth to them anymore since anyone can speak them, even historically in somalia we see all of the notable gabay are written at time of conflict or war or strife or struggle like waraabe iyo wan and those of ahmed gurey or any sort of aano qabiil and the art nowadays despite its still relevant its becoming less relevant day to day and im worried that the future somalida will not attach any value to words. This is how it is in the west where only small number of people care to study the language properly and the rest of people dont even listen to the poems or prose let alone be involved in it because they see the words these people speaking and saying well its just words why should i care But they should absolutely care about words. The west is the wrong way around

 

[Jaffar]

Detoore stands as the singular intellect on this platform a mind of exceptional brilliance and discernment. His intellect shines with such distinction that one might well suggest he is eminently suited to the office of President of the Somali republic of even Puntland.

 

[DR OSMAN]

I think that free speech isnt the gain for these people like they think but rather the free speeche is used to suppress them. Before speech in general had rules that cannot transgress like insulting or critosizing rulers or violating the modesty and ceeb of the society and dissention and stuff. so When someone was speaking out that his speech in itself is indicating a shift in the paradigm and the speech is worth way more than it ever would today

Compared to today when all of those thing can be said by anyone at anytime now anyone can go out into thr street any day and start dissenting about some random thing and nothing will happen to him. The state does not acknowledge this persons existence as a threat and thus he will not become a threat if he is not acknowledged. Do you notice the western news wills broadcast about every single dissent worldwide be it pakistan or afghanistan or iran or china or somalia or general africa or brazil or anything Except for dissent within the west. They news wants you to think that they care about your dissent but reality waa they will not give even a moment to you of attention

I attribute the decline of poetry and the literary arts in the west to free speech, these words that the people are speaking have no worth to them anymore since anyone can speak them, even historically in somalia we see all of the notable gabay are written at time of conflict or war or strife or struggle like waraabe iyo wan and those of ahmed gurey or any sort of aano qabiil and the art nowadays despite its still relevant its becoming less relevant day to day and im worried that the future somalida will not attach any value to words. This is how it is in the west where only small number of people care to study the language properly and the rest of people dont even listen to the poems or prose let alone be involved in it because they see the words these people speaking and saying well its just words why should i care But they should absolutely care about words. The west is the wrong way around

Don't wake them up. The west and in general most people nowadays as you noted just speak or use words to be heard but it has no intrinsic worth and is just noise, infact it's better to listen to animal sounds when you see some so called humans,

I really think it's wrong to assume anyone who is anatomically human is spiritually or mentally human(I am despised as a psycho for saying these valid points that some humans are just neaderthals or archaic humans dressed up in modern day attire, you can even see(physical limbs is neaderthal in alot or mentally when they talk u can see it's neaderthal noise), even mentally they lack imagination or creativity and have to be taught everything like how to think or read or write or carry out a work.

I really do believe the neaderthal or previous archaic humans(in Asia) their failed genetics are rampant in modern days humans from interbreeding, they have the worst semen quality and count usually, theyre population pool hosts all the functional retards by the bucket loads. They can never be creative, spiritual. Abstract as u demand of them in poetry or any field or teach themselves anything. They must always be trained like monkeys of the past.

These people need to wear make up constantly, create good day pictures and images on media, look at them in real natural state and u see another story. Just look at their poor people vs the rest of the world poor people, U see a clear difference. I am starting to lose my patience with them personally and want to use my adamic gift on these neaderthals like modern man did.

Think of neaderthal or archaic primates as basically some human who is severely mentally and spiritually unaware of as we call them today have a disorder of their motor skills, which ironically is rampant in non Africans societies who were exposed to interbreeding effects of archaic humans. When I go to the mosque you will see how they even pollute the Qur'an with their genetic deficiencies.

 

[DR OSMAN]

They even call 18 year old children in the west, when 7 and 8 year olds are hustling side jobs for their family while going to school and is dead set managing the family budget and household by 9.

They just want to conceal their people are Neaderthal genetically and their current body is effected from a low(2%) to high(5%) range and it usually all centered in their brain chemistry, which can explain the lack of abstract, creativity, spirituality, etc and why they must only be managed under a greek logic framework

 

[DR OSMAN]

@cunug3aad

These neaderthals use the scary face, artificial and synthetic proteins on their body which is(empty of real nutrients) to create a Goliath like appearance when in fact if U really want 3D U could destroy him being skinny and scrawny as all jaws are the same. U just need to use your speed, long reach and measure how far back, forward, side and side he goes which is neaderthal style and keep focused on jaw line and temple, make sure ur knuckle is trained more then your biceps as bicel as has no use in a fight

I admire Deontay Wilders long reach, where as neaderthal bulked people have short reach and their bodies are full of fake artificial proteins, their basically plastic their bodies. Nowadays the problem isn't hand combat, that's just bruises which will heal, it's knives n guns which leave a permanent mark or damage, so I wouldn't go just go willy nilly picking fights.

The other thing is we need to learn how to turn street fights into prize fights for Somali diaspora in America and the UK. In Melbourne U need to put up a car, cash, ,house, or something tangible for Africans to fight, they go Pitbull then since their is a real incentive not just showmanship and ego in public which doesn't pull our feather but the other thing is once it's a prize fight it's not illegal violence so no prison time l,is it can be pay day also lol

 

[TheLand]

Sxb why you calling me a psycho? If U can't read it maybe U got dyslexia and their treatment available bro? Denial isn't treatment tho or deflecting to character abuse.

Didnt you once want to do organ harvesting on certain qabiils?

 

[DR OSMAN]

Didnt you once want to do organ harvesting on certain qabiils?

I still do stand by that statement, it's called recycling which humans can be recycled also well physically anyways. The amount of dead bodies in Somalia, the supply is plentiful, the business model is sound, U just need to legalise it so it's not done thru maqaffe or illegal actors who are even resorting to kidnapping people alive for the trade, which I do not condone that method, what I do condone is if he is already dead, U got permission from his relatives who probably will say yes when they get a fee for it, plus his organs can be used to preserve high productive people who are on long waiting list for surgeriesglobally who the world needs.

Where as that unproductive nigga was just an burden all his life in Somalia to his family, friend, community and nation. I also suggest a similar model for dead Somalis in the diaspora. We must cash in on the burden they were alive we gotta get paid my nigga.

 

[Mohmed]

I still do stand by that statement, it's called recycling which humans can be recycled also well physically anyways. The amount of dead bodies in Somalia, the supply is plentiful, the business model is sound, U just need to legalise it so it's not done thru maqaffe or illegal actors who are even resorting to kidnapping people alive for the trade, which I do not condone that method, what I do condone is if he is already dead, U got permission from his relatives who probably will say yes when they get a fee for it, plus his organs can be used to preserve high productive people who are on long waiting list for surgeriesglobally who the world needs.

Where as that unproductive nigga was just an burden all his life in Somalia to his family, friend, community and nation. I also suggest a similar model for dead Somalis in the diaspora. We must cash in on the burden they were alive we gotta get paid my nigga.