Iranian shi'ism exposed
Cigaal
يا نبي سلام عليك
Doesn't really fit this topic but it seems like an interesting video. Maybe make your own post about the origins of wahhabismNo, but I watched this one:
Does that count?
AIOPZ
Pan-Islamist
Are you Muslim by any chance?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
I don't really care about gaining your respect, sorry. Allah (SWT) is the one I look to for guidance, and I wish to follow none other than the path of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW). If you consider that to be a "dangerous ideology", then that's on you. I'm sorry that you've been brainwashed by the gaals into hating your own diin, or at least the diin of you walad.
youre not a muslim @Lolalola
just call yourself salafi you don't represent Muslims am tired of you kafirs taking the islam label you don't speak for us, just because we don't agree with you don't make us gaals it is you who are gaals
terrorrit khawrij salafi scumbags
you dont speak for us
AIOPZ
Pan-Islamist
>I NEVER SAID shias dont do terrorism, i siad they dont kill somali muslims which is true
> you showed me shiia muslims killing israeli soldiers israeli civilians american soldiers and bulgarians mostly non muslims
i showed you terrorist kuffar salafis killing muslims in afghanistan in iraq yemen syria and most importantly somalia
Yeah, you did, but okay.
Also, they've killed Muslim civilians in their goal to kill Israelis. They've also partaken both the Syrian and the Iraqi war.
Last edited:
AIOPZ
Pan-Islamist
youre not a muslim @Lolalola
just call yourself salafi you don't represent Muslims am tired of you kafirs taking the islam label you don't speak for us, just because we don't agree with you don't make us gaals it is you who are gaals
terrorrit khawrij salafi scumbags
Holy Prophet(p.b.u.h) said: If a Muslim calls another kafir,
then if he is a kafir let it be so; otherwise, he [the caller] is himself a kafir.”(Abu Dawud, Book of Sunna)
Abu Zarr reported that the Holy Prophet(p.b.u.h) said: No man accuses another man of being a sinner, or of being a kafir but it reflects back on him if the other is not as he called him.”
-(Bukhari, Book of Ethics; Book 78, ch. 44)
You may not agree with me politically, but did I ever take part in any war of Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, etc.? No? Then why is your anger reflected towards me?
they attacked a petro plant which is still a legitimate military target:siilaanyolaugh:
also they dont purpoursly target civilians nor condone it is forbidden to kill civilians
also the war in iraq and syria was to kill salafi terrorists like isis
shiaah did a good thing killing isis who have been killing muslims in iraq syria and afghanistan even targetting innocent in europe i support all the the bave shiia fighters who killed the bastard daesh salafi kuffars
AIOPZ
Pan-Islamist
they attacked a petro plant which is still a legitimate military target:siilaanyolaugh:
also they dont purpoursly target civilians nor condone it is forbidden to kill civilians
also the war in iraq and syria was to kill salafi terrorists like isis
shiaah did a good thing killing isis who have been killing muslims in iraq syria and afghanistan even targetting innocent in europe i support all the the bave shiia fighters who killed the bastard daesh salafi kuffars
They help Assad against all resistance groups. Need I remind you that Assad kills his own people, including many innocent Muslims with no affiliation to ISIS?
the syrian war was hijacked by salafi terrorist groups like isis
the muslim sunnis like free syrian army got attacked by salafi isis and the revelution ws hijacked by isis
then the syrian army was the lesser of two evils it was ethier them or the salafi kuffars
i choose the syrian army may against salafi kuffar liars like isis who kill innnocents civilians and take innocents hostage and cut peoples heads of
assad became the liberator of syria from salafi terrorists like isis
> isis salafis kill innocents and justify it under jihad they even do suicide bombings and justfify that as islamic
> assad barrel bombs cities to kill salafis but sometimes kill innnocents diffrence he never justifies it
Because these people feed on your support, regardless of whether it's explicit or implicit. A lot of people have been brainwashed into thinking that the Wahhabist version of Islam is the best possible form of Islam, and a lot of people sympathise with them due to propaganda - that's why these terrorist are able to hide within Muslim countries. In your case you're actually Salafi, so it isn't just that you sympathise with them - you're one, an untriggered bomb. Don't even try making this into people hating Islam - it's only your poisonous vile sect that's been criticised here. Salafism is not Islam; it's more akin to a cancerous tumour that has grown on Islam!
becosue you salafi bastards are waging a war on sunni muslims who follow the sunnah and not the evil death cult created by a terrorist abdul wahab
you bastards declare takfir on us call us gaal and kill us everywhere, let me tell you something
you bastard kufffars you are not muslims you are kafirs who hijacked islam
may allah bless the mujahideen of ahlul sunnah the destroyers of the kuffar salafis
may allah grant them jannah ameen
we will wipe you out of somalia you khawrij salafi scum bastards
AIOPZ
Pan-Islamist
The goal of Salafism is to adhere to the example of the Salafs or the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and his companions (RA), their successors, and the successors of the successors, while rejecting all other sources of influence. It's an Islamic revivalist movement intended to emulate the early Muslim generations. Modern jihadism is an extremist form of Salafism that intends to overthrow supposedly apostate regimes in the Muslim world through violent holy wars. Anyone can be a Salafi, as Salafism means very different things to different people. The term “Salafism” is often associated with terrorism and violence in media discourse, both in the West and in the Muslim world, particularly since the 9/11 terrorist attacks. This is very unfortunate as many Salafis reject such acts of violence and often insist on not being associated with the perpetrators of these attacks by rejecting the latter as worthy of the label of “Salafis.” So not all Salafis even agree that jihadists can be called Salafis. “Salafi," referring as it does to what is believed to be the best generations of Islam, has come to acquire an aura of religious authority. It is, in other words, a term that gives the impression of purity and authenticity to its bearers, thereby making it a desired label to apply to oneself.
The Salafi origins can said to have been traced to the 8th-9th century as a movement of hadith scholars who considered the Quran and authentic hadith to be the only authority in matters of law and creed and said that, in the absence of the Prophet (SAW), the large number of traditions ascribed to Muhammad were a better, purer, and more authentic source of what Muslims should or should not do than the opinions of the scholars. While contempary Muslim of the time strived to live pious lives according to the rules of their respective madhab, which truly value and greatly appreciate the Qurʾān and the Sunna but combine them with other sources of law, the hadith scholars focused entirely on these two texts at the expense of almost everything else in the legal sphere.
The Wahhabi movement, the prominent source of inspiration for modern-day Salafism, started through a pact between Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and the tribal leader Muḥammad ibn Saud. Wahhabi scholars advocated for a return to the pious predecessors, the Salaf, as other scholars had done in the Islamic sphere. Most of their ideology focused on cleansing Islam from deviant influences that it had acquired throughout the centuries. Wahhabi scholars sought to restore the purity of Islam under the guidance of the Saudi rulers. Attempts to return Islam to the purity of the Salaf—legally, theologically, or sometimes both—have been part of Islam for centuries. The only thing truly special about Wahhabism is that it gave actual Salafi scholars and adherents a territorial base in Saudi Arabia that has lasted until today.
Salafism is not homogeneous as the only thing that unites self-proclaimed Salafis is the desire to emulate the pious predecessors, which means very different things to different people. Often times however, they reject the excessive spiritualism associated with Sufism, the deviant doctrines of the medieval rationalist Muʿtazila movement, and the supposedly compromised and sullied message of the Sunni Ashʿari/Al-Maturidi theology.
"So here is the issue that needs to be clarified:Many people use the abbreviation “SAW,” “SAWS,” or “PBUH” to fulfill this obligation in their writing. Is this something that fulfills the obligation of sending the salaah and salaam on the Messenger? Let us look now to some of the statements of the scholars regarding this practice. The Permanent Committee of Scholars in Saudi Arabia headed by ‘Abdul-‘Azeez ibn ‘Abdillaah ibn Baaz issued the following verdict when asked about the validity of abbreviating the salaah on the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam): “The Sunnah is to write the entire phrase “sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam,” since it is a kind of supplication, and supplication is worship, (in one’s writing) just as it is in one’s speech. So to abbreviate it using the letter SAAD or the word SAAD-LAAM-‘AYN-MEEM is not a supplication nor is it worship, whether it occurs in speech or writing. For this reason, this abbreviation was not used by the the first three generations, those that the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam) testified to their goodness.” [8] “SAAD” and “SAAD-LAAM-‘AYN-MEEM” are often used in some Arabic books. The English equivalents of these abbreviations would be: SAW, SAWS, SAAWS, PBUH, and the likes. Al-Fayrooz-Abaadee said, “It is not appropriate to use symbols or abbreviations to refer to salaah and salaam, as some of the lazy ones do, as well as some ignorant people and even some students of knowledge – they write ‘SAAD-LAAM-‘AYN-MEEM’ instead of writing ‘sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam.'” [9] Ahmad Shaakir said, “It is the absurd tradition of some of the later generations that they abbreviate the writing of ‘sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam.'” [10] Wasee Allaah ‘Abbaas said, “It is not permissible to abbreviate the salaams in general in one’s writing, just as it is not permissible to abbreviate the salaah and salaam on the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam). It is also not permissible to abbreviate either of these in one’s speech.” [11] And Allaah knows best. May the most perfect and complete salaah and salaam be upon our beloved Messenger, and upon his noble family and companions."
FOOTNOTES [1]
written by Moosaa Richardson
Wahhabism does not exist. Its called Salafi. The kuffar in the past called muslims Mohammedians. A`oodhu Billah (I seek refuge with Allah from the accursed satan). We muslims should verify information given to us be whoever they may be, but that does not constitute backing a muslim. He preached pure Tawheed(monotheism) read his work instead of listening to youtube scholars who may not even have the formal background and may not even be known among the scholars of the past or present as someone good to take knowledge from. And Allah knows best.Doesn't really fit this topic but it seems like an interesting video. Maybe make your own post about the origins of wahhabism
You have indeed spoken the truth brother, and may Allah (Subhanahu wa Ta'ala) elevate our success in this world and in the hereafter. Ameen.
AIOPZ
Pan-Islamist
I've heard from Islamic scholars online that writing sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam is better as people--especially non-Muslims who would have not otherwise been able to say it out loud--are more likely to verbally say this out loud. I assumed that since this is already a Muslim-majority website, people would understand already how to say this and the addition of (SAW) would encourage them to say the actual name out loud. However, I will admit it's mostly laziness from my part to type out the whole thing so from now on I'll try to write it all out
Shukran, brother. There is no point on missing out on ajar when it's very easy to write Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam) without abbreviations.Got it, brother. Keep it going.I've heard from Islamic scholars online that writing sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam is better as people--especially non-Muslims who would have not otherwise been able to say it out loud--are more likely to verbally say this out loud. I assumed that since this is already a Muslim-majority website, people would understand already how to say this and the addition of (SAW) would encourage them to say the actual name out loud. However, I will admit it's mostly laziness from my part to type out the whole thing so from now on I'll try to write it all out
