Ditch the term Horn Africa for terms like Adalistan, ifataynia, Ajuurland, Harlanda……
Yeah i remember that thread, they were making assumptions of us being inbred when in reality we are the purest of Cushites, we basically kept our stock ever since Proto-Nilotic and Natufians mixed, that’s why we cluster close to the ancient Neolithic pastoralists Kenya and Tanzania.
Who is habeshas? What about saho?Those guys are still 20% Mota bear in mind. They're not like us.
Population | Main Ancestry Components | Neanderthal DNA | Denisovan DNA | Ghost/Archaic African DNA | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horn Africans | East African + West Eurasian | ~0.5–1.5% | Trace | ~2–5% (unknown archaic African) | High Eurasian back-migration; ancient African depth |
West Africans | West African hunter-gatherers | None or Trace | None | ~8–19% (unknown archaic African) | Deep African ancestry with ghost DNA |
Europeans | Out-of-Africa + West Eurasian | ~1.5–2.1% | Tiny/None | None | Descended from non-African lineages post-migration |
East Asians | Out-of-Africa + East Eurasian | ~2–2.3% | ~0.1–0.3% | None | Slightly more Neanderthal DNA than Europeans |
Melanesians | Out-of-Africa + Oceanian | ~2% | ~4–6% | None | Highest Denisovan DNA globally |
What do you guys think of this sub Reddit
Acting having mota is bad in fact they got better genesThose guys are still 20% Mota bare in mind. They're not like us.