Oromo, Afar, Beja, Sidamo, Mongols, Turks, Persians, Kurds, Pashtuns, Tajiks, Assryains, Dinka, Nuer, Massai, Koreans, and the Japanese (to some extent through the Zaibastu system).
Japanese only families that related to the royal family have clans and rest of Japanese are without clan. Less that 0.001 of Japan population have clans and the rest were peasants like farmers.Oromo, Afar, Beja, Sidamo, Mongols, Turks, Persians, Kurds, Pashtuns, Tajiks, Assryains, Dinka, Nuer, Massai, Koreans, and the Japanese (to some extent through the Zaibastu system).
Yeah you’re spitting. Japan is like if Somalia was majority madhiban they’re a outlier in clan societiesJapanese only families that related to the royal family have clans and rest of Japanese are without clan. Less that 0.001 of Japan population have clans and the rest were peasants like farmers.
The same as European nobility, Korea was the same, warrior spirit of any clan in Somalia wouldn't allow such a thing to occur to them.Yeah you’re spitting. Japan is like if Somalia was majority madhiban they’re a outlier in clan societies
The state being nobles in medieval Europe, even in the modern era, you'll have the same families running for the same offices, just look at America.Pretty much every ethnic group that has ascended past being hunter-gatherers. Obviously as you develop, the significance of clans wanes as you put more trust in the state and then eventually they disappear
Pretty much every ethnic group that has ascended past being hunter-gatherers. Obviously as you develop, the significance of clans wanes as you put more trust in the state and then eventually they disappear
Clans are still pretty significant in some of the most developed countries in the real like South Korea. The Sunheung An have held many positions in society from the political scene to the entertainment scene with idol group members & actors despite only numbering around 400k.Pretty much every ethnic group that has ascended past being hunter-gatherers. Obviously as you develop, the significance of clans wanes as you put more trust in the state and then eventually they disappear
It’s just horrible losing your clan identityPretty much every ethnic group that has ascended past being hunter-gatherers. Obviously as you develop, the significance of clans wanes as you put more trust in the state and then eventually they disappear
I think Afwerki probably does have a successor but civil war seems unlikely to be frank. The way that the state is set up means that the military has a monopoly on power and it’s a pretty cosmopolitan and nationalist institution.Siad Barre made the previous ultranationalist Somalis disillusioned with the state, the government and the Armed Forces in a geopolitical setting were dropping the ball would result in your enemies kicking the same ball out of the stadium. Afwerki really needs to initiate plans for a proper successor in Eritrea to prevent a power vacuum upon his death.
Countries like Eritrea, North Korea and Iran can’t afford even a single year of civil-war, as that situation would be exploited to the point that it would no longer resemble a civil-war but a hi-jacked internationally fuelled conflict like Somalia, Syria, Libya, etc.
Yeah it’s important to love and cherish your history, but also important to not let it get in the way of maintaining a functional state. It’s a balancing act at the end of the dayIt’s just horrible losing your clan identityView attachment 313378
Do Tigre or taigriny have clans system?Yeah it’s important to love and cherish your history, but also important to not let it get in the way of maintaining a functional state. It’s a balancing act at the end of the day
Tigre have clans (Habab, Bet Asghede, Bet Maryam, Mensaah, Semhar etc).Do Tigre or taigriny have clans system?
Everyone had clans at one point. Europe was dominated by clans, even in Rome. It was the Catholic church which was a central authority that destroyed the clans in Europe which led to things like rise of capitalism as people didn't just work with their clans but anyone. Business wasn't based on familial ties.
The Madhibaan & Japan’s clanless peasantry & Merchant classes are not synonymous. One group is considered almost “untouchable” & others are just regular folks who have no aristocratic ties.Yeah you’re spitting. Japan is like if Somalia was majority madhiban they’re a outlier in clan societies