E-M78 is Egyptian, its presence in the Maghreb is just proof of recent Egyptian ancestry, which would probably explain some of the cultural similiarties shared between paleolithic egypt/sudan and the maghreb, some of which, are older in egypt, indicating migration from there, and why they show some craniofacial similarities to people from north east africa, if E-M78 is Maghrebi than why does Taforalt make up so little of North East African peoples ancestry? The maghreb is not a major source of ancestry for East Africans, it probably isn't even a minor one.E-M78 is not Egyptian and that map is outdated and wrong.
E-M78 is from the Maghreb. This finding is set in stone due to finding ancient genomes literally a generation or two removed from when the E-M78 mutation occured.
Who cares if i use E3b its not that deep lol, you haven't said anything convincing that proves what I said wrong.Judging by your previous usage of E3b and now this oudated map, it looks like your knowledge of anthropology is 20 years stuck in the past.
When did I say Hadza had E natively or whatever? Please quote me.The Hadza do not even have haplogroup E natively. Their original lineage is haplogroup B. You will not find any haplogroup E in ancient genomes from pre-Cushitic HGs of Tanzania. All the E they have is either recently from Cushites (mainly E-M293 -people like the Datooga nearby) or Bantus (mainly E-M2).
I said, E-M215/E-M35 originated in the Horn of Africa, but that population would have ultimately come from North Africa and carried a Eurasian-like autosomal ancestry.
They would have absorbed some Mota/Hadza related ancestry and moved North into Egypt again, we know for a fact that Natufians were part Egyptian which would explain the presence of Mota-like ancestry
They are modelled as part Hadza, Daniel Shriner was able to model them as 7% Omotic.Lastly, the Taforalt do not have Omotic ancestry proper. Their SSA-like ancestry is called Ancestral North African and isn't related to East Africans for literally tens of thousands of years. Even in K= autosomal studies, it quickly dissipates the moment the K is cranked up just slightly higher.
Hadza people can be modelled as 86% Omotic.
Hadza, Mota and Omotic all share a common ancestor that had a presence in Paleolithic Ethiopia.
There ancestry is found in the Natufians, a partly Egyptian people, attesting to the presence of Mota/Hadza related ancestry in Paleolithic Egypt.
I never said they were basal to North Africans, idk where you got this from. I explicitly said:As for Omotic people, they are not ancestral/basal to North African Afro-Asiatic people. The only undisputed Omotic lineage is E1b1a2 (E-M329) and that one is not related to other AA lineages for 40,000 years and is not relevant to the Afro-Asiatic language family whatsoever.
I predict proto-Afro asiatic speakers would be predominantly Natufian/Taforalt related and/or rich in Basal Eurasian with some Mota/Hadza related ancestry and maybe some Dinka.