. Why don't you buy this strong telescope and tell me what you see that proves this theory of yours that isn't just confirmation bias 
. Science can be confirmed correct my point was who confirms it not whether or not it's being confirmed.It's text book atheist responses. Don't take it to heart. Like I said they have canned responses. When they insult is when they get agitated because their words have no substance. He can't prove what you asked him to so he tried to turn it around with the old atheist favorite "burden of proof is on the claimant" not realizing in this case he's the claimant
. Does he or does he not have evidence is what I'm askingStrong telescope kulaha
Strong telescope kulaha
Is she annoying you. cousinSo an observation is now confirmation bias?
The universe is expanding, galaxies are moving away from us. Meaning at some point the universe must have started expanding. I'm really simplifying it here but is there anything illogical with this theory? That's up for you to decide. I choose to trust the track record of the scientific community simply because of all the other things they've been right about. Islam doesn't have a track record, it's completely based on faith. So comparing the two is a false equivalence.
So an observation is now confirmation bias?
The universe is expanding, galaxies are moving away from us. Meaning at some point the universe must have started expanding. I'm really simplifying it here but is there anything illogical with this theory? That's up for you to decide. I choose to trust the track record of the scientific community simply because of all the other things they've been right about. Islam doesn't have a track record, it's completely based on faith. So comparing the two is a false equivalence.
Honey we can all confirm that with our fingers
It doesn't matter who confirmed it as long as its a fact. Its like saying who confirmed 4 + 4 = 8
can you just accept there are some things you can not confirm for yourself, unless you have special authority to do so otherwise you need to rely on second hand information, hmmm?
Honey we can all confirm that with our fingers
There we go, finally. that's all I was asking. And I choose to be skeptical because of things that cause me to be distrustful of them. But you do realize the early Muslims believed their messengers because they were always known as truthful people before, too right? So that was basically my point, we all have people whom we choose to followSo an observation is now confirmation bias?
The universe is expanding, galaxies are moving away from us. Meaning at some point the universe must have started expanding. I'm really simplifying it here but is there anything illogical with this theory? That's up for you to decide. I choose to trust the track record of the scientific community simply because of all the other things they've been right about. Islam doesn't have a track record, it's completely based on faith. So comparing the two is a false equivalence.
I'm skeptical of those I believe have an agenda. I also trust scientists but to a degree. I'm against the worship of them in atheist communities.
The like to make fun of creationists for blind following as if they're not blindly following someone else. I mean you have to, unless you're out there in the sea or excavating the ground for bones you have to trust the authority of someone else. For all we know much of what we are told could be an elaborate hoax especially that which is unverifiable. Which brings me to my main point: many atheists I've noticed are the first to believe convoluted theories that can not be confirmed. Jinns= fairy tales but aliens, why not. Many atheists will swallow the words of the wheelchair guy like soup and later claim they think for themselves despite his idiotic theories like time travel. Their entire existence in to be contrarian to the concept of God/religion. They come up with their own version of religion while saying they follow none. Many scoff at the idea of a single God while happily accepting a universe created by many creators such as aliens. (No kidding an atheist guy was actually arguing this)
2.) every time religion is mentioned all atheists suddenly have a Ph.D. In physics chem, bio, bible and quranic studies.
3.) canned responses "we only follow evidence, if new evidence comes through we will gladly follow it" translation if we are told to believe something new we will believe it. Again what choice do they have? It isn't like they have the tools to discover the world, or universe alone.
theres a diffrence between theory and a FACT. learn it
