Dominicans

Apollo

VIP
We share it with Nilo-Saharans and Omotic populations who you no doubtingly refer to as Madow

Somalis don't have anything to do with any modern Nilote or Omotic group. Ancestries diverged thousands of years ago and never overlapped ever since. Literally clean splits.

PS. Likewise for the MENA shit, Somalis are nothing like them. I don't get why you guys like to identify with ancient shit. Cushites are the only really relevant group to Somalis.
 

Nilotufian

East African pastoralist. Cushite. Samaale.
VIP
Somalis don't have anything to do with any modern Nilote or Omotic group. Ancestries diverged thousands of years ago and never overlapped ever since. Literally clean splits.

Yes but still SSA African is my point.
 
Dominicans literally looked mixed though.

curly hair light skin and all.

Somalis may have "cushitic" features but all still darkskin.

If you are darkskin and come from africa, you are black
 
Somalis don't have anything to do with any modern Nilote or Omotic group. Ancestries diverged thousands of years ago and never overlapped ever since. Literally clean splits.

PS. Likewise for the MENA shit, Somalis are nothing like them. I don't get why you guys like to identify with ancient shit. Cushites are the only really relevant group to Somalis.

Somalis need to stop attaching to other phenotypes but rather make the cushitic phenotype more known.

Cushites are unlike any one in Africa, there's nowhere they fit in. They are a distinct groups
 
Dominicans are black just like how biracial AA Madows are considered black in America.

The only reason people consider bi-raicla/mixed people black is because african dna is a dominant trait. People who are mixed will end up looking more black than white 90% of the time.

Are they actually only "black"? No.
 

Juke

VIP
The only reason people consider bi-raicla/mixed people black is because african dna is a dominant trait. People who are mixed will end up looking more black than white 90% of the time.

Are they actually only "black"? No.
It's because the slave owners didn't want their garac sons to claim them or marry into their gene pool (white daughters).
 
There should be an afroasiatic identity. We have cultural, religious, genetic ties. That includes the hausa.

Distribution-Afro-Asiatic-languages.jpg

The Hausa are of Nilo-Saharan origin if I’m not mistaken.

@Apollo laid down the theory about their paternal side (R-V88) appropriating an Afro-Asiatic language before settling down in Lake Chad area mixing with local Nilotic groups.

Unlike other Afro-Asiatic speakers, the Hausa and other Chadic groups carry trace amounts of the original ‘Pan Afro-Asiatic’ genome shared by native speakers.
 

JohnCena

PROFESSIONAL SHITPOSTER
Every group with some African DNA no matter how marginal that live in the US takes advantage of the AA socio-cultural and economic sphere, even more efficiently than the AAs themselves, but are quick to distance themselves disrespectfully when shit hits the fan.
100%. Nigerians exploit it to the max.
 

Juke

VIP
Aren't they under the Hispanic ethnicity in America though?
Hispanic isn't an ethnicity, more like a cultural/region of origin. The US census asks if you're hispanic or non-hispanic along with being white or black. It would be more accurate if they asked mullato (white and black mix), mestizo (white and amerindian mix), biracial, etc. but they don't want to for some reason.
 
Top