Garaad diinle
What is the 1760 description ur talking about
What is the 1760 description ur talking about
Yeah you're right costal cities had what people might call low class and some of them were most likely hunters. That being said the fact that noble somalis don't use bows might not have been an absolute rule.Might the sea food and bow & arrows show that Mogadishu have always carried a substantial lowercast population? Bc that's two things "noble" clans wouldn't do.
The loose garment might be the Qamiis and/or wrapped garment that the Imam of Abgaal wore when Guillain visited him, which was popular all over the South. The Qamiis was certainly woren by Camuudis and Ashraaf, but possibly by more cadcads.
It's not most likely referring to Ajuraan, that's just a conjecture of Cerulli. We don't know if Ajuraan would have seen themselves as Hawiye then nor if they even lived there, considering they're originally from Shabelle. We have to investigate *ALL* Hawiye lineages to find a much more suitable answerThe founders of mogadisho marka and gobweyn are not known but speculated. while we know the inhabitants were somalis, the oral stories we have regarding their foundation varies from each other and in many cases completely disagree. Although the oldest mention of marka has it's inhabitants called hawiya most likely refering to ajuran here.
Tunni founded barawa and am pretty sure they are rahanweyneWe don't know who foundwd Marka, only that it's earliest mention was with Hawiye. Also Reewing don't live nor have a history in Baraawe, where did u get them from?
No they didn't and no they aren't.Tunni founded barawa and am pretty sure they are rahanweyne
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BarawaNo they didn't and no they aren't.
You're right in the sense that it could be any hawiya clan though occam's razor is our bestIt's not most likely referring to Ajuraan, that's just a conjecture of Cerulli. We don't know if Ajuraan would have seen themselves as Hawiye then nor if they even lived there, considering they're originally from Shabelle. We have to investigate *ALL* Hawiye lineages to find a much more suitable answer
The oral stories talks ab sultanate years, way after 1154. Also, we're not talking ab 19th century, the britsh are irrelevant. Ajuraan are far from the best suggestionYou're right in the sense that it could be any hawiya clan though occam's razor is our best
option for the time being. Ajuraan today consider themselves as hawiya or bah hawiya. The
british called the ajuraan in kenya hawiya and oral stories from marka also points towards
ajuraan presence in the coast including marka. The biiamaal has ajuraan in there oral story.
Nigga there are references in wiki , use themWiki
Much have changed in the last hundred years or so, any information is relevante to our story.The oral stories talks ab sultanate years, way after 1154. Also, we're not talking ab 19th century, the britsh are irrelevant. Ajuraan are far from the best suggestion
I'm saying Ajuraan being them is from a faulty construction of our past by Cerulli. No need for another suggestion now, beter to survey the clans in LS and find clues their. Also, the britsh were dependent on info from all colonial travelers, so them being called Hawiye in NFD isn't reflective of what they saw themselves as.Much have changed in the last hundred years or so, any information is relevante to our story.
The fact that the british recorded the ajuraan living all the way in kenya as hawiya is evidans that ajuraan being hawiya is not a recent thing.
Ajuraan always saw themselves as hawiya to say otherwise requires evidence do you have any? There are even some oral stories of how odayga abgaal was bah ajuraan. In reagard to the oral stories referring to a sultanate did you know that the account of 1154 is about a powefull muslim hawiya people sound like it could very easily be interpreted as a sultanate.
When you say ajuraan is not our best option who do you suggest right now? Is your suggestions supported by oral stories.
Wait r u saying that ajuraan ain't hawiyeI'm saying Ajuraan being them is from a faulty construction of our past by Cerulli. No need for another suggestion now, beter to survey the clans in LS and find clues their. Also, the britsh were dependent on info from all colonial travelers, so them being called Hawiye in NFD isn't reflective of what they saw themselves as.
Yes, only their Reer AbtisWait r u saying that ajuraan ain't hawiye
What do u mean by only their reer abtisYes, only their Reer Abtis
Man are you pulling my leg now the ajuraan today doesn't refute the british account or disputes it. Everyone know that they are either considerd hawiya or bah hawiya.I'm saying Ajuraan being them is from a faulty construction of our past by Cerulli. No need for another suggestion now, beter to survey the clans in LS and find clues their. Also, the britsh were dependent on info from all colonial travelers, so them being called Hawiye in NFD isn't reflective of what they saw themselves as.
Ajuraan's grandmother was HawiyeWhat do u mean by only their reer abtis
Also Ibn Battuta
وصف ملابسهم مشابه إلى حد ما لنص إعلان 1760 الذي وجدته. مبهر.