those degenerate ideology of bombing innocents. nothing to do woth islam and normal muslims like me. if your salafi or wahabi you should get punished.
I don’t think anyone claims to be khawarijEither you ignorant or an Ashari sufi. If you did your research you would know that Salafis are the most outspoken against terrorism and suicide bombings. The reason why you connect Salafism with terrorism is due to terrorist khawarij claiming to be Salafis. If you knew the definition of Salafiyyah you would claim it too as it means following the salaf
You are right, Salafis may not be as numerous as ahlul bidah and the ignorants but they sure are consistent and deeprooted in faith, and no other groups refer back to quran, ahadith and the salaf as they do.the good news is that this kind of lame tactic shows how strong Salafiyyah is. the anti-Salafi people can't actually refute Salafiyyah so they are constantly resorting to these lame sort of arguments.
I don’t think anyone claims to be khawarij
FINALLY, someone gets it. i think the biggest harm they do to islam is they drive out the religion's intellectuals. when you tell your mathematicians, philosophers, physicists, etc that logic/philosophy is haram then they sure as hell aren't just gonna leave all that behind, turn their brains off and follow you blindly.those degenerate ideology of bombing innocents. nothing to do woth islam and normal muslims like me. if your salafi or wahabi you should get punished.
finaly someone that thinks like me. i can die happy nowFINALLY, someone gets it. i think the biggest harm they do to islam is they drive out the religion's intellectuals. when you tell your mathematicians, philosophers, physicists, etc that logic/philosophy is haram then they sure as hell aren't just gonna leave all that behind, turn their brains off and follow you blindly.
Scholars of the past loved philosophy and infact influenced it. Imam Ghazali was a famous for itFINALLY, someone gets it. i think the biggest harm they do to islam is they drive out the religion's intellectuals. when you tell your mathematicians, philosophers, physicists, etc that logic/philosophy is haram then they sure as hell aren't just gonna leave all that behind, turn their brains off and follow you blindly.
Lol you obviously never read ghazali before. Ghazali literally denounced philosophic views and considered it a cancer for the layman to read. All of his virtues and ethics closely side with the Sunnah in his revival of the religious sciencesScholars of the past loved philosophy and infact influenced it. Imam Ghazali was a famous for it
Lol you obviously never read ghazali before. Ghazali literally denounced philosophic views and considered it a cancer for the layman to read. All of his virtues and ethics closely side with the Sunnah in his revival of the religious sciences
"Either you ignorant or an Ashari sufi. If you did your research you would know that Salafis are the most outspoken against terrorism and suicide bombings. The reason why you connect Salafism with terrorism is due to terrorist khawarij claiming to be Salafis. If you knew the definition of Salafiyyah you would claim it too as it means following the salaf."FINALLY, someone gets it. i think the biggest harm they do to islam is they drive out the religion's intellectuals. when you tell your mathematicians, philosophers, physicists, etc that logic/philosophy is haram then they sure as hell aren't just gonna leave all that behind, turn their brains off and follow you blindly.
Neo-Athari/Salafi creed causes brain rot:
Send this shit back to Saudi Arabia
Scholars of the past loved philosophy and infact influenced it. Imam Ghazali was a famous for it
FINALLY, someone gets it. i think the biggest harm they do to islam is they drive out the religion's intellectuals. when you tell your mathematicians, philosophers, physicists, etc that logic/philosophy is haram then they sure as hell aren't just gonna leave all that behind, turn their brains off and follow you blindly.
no he didn't, imam ghazali recognized the uses of philosophy. but unlike the arrogant philosophers (saying stuff like "religion is a dumbed down version of philosophy") he actually realized the limitations of philosophy. so he still used a tramendous amounts of philosophy but he didn't go overboard. As for ethics, i think he was influenced a lot by Aristotle's ethics.Lol you obviously never read ghazali before. Ghazali literally denounced philosophic views and considered it a cancer for the layman to read. All of his virtues and ethics closely side with the Sunnah in his revival of the religious sciences
but imam ghazali (AUN ) was an ashari sufi. you will never ever see a salafi wahabi make as much sense as imam ghazali did. now, if you want a salafi/wahhabi then you have people like ibn-taymiyya. he isn't a salafi/wahhabi 100% but you know what i mean. the guy literally was against logic from my understanding.