I think he reads them cuz how does he know all the specificshis post sounded a lil personal that’s all kkkkkk
I think he reads them cuz how does he know all the specificshis post sounded a lil personal that’s all kkkkkk
Solid theory I have a feeling he’s a smut enthusiast himselfI think he reads them cuz how does he know all the specifics
I think so too. No man would know those tropes unless he was deep Into women’s business and reading those books LOLSolid theory I have a feeling he’s a smut enthusiast himself
I thought he caught his fictive wife reading it, turns out he was the wife all along kkkkkkI think so too. No man would know those tropes unless he was deep Into women’s business and reading those books LOL
I take it you're a woman, you weren't too happy about what I posted (female fiction being a pr0n racket disguised as literature) so your defense is to imply that I must secretly be into it. same line of argument as "huurr you don't like gays so you must be gay!!!"uuhgghh I'z cant REED tf u talm bout a dog nigga for? HER HUZBAND FUK WITH IT SO ITS OKAY my iq is 70 NIGGA
Comparing watching two naked people having sex is 5x worse it’s legit Zina of the eyes, than a romance novel. Like by every single metric. Prn is doubly degrading and men who use this talking points are a joke. Obviously reading sex scenes is haram and also harmful, but the harms of Prn can never be downplayed.there are thousands of married couples, where the wife spends her time reading these "romance novels" where the self insert main character is taken by cowboy/biker/mafia/dog-creature man. she's fantasizing about cuckolding her husband, but the nacas is oblivious and thinks shes reading an actual book.
Let her catch him wanking it to some pr0n tho, half his paycheck gone for eternity
Watching two people legit have sex will always be 5x worse. When men use this argument is nothing but cope.Romance novels are basically literature corn usually involves a white girl or man on vacation in far away lands and finds an exotic beauty and then after a few months they never see them again and dream about them for the result of there life
The “hot Latin lover”is the most common trope
Romance novels have extremely detailed descriptions of sex I know it’s not the same as corn but dreaming about other shirtless men having “adventures ”whith an exotic beauty is a violation of martial trustWatching two people legit have sex will always be 5x worse. When men use this argument is nothing but cope.
Not all romance novels have sex scenes but all prn is basically degrading and ONLY about sex.
ImAgine comparing a woman fantasizing about being with a man that treats her well to that of a man watching a real life woman being spat on and being used and is watching her body in 4k with many of these girls being underaged.
Men and their whataboutism is very funny. We have corpus literature of the evils of prn backed by science and how it’s as addictive and alcohol at times.
Let’s look at romance genres in general. From Cinderella, to Beauty and the beast being the same as prn? Men have lost their marbles. If a woman reads these types of stories about love without the sex element is that a violation? What is it? The fact that she likes romance and hopes her husband embodies that?Romance novels have extremely detailed descriptions of sex I know it’s not the same as corn but dreaming about other shirtless men having “adventures ”whith an exotic beauty is a violation of martial trust
Most corn stars are not underaged there adults who are willing to make money of doing degenerate things
you go into this as if these books are like some romance manga where they confess in the grand finale or something, 95% of these are have explicitly sexual material in them as @The truth seeker said.Comparing watching two naked people having sex is 5x worse it’s legit Zina of the eyes, than a romance novel. Like by every single metric. Prn is doubly degrading and men who use this talking points are a joke. Obviously reading sex scenes is haram and also harmful, but the harms of Prn can never be downplayed.
You’re worried by about a fiction story about love, but think a man literally watching a woman naked and degraded is the same? Prn addiction has ruined society wallahi.
Corn hub will never be closed they’ll just change there vpn to Mexico City and they’ll be fine democrat states like Minnesota would not even botherLet’s look at romance genres in general. From Cinderella, to Beauty and the best being the same as prn? Men have lost their marbles.
As for romance with sex scenes this is immoral and haraam, especially if graphic but it will never ever be on the same level of evil as prn. Men who say this are coping in astronomical ways.
Even men women read this sexually charged books which they shouldn’t, they’re dreaming of romance and kindness yet men watch the most degrading shit if a underaged exploited girl getting spat on and strangled and now so many men hate women.
Watching actual real like naked people will always be more of a violation of trust than someone reading a story.
He has valid points but those are absolutely not the same. One is way worse than the other. One is Zina and well, the other isn’t.Comparing watching two naked people having sex is 5x worse it’s legit Zina of the eyes, than a romance novel. Like by every single metric. Prn is doubly degrading and men who use this talking points are a joke. Obviously reading sex scenes is haram and also harmful, but the harms of Prn can never be downplayed.
You’re worried by about a fiction story about love, but think a man literally watching a woman naked and degraded is the same? Prn addiction has ruined society wallahi.
Zina of the mind kulaha, niggas out here making up their own Islamic laws. Reading about sex vs actually seeing it are not on the same level. Women are not out here masturbating to romance novels, smut or not.you go into this as if these books are like some romance manga where they confess in the grand finale or something, 95% of these are have explicitly sexual material in them as @The truth seeker said.
there's also a key difference in the male and female psychology. we are more stimulated visually, women tend to be more in their heads.
of course watching a 8/10 hottie getting fucked with all sorts of camera tricks to pique our lizard brains even more is not good, most of us know this. watching p0rn is a detaching experience, you lose self awareness during it and when you're done you feel a repulsion. it's pretty much like getting drunk or taking drugs, similar effect on the mind.
with these books on the other hand, the author has the intention of making the reader (female) project herself onto the the main character, and often women will do exactly that and make herself subject to the books setting, and the "object" character/love interest will be consciously compared to the men in the readers life. the reader is not detached but immersed into it.
if visual prn is zina of the eyes then these books are zina of the mind, eyes perceive reality while the mind experiences it.
I believe its fine to read romance novels that are not explicit and are not meant for escapism. Male or female. One should not be reading explicit novels, outside and inside marriage.Corn hub will never be closed they’ll just change there vpn to Mexico City and they’ll be fine democrat states like Minnesota would not even bother
All I was saying was romance novels are women mentally cheating on there husbands please ask yourself would you allow your husband to read a romance novel where the main character had a extremely detailed sexual encounter with a “exotic ”woman ?
cindarella was written by a man, BatB was authored by a woman and interestingly enough it's the one with the giant animal man who keeps the heroine locked in a dungeon until she gives in to him lolLet’s look at romance genres in general. From Cinderella, to Beauty and the beast being the same as prn?
they’re dreaming of romance and kindness
As someone who grew up with BatB and all these other stories, do you really think we are into beastiality? You want us to be as vile as degenerate men, we see your agenda.cindarella was written by a man, BatB was authored by a woman and interestingly enough it's the one with the giant animal man who keeps the heroine locked in a dungeon until she gives in to him lol
a lot of these nice and tame romances are written by the men, i believe "romance" is just another thing men came up with to civilize women.
i remembered this movie which was getting glazed beyond belief by the literary critics and swept awards, about a fish-man who seduces a human female (even tho he can't even speak), the heroine has a husband but he's a controlling type, he's also shown to be sexually inadequate at one point. at the end the fish man "takes" her and kills the husband. he eats her cat (no snarky joke he actually eats her pet cat) 10/10 brilliant movie, best picture winner, something something patriarchy.
As someone who grew up with BatB and all these other stories, do you really think we are into beastiality? You want us to be as vile as degenerate men, we see your agenda.
Quit playing in my mentions