Why doesn't anyone hold Saudi Arabia accountable for terrorist funding?

Status
Not open for further replies.

BebsiBolice

Suicidal men adore me.
Many have speculated for a while now and wiki leaks proves it. So why doesn't countries that have been targeted with terrorism hold KSA accountable?
 

Hubble

VIP
The Saudis had their toes in both waters. One hand they funded the Israelis and on the other hand they secretly funded and propagated terrorism which would threaten Israel. The goal was to have a win win scenario and that's what they've got. There's no terrorist groups in Saudi Arabia but if the terrorists were to win, no harm would come to them only minority Shia who they hate any way and they made tagfiir on them. Now it's been 'leaked' that they funded Netanyahu only after they saw that ISIS and Al Qaeda were failing the Global Caliphate project. The end is that Saudi stays rich and remains an ally to the West while the brainwashed Muslims around the world will forever associate them with the two holy mosques i.e will forever pretend they didn't see or hear anything. The Catholics have had scandal after scandal in the Vatican but their reach continues to grow, it's the same thing.

Saudis and other Gulf countries got rid of Assad by funding the rebels, they wanted a Sunni stooge. They funded extremists in Libya because Ghadafi was an African and he humiliated the Arabs in his speeches. They destabilized Somalia because they are threatened by Suufis, Somali liberals and non khaarij being so close to their countries. They wanted us to live suffocated near them and not develop, just give us aid and 'not sell our oil etc to kufaar' because they wanted to undercut them and only extremists are dumb enough to fall into that trap.
 
Last edited:

angrycat

not so sad after all
Because KSA is just a pawn in the larger picture, if a world power like the US didnt want them do do anything, then they wouldn't, but the U.N. has been a backbone to instability in many muslim countries, conspiracy theorist sound crazy, but if you actually connect the dots it makes sense.

Take somalia for example, when the ICU first emerged, somalia was becoming a bit more stable after a long while, and everyone thought it was improving-but the UN declared it a "terrorist state" and had it completly disinegrated within years with the help of Ethiopia. But although it has much less support from people, why is AS impossible for them to permanently get rid of?
 
One factor is the amount of petro-dollars Saudi Arabia has. Get on their wrong side and they could dump those dollars depreciating the value of the USD drastically. This would be enough to send the US economy into free-fall.
 
Because KSA is just a pawn in the larger picture, if a world power like the US didnt want them do do anything, then they wouldn't, but the U.N. has been a backbone to instability in many muslim countries, conspiracy theorist sound crazy, but if you actually connect the dots it makes sense.

Take somalia for example, when the ICU first emerged, somalia was becoming a bit more stable after a long while, and everyone thought it was improving-but the UN declared it a "terrorist state" and had it completly disinegrated within years with the help of Ethiopia. But although it has much less support from people, why is AS impossible for them to permanently get rid of?

They are evil those Saudis
 
One factor is the amount of petro-dollars Saudi Arabia has. Get on their wrong side and they could dump those dollars depreciating the value of the USD drastically. This would be enough to send the US economy into free-fall.

definitely has everything to do with the oil
 
no doubt they (the monarcy not the people) will join the army of dajjal when he arrives. Along with the rest of the muslim country leaders smh



Sorry to burst your bubble but there won't be a short one eyed man that pops out of Isfahan that will masquerade as the Messiah.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top