I respectfully disagree. Let's take issues of natural ressources first. Federal states such Jubbaland wants to regulate its use all without the Federal government intervention. The reasoning being that it is local issues but I contend that the ressources found in the Somali soil belongs to all Somalis.
It has two main downsides:
1: It would lead to unequal sharing of one our greatest ressources and make some state very rich and other poor.
2: It would lead to greater corruption as the executive and legislature that oversees is entrenched in the local community allowing for gentle agreement or self-serving agreement. Having agreement about ressources invokes greater discussion and offers greater oversight.
Now unto the issues of Bay and Boykol: Af may-may is already recognized as a national language and there is no argument to replace.
Will we allow a place for religious scholars in the justice system or will we adopt a civil code?
Regarding religious scholars the current constitution regards Sharia as being above it and therefore they will probarely be a big part and they have great control in Somalia and it would cause great problems if they didn't. Somalia will return to having a dual system with some reserved to Islamic court like divorce and inheritance and civil code for more earthly needs such as a tax code.
Should we go back to having a strong PM as the executive and have the President only set the general agenda?
Now to the issues of PM. I personally would like to seem the united but the report makes a great for having a strong PM that is subordinate to the President and Parliament giving stability such Somaliland.
Should we move the capital?
We should not move the capital, it will cause too much of an uproar.
When will a census be held? Far into the future
On what basis will parliamentary districts be drawn? The best option is having a single district with proportional voting making each vote count equally as much
Will 4.5 be codified in law?
2020 election is conditioned on free and fair election without 4.5 but it will probably be institutionalized until the civil war is fully over.
Thank for the discussion. What are your own thoughts?
I disagree with you on two points natural resources and allowing religious scholars to have a say in criminal/civil law.
In the case of natural resources I don't like the focus on potential oil revenues. If we are going to talk about natural resources let us include everything. For example; Puntland gives a portion of any potential oil revenues to be redistributed, but we get farmland in Hiraan in return. You see how this is untenable! The way things are headed now, sharing resources will probably fall harder on regions with resources like oil, for example, that need government permission to be exploited by foreign corporations. This is why I would rather have the power to issue natural resource licenses in the hands of the federal states. This way I protect what I might have, knowing that the other side will not share their farmland with me.
On the issue of religious scholars being involved in the judicial system, I totally disagree. It is a slippery slope that many countries now regret stepping on. If you give them a role no matter how small it will continue to expand until they directly challenge the authority of civil rule. You have to let them know that they have no legal authority, and that they will face many years in jail if they question the legal rulings of any judge. I would allow them no space in judicial matters.