Interesting stuff bro. Aside from America and the Uk, the rest of europe can't be counted on.The best fighters in Europe are the Germans and they have been stripped and force to a symbolic miliatry, truly useless. The french, despite its good army and technology, were never fighters. If Russia, Iran and turkey are on one side, and the U.S, Israel and Europe are on the other side, where would china go? I'd back the former group.@Warsheekh
I look at this purely from a prophetic stance, the bible prophecies the destruction of America multiple times, Islamic eschatology tells us we will make an alliance with "Al-RUM" (most likely orthodox Christians) against a third enemy (whose faith is not mentioned) this points to the secular west and the Anglo/Germanic American alliance (NATO)
They will be defeated and Constantinople (Istanbul) will be reconquered, this is the biggest source of contention whom they will be reconquered from which alludes to one of the blocks taking it in the first phase of the great war (could be the secular/Judea Christian block of NATO/America/Zionists, or Orthodox Christian Eastern Europe of Russia).
The war in the hadith is described that it will be so fierce that 'birds will fall from the sky' (alludes to nuclear strikes, mushroom clouds etc). Much of humanity will perish particularly those around the west/Atlantic.
From what I read I believe Constantinople will be taken by the Orthodox Russian block after the other is eliminated in our alliance against them, because they always fantasise about it and Crimea literally overlooks Istanbul across the black sea, this will likely be the second phase after which Dajjal will make his appearance once the Muslims reconquer it as per hadith (described by the Prophet as the best of armies)
Turkey currently has an alliance with Russia and so does Iran against the Anglo/Germanic/Zionist NATO block, so it's already shaping up very nicely just as the hadith mentioned regarding the alliance. And Allah knows best.
Why are you all welcoming this? Is it because you think we can catch up to the world or something?
I know the reason why France got steam rolled in world war 2 was because they weren't expecting another war France has always had a strong land army@Adolf-Hitler
"Aside from America and the Uk, the rest of europe can't be counted on."
No way that's even remotely true - I'm assuming you're basing this on NATO contributions?
"The best fighters in Europe are the Germans and they have been stripped and force to a symbolic miliatry, truly useless."
It may be true that their military potential has been restricted since WWII, but their capability of re-arming on short notice and otherwise contributing in an all out war is significant. Logistics, finance, short lead time production/manufacturing, resources, etc. are all key arteries in war, and giants like Germany would be crucial to NATO.
"The french, despite its good army and technology, were never fighters."
Another myth, fed by their heavy losses during the 20th century wars and their (perceived) soft culture. People forget that Europe was under French domination at the tail end of the 18th century during Napoleon's campaigns. France would definitely be another giant in the war.
Then we have the Empire itself, with the most formidable war capabilities in recorded history in terms of sheer size and reach. These fuckers have enough ammunition to flatten a huge portion of the world even if you exclude nuclear.
I'm by no means promoting the bakhti Europeans - I'm just being realistic with my estimations. NATO is truly a formidable opponent. I would argue nothing besides divine intervention, internal turmoil (US civil war), or a natural disaster would truly subdue them.
This war would be the most devastating event in millennia, no one should be gleeful; most of us wouldn't probably survive it.