Salafism is the truth

K

Köttbullar

Lum said:
Proof?
Click to expand...
"The House of Saud is the ruling royal family of Saudi Arabia. It is composed of the descendants of Muhammad bin Saud, founder of the Emirate of Diriyah, known as the First Saudi state (1744–1818), and his brothers, though the ruling faction of the family is primarily led by the descendants of Ibn Saud, the modern founder of Saudi Arabia.
The House of Saud has had three phases: the Emirate of Diriyah, the First Saudi State (1744–1818), marked by the expansion of Wahhabism."

Now you are telling me that if they have ruled by Planning with the WEST to take down Ottoman empire(the only Islamic calipathe since the prophet who didnt bend to gaalos) and now have control of the middle east.You are telling me they who have backstabbed killed and is responsible for a lot of destruction to our muslim brother in the arab world.That when they had the expansion of wahabbism didnt make it fit their narrative? there is a reason why everyone trusted ullama is from there.These ullamas have said that Osama bin laden was a mujaheed when he fought the russians(enemy of the west) but he was a terrorist when he fought Americans?They convinced their population in a matter of a decade.They have the power to do that and every one is blindly following may allah guide them.
They also didnt let osama stop Usa inasion in Irak wtf Why? Im telling you the house of Saud maybe had good intentions in the BEGINNING but not since they overthrew the ottoman empire :manny:
 
O

Omar del Sur

RETIRED
VIP
Köttbullar said:
"The House of Saud is the ruling royal family of Saudi Arabia. It is composed of the descendants of Muhammad bin Saud, founder of the Emirate of Diriyah, known as the First Saudi state (1744–1818), and his brothers, though the ruling faction of the family is primarily led by the descendants of Ibn Saud, the modern founder of Saudi Arabia.
The House of Saud has had three phases: the Emirate of Diriyah, the First Saudi State (1744–1818), marked by the expansion of Wahhabism."

Now you are telling me that if they have ruled by Planning with the WEST to take down Ottoman empire(the only Islamic calipathe since the prophet who didnt bend to gaalos) and now have control of the middle east.You are telling me they who have backstabbed killed and is responsible for a lot of destruction to our muslim brother in the arab world.That when they had the expansion of wahabbism didnt make it fit their narrative? there is a reason why everyone trusted ullama is from there.These ullamas have said that Osama bin laden was a mujaheed when he fought the russians(enemy of the west) but he was a terrorist when he fought Americans?They convinced their population in a matter of a decade.They have the power to do that and every one is blindly following may allah guide them.
They also didnt let osama stop Usa inasion in Irak wtf Why? Im telling you the house of Saud maybe had good intentions in the BEGINNING but not since they overthrew the ottoman empire :manny:
Click to expand...

you realize house of saud and salafism are not the same thing?

salafism is sort of an ideology
if a member of the saudi family does something which isn't correct, that doesn't mean the views of a theologian who lived hundreds of years ago are incorrect
 
K

Köttbullar

Omar del Sur said:
you realize house of saud and salafism are not the same thing?

salafism is sort of an ideology
if a member of the saudi family does something which isn't correct, that doesn't mean the views of a theologian who lived hundreds of years ago are incorrect
Click to expand...

Sxb dont lie over 90% of saudis are Salafis.They are the look people have of Salafis.

Lets not get complicated :yacadiim:
 
L

Lum

رَّبِّ زِدْنِي عِلْمًا
Köttbullar said:
"The House of Saud is the ruling royal family of Saudi Arabia. It is composed of the descendants of Muhammad bin Saud, founder of the Emirate of Diriyah, known as the First Saudi state (1744–1818), and his brothers, though the ruling faction of the family is primarily led by the descendants of Ibn Saud, the modern founder of Saudi Arabia.
The House of Saud has had three phases: the Emirate of Diriyah, the First Saudi State (1744–1818), marked by the expansion of Wahhabism."

Now you are telling me that if they have ruled by Planning with the WEST to take down Ottoman empire(the only Islamic calipathe since the prophet who didnt bend to gaalos) and now have control of the middle east.You are telling me they who have backstabbed killed and is responsible for a lot of destruction to our muslim brother in the arab world.That when they had the expansion of wahabbism didnt make it fit their narrative? there is a reason why everyone trusted ullama is from there.These ullamas have said that Osama bin laden was a mujaheed when he fought the russians(enemy of the west) but he was a terrorist when he fought Americans?They convinced their population in a matter of a decade.They have the power to do that and every one is blindly following may allah guide them.
They also didnt let osama stop Usa inasion in Irak wtf Why? Im telling you the house of Saud maybe had good intentions in the BEGINNING but not since they overthrew the ottoman empire :manny:
Click to expand...
Köttbullar said:
Wallahi u guys are in denial.Saxiib Real salfism ahve been changed and merged with Sauds Wahabbism anthing else is been @Lum @Omar del Sur
Click to expand...
« Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab did not rebel against the Ottoman Empire, it is a lie because the Ottoman Empire had no rule there. The closest they were was in Iraq, and they were not in the Najd where Shaykh al-Islaam Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhaab was born. As for the shaykh himself, then his father was Shaikh Abdul Wahhaab bin Sulaymaan.»
 
K

Köttbullar

Lum said:
« Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab did not rebel against the Ottoman Empire, it is a lie because the Ottoman Empire had no rule there. The closest they were was in Iraq, and they were not in the Najd where Shaykh al-Islaam Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhaab was born. As for the shaykh himself, then his father was Shaikh Abdul Wahhaab bin Sulaymaan.»
Click to expand...

WTF are u tryna change history stop this madness walaal allah does not like liars.Its a well known fact that Saudi overthrew and backstabbed ottomans cause of greed. :wow1:
 
tyrannicalmanager

tyrannicalmanager

pseudo-intellectual
except for geopolitics, why is salafism bad in a theological standpoint?
there are countless valid argument against sufiism or shiaism that are based on the quran, but i've yet to see one person making valid criticism against salafism.
 
Last edited:
ا

المهندس

tyrannicalmanager said:
except for geopolitics, why is salafism bad in a theological standpoint?
there are countless valid argument against sufiism or shiaism that are based on the quran, but i've yet to see one person making valid criticism against salafism.
Click to expand...


Its not bad salafi is the correct ideology upon sunnah but the issue is salafi itself has branches such as extreme salafi jihadi and extreme hizbiyyah salafi which lick the futo of saudi arabia. The middle path of salafi is correct but the problem is both these branches claim the middle path when they clearly have biased viewpoints and twist fatawah/fiqh rulings
 
Cyrus

Cyrus

Arabist| Akh-Right Movement|احب الملكات العرب
Köttbullar said:
Sxb im 100% sure you can not find "true" salfism that guy had hundreds of years ago.
Like i said lets not get complicated :what:
Click to expand...
Are you 68 IQ naya? If you want to critique an ideologies legitimacy, you look into its actual doctrines and go to the source instead of giving us so and so did this and that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending

Latest posts

Top