EGYPTIAN MAGAZINE INTERVIEWS SIAD BARRE

techsamatar

I put Books to the Test of Life
[ROSE AL-YUSUF Editor Muhammad Awdah's interview with Somali President, Mohammed Siad Barre]

Question: But our spiritual, cultural and national heritage is an Islamic heritage. Does that not conflict with the choice of Marxism?

Answer: The Somalis are Muslim Arabs. They fully understand the meaning of Arabism as a nationality, and Islam as a religion which came to establish justice and equality among the people. Our history is a history of struggle for the sake of our personality, nationalism and religion. The Somali people are a Muslim people fully believing in Islam. On several occasions, the entire Somali people rose to defend Islam and to repulse all the threats and invasions directed against the religion and the homeland.

Socialism, of course, is not a divine mission like Islam. It is purely a system to regulate relations between people, and to use the means of Production for the good of everyone. Therefore, there can be no contradiction between our effort to regulate our resources and national production on the one hand and Islam on the other.

God created man and gave him the blessing of the mind to distinguish between good and evil, virtue and vice. We have chosen Scientific Socialism because it is the best means to liberate the Somali Muslim, and to provide him with the ingredients of a dignified, honourable life so that he can eat, work, become educated, know the regulations of his religion and perform his religious rites. Nevertheless, a group of reactionaries attempted. to create a gap between Socialism and Islam, because Socialism is not in harmony with their ambitions and interests. Therefore, they wanted to ban it and disguise their greed and exploitation in a robe of holiness. They went out of their way to twist God 's words and to distort the essence of religion.

Question:
Was this the point when the campaign in the name of religion began?

Answer: Yes. The exploitation of religion has now become Imperialism's first, last and most important weapon. Reactionaries and imperialists have now become the protectors and guards of religion against its enemies. Imagine who are these “enemies?” They are those who seek to rid the peoples of injustice – banned by God – and to eliminate people’s persecution and repression, which religion came to alleviate.

At the beginning, we thought that it was a reactionary outburst which would eventually end. However, we were surprised by a coordinated, loud, noisy and very violent orchestra playing uninterruptedly against us. I, one, who has lived as a faithful Muslim and will die so, became an atheist according to them. They threatened to murder me. Somalia, which has been, throughout its entire history, Islam’s fortress and shield in East Africa, from where Islam was introduced and spread in Africa, became according to them, a communist and debased state.


Question: Can I ask, then, why the clash took place with the men of religion regarding the civil status law? And what led to executing 10 of them?

President Barre became excited and said immediately:

Answer: These were not ulemas or men of religion. They were not executed because they were so or because of the civil status law. During the trial, we found out that eight of them could not read or write. We asked one of them to recite one verse of the Qur'an, but he could not. We asked one of them to perform ablutions, and he began by washing his left foot. One of them was not a Somali, etc.

There were two sheikhs among them and the rest were ordinary agents and subversives.
We discovered that it was a wide-scale plan perpetrated abroad in accordance with specific moves and steps to take place after contacts with other bodies and organizations. There were attempts to infiltrate the armed forces and arouse its members. It was a general movement intended to topple the entire regime under the disguise of religion. It began from the mosques and moved to the streets. Its aim was to attract all forces in order to achieve its final goal.

Therefore, we struck mercilessly so that no one would dare to tamper with religion, and in order to prevent the rise of counterrevolutionary forces. The civil status law was a mere pretext. Any provision in the law could have been deleted or changed if demands were made to this effect.

But it could not be a reason for declaring the Revolution and the State atheist, and calling for the execution of its leader as well as calling on the people to take to the streets to cut our throats as a religious duty.

It was a counterrevolution disguising itself under the name of religion. The aim of this counterrevolution was to distort our image among the Arabs and Muslims. Those who made this clamour were part of the conspiracy from the beginning. We could have exposed them, we kept silent for stronger reasons and preferred to act patiently, because facts were to be revealed soon and our brethren and sincere friends would know that the issue was not one of religion or men of religion.

What has happened since the beginning is that on the occasion of the International Woman’s Day, we wanted to honour the Somali woman and restore to her all her rights and consideration, because the Somali woman was a major pillar in our old and contemporary struggle. Without her, it was impossible for Somalia to become free. Among the highest statues in Mogadishu is the statue of a woman who was martyred in the demonstrations and battles against the Italians. It is a symbol of the Somali woman. Since our society has chosen Scientific Socialism, it must provide the woman with her full rights and equality with men.
 

techsamatar

I put Books to the Test of Life
The adversaries encircling us, together with their imperialist Judea-Western overlords, aimed for our demise. They cunningly wielded religion and fomented rebel-Khawarij usurpation as their instruments, recognizing that a people united by common blood, language, and lineage could not easily succumb to the divisive tactics of ethnic warfare.

On this forum, nobody can argue that religion was used as a tool for the thirty-year bloodshed. The leader made it clear that the civil statutes law was just an excuse and could have been changed. In 1972-1973, right when he took control, well before any religious pretext, rebels tried to overthrow him but failed and fled to Ethiopia. This shows that Islam had nothing to do with it, considering his statements about religion hadn't even happened yet.
 

techsamatar

I put Books to the Test of Life
Where can one find these records/archives he alludes too? Where are the witnesses and the four Muslim attestors to support the assertions made by Judeo-Western sources? Do you expect me to accept accusations from non-believers that a fellow Muslim, who performed Hajj, prohibited Christian missionaries with evidence, and affirmed in an interview that he would die as a Muslim, said that?

And once more, this plot against our well-being, orchestrated by Judeo-Western powers, our neighboring nations, and the treacherous Khawarij rebels, was set in motion during 1972-1973. This occurred long before the allegations of Siad Barre being a non-believer and even preceding his descent into madness. What justification will you present in light of these facts?

" I, one, who has lived as a faithful Muslim and will die so"
 
Last edited:

Jungle

VIP
Where can one find these records/archives he alludes too? Where are the witnesses and the four Muslim attestors to support the assertions made by Judeo-Western sources? Do you expect me to accept accusations from non-believers that a fellow Muslim, who performed Hajj, prohibited Christian missionaries with evidence, and affirmed in an interview that he would die as a Muslim, said that?

" I, one, who has lived as a faithful Muslim and will die so"
 

hanif#

Somalo-Arab
@Omar del Sur I doubt @techsamatar is a Muslim. He keeps promoting Siad Barre and calls him a Muslim after I showed him clear visual evidence of his apostasy.

The 4th nullifier

3. Not regarding the mushrikeen as kuffaar (disbelievers)

Whoever does not regard the mushrikeen as kuffaar (disbelievers) and doubts whether they are disbelievers, or regards their beliefs are sound, is himself a disbeliever.

With regard to this nullifier of Islam, there is scholarly consensus that the one who does this is a disbeliever. What is meant by the “mushrikeen” here is one who was originally a disbeliever. Connected to them are those who commit an act of apostasy on which the scholars are unanimously agreed that it is definitely apostasy, with regard to an issue that is well-known to be a fundamental part of the religion, such as one who denies the resurrection, or who rejects a verse of the Book of Allah(Siad Barre did this), and other clear causes of apostasy concerning which there is no ambiguity.
 

techsamatar

I put Books to the Test of Life
@Omar del Sur I doubt @techsamatar is a Muslim. He keeps promoting Siad Barre and calls him a Muslim after I showed him clear visual evidence of his apostasy.

The 4th nullifier

3. Not regarding the mushrikeen as kuffaar (disbelievers)

Whoever does not regard the mushrikeen as kuffaar (disbelievers) and doubts whether they are disbelievers, or regards their beliefs are sound, is himself a disbeliever.

With regard to this nullifier of Islam, there is scholarly consensus that the one who does this is a disbeliever. What is meant by the “mushrikeen” here is one who was originally a disbeliever. Connected to them are those who commit an act of apostasy on which the scholars are unanimously agreed that it is definitely apostasy, with regard to an issue that is well-known to be a fundamental part of the religion, such as one who denies the resurrection, or who rejects a verse of the Book of Allah(Siad Barre did this), and other clear causes of apostasy concerning which there is no ambiguity.
Keep yapping scumbag, I'm engaged in a political discourse and conspiracy analysis, taking no sides. The non-believers include the eight agents incapable of reading, writing, or reciting Quranic verses, as well as the Khawarij rebels, may Allah make their graves constrict, and the 30 years of bloodshed they initiated in service of the Judeo-Western alliance.

I swear by Allah, I will not declare him a non-believer. He professed to have died upon Islam, and regarding his statement on that particular verse, it is conceivable that he repented, for every sin, including shirk, is forgiven with sincere repentance before death. Only Allah knows if he retracted that statement during all those years in exile.

Now, respond to this individual, asserting that the statement was not the cause of the civil war. The Khawarij hypocrites attempted their revolt in 1972-1973, predating Siad Barre's association with those statements. So, why do you and your sympathizers among the Khawarij focus on the chaos that ensued afterward and not the conspiracy that took place before?

@hanif# Present conclusive proof and evidence that he did not repent or retract his rejection of that verse. How can you brand someone a non-believer when you are uncertain about whether they died in a state of associating partners with Allah? He performed Hajj and Umrah, so isn't it plausible that during all those years in exile, he reconsidered and revoked his rejection of the inheritance verse?

Allaah has told us that he will forgive all sins for the one who repents to Him. He says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Say: ‘O ‘Ibaadi (My slaves) who have transgressed against themselves (by committing evil deeds and sins)! Despair not of the Mercy of Allaah, verily, Allaah forgives all sins. Truly, He is Oft‑Forgiving, Most Merciful’”

[al-Zumar 39:53]

This includes all sins, even shirk. Whoever repents, Allaah will accept his repentance.
 

hanif#

Somalo-Arab
I swear by Allah, I will not declare him a non-believer. He professed to have died upon Islam, and regarding his statement on that particular verse, it is conceivable that he repented, for every sin, including shirk, is forgiven with sincere repentance before death. Only Allah knows if he retracted that statement during all those years in exile.
We judge by the apparent. Public actions require public repentance. But I wouldn't expect an ignoramus like you to know such principles.

According to your logic we shouldn't declare Hitler, Richard Corfield, Winston Churchill and Benito Musollini disbelievers because there is a possibility that they repented and secretly converted to Islam.

As I said I highly doubt you are a Muslim.
 

tyrannicalmanager

pseudo-intellectual
@Omar del Sur I doubt @techsamatar is a Muslim. He keeps promoting Siad Barre and calls him a Muslim after I showed him clear visual evidence of his apostasy.

The 4th nullifier

3. Not regarding the mushrikeen as kuffaar (disbelievers)

Whoever does not regard the mushrikeen as kuffaar (disbelievers) and doubts whether they are disbelievers, or regards their beliefs are sound, is himself a disbeliever.

With regard to this nullifier of Islam, there is scholarly consensus that the one who does this is a disbeliever. What is meant by the “mushrikeen” here is one who was originally a disbeliever. Connected to them are those who commit an act of apostasy on which the scholars are unanimously agreed that it is definitely apostasy, with regard to an issue that is well-known to be a fundamental part of the religion, such as one who denies the resurrection, or who rejects a verse of the Book of Allah(Siad Barre did this), and other clear causes of apostasy concerning which there is no ambiguity.
what about the rebels who sought refuge in mengistu regime that destroyed 10k masjids?
 

techsamatar

I put Books to the Test of Life
We judge by the apparent. Public actions require public repentance. But I wouldn't expect an ignoramus like you to know such principles.

According to your logic we shouldn't declare Hitler, Richard Corfield, Winston Churchill and Benito Musollini disbelievers because there is a possibility that they repented and secretly converted to Islam.

As I said I highly doubt you are a Muslim.
where Hitler, Richard Corfield, Winston Churchill and Benito Mussolini Muslim ? did they also perform hajj and umrah and say this statement -
" I, one, who has lived as a faithful Muslim and will die so"

Am told am Madkhali, Wahhabi, and Hizbi Salafi, and another scoundrel is now doubting am Muslim pick a team. if my memory serves me right, you were one of the sympathizers of the Khawariju'l-Qa'diyyah (sitters). At what point does the act of declaring me an unbeliever come into play, and when does my blood become permissible?
 

hanif#

Somalo-Arab
where Hitler, Richard Corfield, Winston Churchill and Benito Mussolini Muslim ? did they also perform hajj and umrah and say this statement -
" I, one, who has lived as a faithful Muslim and will die so"

Am told am Madkhali, Wahhabi, and Hizbi Salafi, and another scoundrel is now doubting am Muslim pick a team. if my memory serves me right, you were one of the sympathizers of the Khawariju'l-Qa'diyyah (sitters). At what point does the act of declaring me an unbeliever come into play, and when does my blood become permissible?
I doubt you were a Muslim to begin with. I really think you are a larper.

where Hitler, Richard Corfield, Winston Churchill and Benito Mussolini Muslim ? did they also perform hajj and umrah and say this statement -
" I, one, who has lived as a faithful Muslim and will die so"
There is no point arguing with you. You are so retarded wallahi.

Both the original Kuffar and the apostates are disbelievers. So in order for us to consider them Muslims, they need to publicly state that they converted or reverted to Islam.
 

techsamatar

I put Books to the Test of Life
I doubt you were a Muslim to begin with. I really think you are a larper.


There is no point arguing with you. You are so retarded wallahi.

Both the original Kuffar and the apostates are disbelievers. So in order for us to consider them Muslims, they need to publicly state that they converted or reverted to Islam.
I constantly overlook the names of the Khawariju'l-Qa'diyyah bandits on this forum and the group surrounding @Omar del Sur. Engaging with you keyboard warriors seems like a waste of time for me, hindering my ability to post insightful threads.

The accusation of larping as a Muslim is a new addition to the inventory of terms thrown at me. It's becoming increasingly confusing, with labels ranging from being an extremist and Madkhali to doubting my Muslim identity. Perhaps, I'm creating confusion and thwarting your eagerness to declare me an unbeliever, especially since I Don't consider Muslim rulers in our era as a non-believer.
 

GemState

36/21
VIP
Socialism was only a serious thing for 85 years purely because it took over the Russian empire, and its immense economic potential. Had it successfully taken over a Finland it would've been meaningless.

We would have been much more successful just being openly Fascist and Nationalist like Indonesia. Flirting with Socialism was a terrible move
 

techsamatar

I put Books to the Test of Life
they were probably from their qabiil (the rebels who allied with christians/atheist to attack and subsequently destroy a muslim nation) so they wont takfir them.
LOL, it seems like we're on the same page. @hanif# and @Omar del Sur likely hail from the Clan of those Judeo-Western Khawarij rebels who couldn't recite the Quran, were unable to read or write, and began performing ablution with their left foot.

Even though I'm not Darood, it seems like no one wants to delve into the bigger picture. Instead, they immerse themselves in the aftermath, ignoring the genesis of the conspiracy that began in 1972-1973, before Siad Barre became paranoid about rebels or rejected the inheritance verse and advocated for women's equality. Despite considering himself a Muslim and performing Umrah and Hajj, only Allah knows the state he died in, which is none of my business.
 

hanif#

Somalo-Arab
only Allah knows the state he died in, which is none of my business.
Khawarij rebels who couldn't recite the Quran, were unable to read or write, and began performing ablution with their left foot.

Are you justifying the murder of more than a dozen of Ulema by a man who you admit to have committed kufr but don't know the state he died on

You are a walking contradiction. You seem to acknowledge that Siad Barre was wrong for denying the inheritance verses but accept and support his biased allegations against the ulema who differed with him and stood for haqq. Make it make sense!
 

techsamatar

I put Books to the Test of Life
Are you justifying the murder of more than a dozen of Ulema by a man who you admit to have committed kufr but don't know the state he died on

You are a walking contradiction. You seem to acknowledge that Siad Barre was wrong for denying the inheritance verses but accept and support his biased allegations against the ulema who differed with him and stood for haqq. Make it make sense!
If he murdered a dozen so-called ulema before the 1972-1973 failed coup and when Somalis were at peace but the conspiracy began to unfold, then yes, his motives were against the deen of Allah, which he explicitly stated to Egyptian Muslim interview states was not the reason but agents who shrouded their betrayal of a Muslim people in holiness.

All I want to emphasize and be concerned about is the period before his descent into madness and his determination to cling to power. Who initiated this fitna? Clearly, it wasn't him, as these events unfolded before he even made that particular statement. There's no excuse there. So, who committed the sin and went against the Quran and Sunnah first? Was it not those agents and rebels who started their plotting in mosques, then took to the streets, and eventually attempted to overthrow the ruler, leading his paranoia and to more chaos?

If those so-called scholars, where 8 out of the 10 couldn't even perform basic acts and lacked literacy, with one not even being Somali, I can understand why any ruler would be paranoid about such a conspiracy.

I request that you refrain from asserting or accusing me of statements I did not type and linking me to justifying any form of murder. I do not align with either camp among the Somalis – neither the Judeo-Western Khawarij sympathizers nor the Siad Barre cult members.
 
Top