The alchemist
VIP
Our camels were noted for special endurance among the rest:
A picture:
A picture:
Last edited:
You are noting facts about the fitness profile of our animals.It's kinda weird how hardy I've noticed Somali livestock are often noted to be. You'll see similar writings about our blackhead sheep, Somali ponies and horses, our goats and even the Boran type cattle we share with many Oromos like the eponymous Borana.
They'll usually be very hardy, disease-resistant animals that can go a remarkably long time without feed or water and produce remarkable results despite that in comparison to other breeds.
I say weird because you'd expect this to maybe be more true about Arabian livestock given how much harsher the Jazeera is when compared to Somaliweyn but then I suppose Arabia is too harsh so you get animals that are hardy but also won't produce as much milk, meat or overall performance because of how regularly parched they are like in the case of the Hassaswi cattle whereas in Somaliweyn you get a middle-ground where it's often not a completely barren hellish desert like much of the Jazeera but it's still harsh enough to get them remarkably hardy.
2) The camel in the Somali environmental condition, got high consistent harsh conditioning. Hence, it can sustain a sweet-spot medium, where the pressure is not entirely inhospitable for how the animal can adapt (still pushes it to the adaptive limit, guided by specialists), but overall worse than the Arabian one for a reason. You see, the Arabian condition has topological diversity. They have either complete desertic dunes (if such hyper-arid conditions had full coverage, they would not survive, i.e., worse than the Somali lands) with areas of hot-spot ecosystems, with an endemic range from the coastal west to southwest and south that show the higher richness of vegetation structure and plant richness. Because we don't have the extent to the latter, you can say there was no ease with which the camel could have become less durable while under our specialized control.
Yeah, for sure. I was talking generally in the transhumance pastoralists' regions. There are mountain ranges that I am sure have endemic ecosystems.There are, to be fair, several pockets of fertility similar to oases even in the north. My own folk are from Sanaag where you have Cal Madow along with some other green patches near and around Ceerigaabo. But one thing I've noticed, and this was historically true in the riverine south as well, whenever there are greener zones like this Somalis tend to start favoring cattle over camels or at least using cattle a whole lot more. My own mother's ayeeyo, a Raxanweyn of the Maalin Weyn used to keep a large herd of cattle in Koonfur on her father's farm and grow grapes alongside them.
Somalis seem to really focus camels on the arid zones and not be as interested in them when more green lands are encountered. Even cadaans noted that in the more fertile Koonfur you see a remarkable uptick in cattle use, similarly in the interior of the northwest and around Harar where many tribes historically practiced settled agriculture. This, as you say, deliberate specialization probably helped further shape their hardiness.
Somali livestock is more similar to Mongolian steppe livestock in stature and hardiness.It's kinda weird how hardy I've noticed Somali livestock are often noted to be. You'll see similar writings about our blackhead sheep, Somali ponies and horses, our goats and even the Boran type cattle we share with many Oromos like the eponymous Borana.
They'll usually be very hardy, disease-resistant animals that can go a remarkably long time without feed or water and produce remarkable results despite that in comparison to other breeds.
I say weird because you'd expect this to maybe be more true about Arabian livestock given how much harsher the Jazeera is when compared to Somaliweyn but then I suppose Arabia is too harsh so you get animals that are hardy but also won't produce as much milk, meat or overall performance because of how regularly parched they are like in the case of the Hassaswi cattle whereas in Somaliweyn you get a middle-ground where it's often not a completely barren hellish desert like much of the Jazeera but it's still harsh enough to get them remarkably hardy.
Those Mongolian animals couldn't survive in the Somali environment and vice versa. If Somali animals were minimal cold-adapted, then Somali domesticates are way superior than if the Mongolian herds had minimal desert resistance.Somali livestock is more similar to Mongolian steppe livestock in stature and hardiness.
What's the difference between Pony and Horse?You're right about the size; technically Somali horses are not ponies. They're just smaller horses that adapted to the semi-arid desert environment. The diminutive stature, called ecological dwarfism, can help with energy efficiency. The body requires less food, less water, and better in an environment with lower of such resources.
A pony is a horse with a low height with specific distinct characteristics to behavior and phenotype. But a Somali horse is not a pony, just a smaller version of what it was due to environmental adaptation from pressuring conditions.What's the difference between Pony and Horse?
I don’t mean that Mongolian animals can survive in our environment or vice versa, but that they subsist of water and pasture only. Just like our horses, they’re known for stamina, self sufficiency and ability to forage.Those Mongolian animals couldn't survive in the Somali environment and vice versa. If Somali animals were minimal cold-adapted, then Somali domesticates are way superior than if the Mongolian herds had minimal desert resistance.
You're right about the size; technically Somali horses are not ponies. They're just smaller horses that adapted to the semi-arid desert environment. The diminutive stature, called ecological dwarfism, can help with energy efficiency. The body requires less food, less water, and better in an environment with lower of such resources.
I can see a reason or two why maybe farming-leaning agro-pastoralists prefer cattle with their sedentary subsistence strategy. I think you get more bang for the buck. The cattle can help out and it is fatter as well while only eating 1/3 more food than the camel. Less to handle and produces 5 times as much milk. As you move with the camel herd, those animals eat whatever they have available, doesn't matter, leaves, twigs, those annoying shrubs, everything. But if you had those on a farm, they would eat it all. I think to sustain a camel population, you are compelled to move seasonally (to natural cyclical ecosystems), otherwise, you're in trouble with them eating your ground up, producing way less milk per animal, etc.