It doesn't, it's something made up online recently, Muhyiddin is a noble Hatimi Barawani Banadiri don't slander himUh, yeah it does lmao
It doesn't, it's something made up online recently, Muhyiddin is a noble Hatimi Barawani Banadiri don't slander himUh, yeah it does lmao
I was correcting his misinformationWhatโs with the passive aggressive attitude @Bazed was defending your people![]()
Because he's from an Arab tribehe looks extremely arab
Yeah that's what I mean bro.Somalia is diverse culturally and linguistically, Banadiris themselves are diverse culturally, he speaks Chimini not Maxatiri language, your cultural food is cad iyo caano, Him being from somewhere in Somalia is enough to make him Somali
I'm catching strays. Reading comprehension is at a all time low in our day and age.Whatโs with the passive aggressive attitude @Bazed was defending your people![]()
There is literally no difference between that and Somali nationality unless you think the minorities who live in Somalia aren't allowed to call themselves citizens of Somalia.while the nationality is Kazakhstani
Not to the same extent as mixed populations like Kazakhs who can take the appearance of two different races.Every ethnic group have some degree of diverse physical appearances
As slaves, yes. They simply aren't Somali because they didn't contribute meaningfully to Somalia, they have no real history involving us. Benadiris are the opposite.who have lived in Somalia for centuries too
There is literally no difference between that and Somali nationality unless you think the minorities who live in Somalia aren't allowed to call themselves citizens of Somalia.
As slaves, yes. They simply aren't Somali because they didn't contribute meaningfully to Somalia, they have no real history involving us. Benadiris are the opposite.
I mean they contributed...With all due respect, please read my posts before responding. For the third time, my point was that in some countries, there's only one label to define both ethnicity and nationality such as Somalia, while there're two distinct in others such as Kazakhstan.
I didn't say anything about what minorities should and should not call themselves. As I said above, 'the Somali identity has a broader definition compared to Kazakhs', i.e. of course, minorities, or anyone in Somalia, will call themselves Somalis, which also means being a citizens of the Somali nation.
Here you go again. Educate yourself before speaking on what you don't know.
Madowweyne are as much Somali as Banaadiris are. In fact, if we're going to be correct here, quite a few of Banaadiris don't view themselves as ethnic Somalis, but rather a distinct group living in Somalia, such the Banaadiri poster in this thread. In any case, you had the audacity to even call other out for being exclusionist and 'racialist', you're one funny lad
Fact is, some Jreer clans already lived in present day Somalia prior to slavery. Many of the Bantus brought here through slavery have also been incorporated into mainstream clans and Somali society.
Also what do you mean, they didn't contribute meaningfully to Somalia? First of all, Somalia didn't even exist prior to 1960. Secondly, ethnicity is not determined by how much you contribute to a country. It's embarrassing for me to even have to say this as it reveals how little you know about the definition of ethnicity or the history of the people of Somalia. I don't think it's worth continuing.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I mean they contributed...
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
What are you basing this off of? Why does Kazakhstan have two seperate identities but Somalia doesn't?while there're two distinct identities in others such as Kazakhstan.
Those are far and few between. Its like Sardinians considering themselves completely seperate from Italians, its a minority opinion.quite a few of Banaadiris don't view themselves as ethnic Somalis,
Only few select clans have done this like abgaal. Bantus are by no means incorporated into the clan system and are pretty much still seen as foreigners.have also been incorporated into mainstream clans and Somali society.
I mean Somali civilizations. Somalia obviously didn't exist before 1960 but the various city states, sultanates, and tribes did and Bantus weren't apart of those at all.they didn't contribute meaningfully to Somalia?
Walaal, this is the kind of thinking white liberals have on ethnicity. A group shouldn't be apart of the majority just because they live there, it just cheapens and devalues the meaning of ethnicity if anyone can join. For example, Somalis in the UK, Sweden, Denmark ect aren't true Europeans just because they are citizens. We aren't like the Oromo who will accept anyone in their ranks. Somali identity should mean something and isn't some label that can be thrown at anyone.ethnicity is not determined by how much you contribute to a country. It's embarrassing for me to even have to say this as it
What are you basing this off of? Why does Kazakhstan have two seperate identities but Somalia doesn't?
Those are far and few between. Its like Sardinians considering themselves completely seperate from Italians, its a minority opinion.
Only few select clans have done this like abgaal. Bantus are by no means incorporated into the clan system and are pretty much still seen as foreigners.
I mean Somali civilizations. Somalia obviously didn't exist before 1960 but the various city states, sultanates, and tribes did and Bantus weren't apart of those at all.
Walaal, this is the kind of thinking white liberals have on ethnicity. A group shouldn't be apart of the majority just because they live there, it just cheapens and devalues the meaning of ethnicity if anyone can join. For example, Somalis in the UK, Sweden, Denmark ect aren't true Europeans just because they are citizens. We aren't like the Oromo who will accept anymore in their ranks. Somali ethnicity should mean something and isn't some label that can be thrown at anyone.
So semantics? Functionally speaking, Kazakhstani and Somali nationality mean the same thing.Two different demonyms.
They haven't. They have their own clans but for the most part, they aren't apart of the big five clans. I mean, how many Somali Bantu PMs exist? Do they have any sort of political power?Are you not aware that Bantus have been incorporated into the 'clan system'?
Then they don't fit that definition either. Somali Bantus have very little Somali DNA and as mentioned above hardly marry Somalis either. Their lineage can be traced back to Tanzania.it has basis on some form of common genetic ancestry along other factors.
At the very least, Benadiris have a much stronger claim to being Somali than Bantus do.You can't pick as it suit you. It simply doesn't make sense to me at all.
So semantics? Functionally speaking, Kazakhstani and Somali nationality mean the same thing.
They haven't. They have their own clans but for the most part, they aren't apart of the big five clans. I mean, how many Somali Bantu PMs exist? Do they have any sort of political power?
View attachment 301300
Then they don't fit that definition either. Somali Bantus have very little Somali DNA and as mentioned above hardly marry Somalis either. Their lineage can be traced back to Tanzania.
At the very least, Benadiris have a much stronger claim to being Somali than Bantus do.
I never denied that there were some Somali Bantus among the clans or that some have incorporated them (I previously listed the Abgaal for a reason) but its fact that most Bantus aren't apart of the main clans.Are you now denying facts?
Who are the majority of the Somali Bantu. The Bantu clans that assimilated among Somalis are obviously few are far between because our DNA is still pure. Again, we aren't like the Oromo who have assimilated numerous non-Oromo people which is reflected on their DNA.such as Gosha Bantus.
I don't mind them as citizens but at the end of the day, Bantus aren't ethnic Somalis. They are by far the most alien part of Somalia, even more so than the Arabs.both of them are part of both Somali nation and thus Somalis
The former slaves are minority amongst jร reers in generalThere is literally no difference between that and Somali nationality unless you think the minorities who live in Somalia aren't allowed to call themselves citizens of Somalia.
Not to the same extent as mixed populations like Kazakhs who can take the appearance of two different races.
As slaves, yes. They simply aren't Somali because they didn't contribute meaningfully to Somalia, they have no real history involving us. Benadiris are the opposite.
Which clan does MJ's fits into?These people are trying to degrade the Somali ethnicity. Yes we accept that there are other people part of the Somali nation. But the Somali ethnicity is a Cushitic tribe made of 5 clan families. Dir, Darood, isaaq, Hawiye, RX. There's no need to speak further.
DirWhich clan does MJ's fits into?