You had a whole other thread where you used critical thinking? And now you can't even think why an unrecognized state might be underdeveloped and more closely resemble the parent state?
I know you love this ethnostate idea but you can't really argue this point. Somaliland will struggle to attract investment while it's legal title is under this politically unstable Somalia umbrella and it can't really cash out on the peace that's most been held for the last 30 years.
Let me ask you a question. In all of the coverage you have seen of the Ethiopia Somalia MoU has any commentator said it would be a bad idea for Somaliland to be recognized (for Somaliland not Somalia) or that it was of neglible value? That should explain to you the value or the consequences of being unrecognized and considered a part of Somalia.
You want to believe that Somaliland is better off in Somalia. You are starting with your conclusion and trying to work backwards but the facts don't add up that the ethnostate benefits all Somalis. For Somalilanders it's a problem security wise and a cost. Djibouti has done well away from the choas of Mogadishu, Somaliland will too soon I hope.
I'm not responding any more to this. You know the facts well enough you just can't accept them and that's not my business.
I’m glad we can agree on some things.
I never said Somaliland is better off with Somalia. What I am saying is that Somaliland isn’t becoming a sovereign state. The situation today is the best you will get.
Somaliland will remain part of Somalia legally and will remain impoverished while Somalia is impoverished.
When Somalia becomes stable and more developed, Somaliland will be too.
But by then, your selling point of being stable in the Horn and the success story will be irrelevant.
There will be a larger, richer and more developed democracy in the Horn right next door.
I hope you can now see the futility of secession. You are being held hostage due to not cooperating. Is it fair? No, but life isn’t fair.