Somalia's economy is fully dollarized. The shilling is no longer really used to buy items that cost anything more than $10.
Two papers helped me better understand what the implications of a fully dollarized economy may be.
This is a general overview:
Full Dollarization The Pros and Cons
This is a good case study on Ecuador, population 18 million, which has had a fully dollarized economy since 2000.
Twenty years of official dollarization in Ecuador: a blessing or a curse?
The most interesting thing I learned from this is the consensus that dollarization is permanent.
This was news to me.
Two papers helped me better understand what the implications of a fully dollarized economy may be.
This is a general overview:
Full Dollarization The Pros and Cons
This is a good case study on Ecuador, population 18 million, which has had a fully dollarized economy since 2000.
Twenty years of official dollarization in Ecuador: a blessing or a curse?
The most interesting thing I learned from this is the consensus that dollarization is permanent.
This was news to me.
The differences between currency boards and dollarization are few, but important. Dollarization's key distinguishing feature is that it is permanent, or nearly so. Reversing dollarization is much more difficult than modifying or abandoning a currency board arrangement. In fact, the largest benefits claimed from dollarization derive from the credibility it carries precisely because it is nearly irreversible. And yet for some countries under particular circumstances, the irreversibility could come at a very high cost.
In countries where monetary policy has lost credibility, the adoption of a foreign currency may offer a strong commitment device (Del Negro et al. 2001) and stabilize monetary and financial conditions. This substantial benefit in terms of monetary policy credibility is mostly related to its near irreversibility. Reversing dollarization is almost impossible and would entail tremendous costs.