In today's world, famines are entirely man-made. More people die today from obesity (eating too much food) than die from hunger. Simply put, the world produces more food than can be consumed leading a lot of food being thrown away. Just think of how much food you discard TODAY alone!
There is no such thing "natural" famines anymore. Natural famines occurred in the old days when there was simply not enough food to eat. The last true natural famine was probably more than 100 years ago.
Most famines since then were caused by political failings. The famine of 1991-1992 in Somalia, which I lived through and survived, was caused by politicians. The famine underway right now in Somalia is also the result of the abject political failures of so-called Somali leaders. I've seen videos of countless dead goats, camels and cows. If Somalia functioned as a politically well run country, these value assets (livestock) would be sold in a functioning market and the proceeds used to purchase food from international food markets.
Neither does drought cause famine. There's been sever droughts in California and Australia for several years. People die from hunger during droughts because of poverty and because of market failure. If Somali markets functioned properly, people would've sold their animals, rather than watch them all die, and then used the proceeds to buy food until the drought resided.
So, I ask: Should Somalia ban famines? Should hold Somali politicians personally responsible for future famines? Imagine Somali politicians hauled in front of courts for crime of committing famine.
There is no such thing "natural" famines anymore. Natural famines occurred in the old days when there was simply not enough food to eat. The last true natural famine was probably more than 100 years ago.
Most famines since then were caused by political failings. The famine of 1991-1992 in Somalia, which I lived through and survived, was caused by politicians. The famine underway right now in Somalia is also the result of the abject political failures of so-called Somali leaders. I've seen videos of countless dead goats, camels and cows. If Somalia functioned as a politically well run country, these value assets (livestock) would be sold in a functioning market and the proceeds used to purchase food from international food markets.
Neither does drought cause famine. There's been sever droughts in California and Australia for several years. People die from hunger during droughts because of poverty and because of market failure. If Somali markets functioned properly, people would've sold their animals, rather than watch them all die, and then used the proceeds to buy food until the drought resided.
So, I ask: Should Somalia ban famines? Should hold Somali politicians personally responsible for future famines? Imagine Somali politicians hauled in front of courts for crime of committing famine.