Oh f*ck off.
That was not freedom of speech.
It's not freedom of speech.He didn't touch her.
He just said words out of his mouth.
Freedom of speech
It's not freedom of speech.
I know you would have been singing a different tune if it was the other way around. You self hating bastid.
That was the same as assaulting her, what man talks to a woman like that? Coward! And another self hating, insecure coward is defending that act on the Internet.
You're still a self hating, insecure Uncle Tom. How dare you defend this bullshit. Screw you and your freedom of speech.An assault is physically hurting someone.
He just hurt her with words but that's freedom of speech
Freedom of speech
Learn the difference between hate speech and freedom of speech. Its not your right to call for violence towards people. But its your right to poke fun at them and watch them cry.
I think the neighbourhood/5 tuulo clan autonomous state advocates, the separatists and the NFD/K5 Xabashi/Kikuyu bootyclappers should take a seat. Or even better, executed. They should be executed alongside the Arab bootyclappers like @Kaafiye who wants us to be ruled by Arab sheikhs in Riyadh/Mecca in a mega Salafi state.
This wasn't hate speech
Saying things like "All Muslims should be wiped out" or "All disabled people should be given the needle" or "All Jews need to be in the oven" or "The Tutsi should be eliminated" is hate speech.
"The hijab is like a gorilla mask" is not hate speech. It is freedom of speech.
Learn the difference between hate speech and freedom of speech. Its not your right to call for violence towards people. But its your right to poke fun at them and watch them cry.
Da holohoax never happened gets you jail time in Europe but its open season on Muslims
Freedom of speech*
Explain then why many people have been convicted of holocaust denial in the "enlightened" west, such as Jim Keegstra in Canada under "hate speech" laws. Clearly the courts do not define "hate speech" in the rigid way that you do, and there's a clear legal precedent for this. As long as a country or society decides that certain speech will not be tolerated, there will be a great deal flexibility on when the line has been crossed.
Oh, and when you call for the genocide of people with different political beliefs than you, like you did here:
Would you not agree this type of hate speech, by your own definition, is in violation of Canadian law?
As I said before, AbdiEey, you're a hypocrite of the worst kind.
Typical Muslim SJW style victim mentality. Someone calls you nasty names, you know what you do? Build a bridge and get the f*ck over it instead of whining like a child.
Had this been a madow crying racism the usual suspects would be in here lambasting the African American victimhood mentality. But no, it's Muslims so that's different.
He didn't touch her.
He just said words out of his mouth.
Freedom of speech