PHILOSOPHY Is Dictatorship Inherently Bad?

[Sheikh Kulkuli]

there is no freedom in china

Go tell that to George folyd family.

 

[Muzaffer]

Go tell that to George folyd family.

hahaha, Americans have the right to choose their leader and remove him.

and proof of this is that when gorge Floyd died most American protested against what happened to him and the policeman get arrested

 

[reer]

hahaha, Americans have the right to choose their leader and remove him.

and proof of this is that when gorge Floyd died most American protested against what happened to him and the policeman get arrested

americans electing a imbecile like trump is a major argument against democracy neefyahow. people will sacrifice free speech in exchange for getting them out of extreme poverty. if you want a democratic flourishing utopia that will not with somalis.

 

[reer]

wait hold a minute at what if he stayed in power and died a natural death,

Iraq will break apart

no one is saying they were ideal but it is not worth overthrowing them if there is high chance of complete societal and state collapse and anarchy.

 

[Muzaffer]

no one is saying they were ideal but it is not worth overthrowing them if there is high chance of complete societal and state collapse and anarchy.

even if he dies naturally anarchy will come anyway

 

[Aurelian]

americans electing a imbecile like trump is a major argument against democracy neefyahow. people will sacrifice free speech in exchange for getting them out of extreme poverty. if you want a democratic flourishing utopia that will not with somalis.

democratic systems improve themselves by change with time, while in dictator systems there's only the system without any changes. Most dictatorship countries lack freedom, decent life, and state of law and equality. There's only the delusional stability, which will vanish with the slightest crack in the system, which causes chous.

 

[reer]

even if he dies naturally anarchy will come anyway

no. the power vacuum is reserved to higher ups and elite fighting over power. and the average populace stay out the big kursi.

democratic systems improve themselves by change with time, while in dictator systems there's only the system without any changes. Most dictatorship countries lack freedom, decent life, and state of law and equality. There's only the delusional stability, which will vanish with the slightest crack in the system, which causes chous.

for somalis
absolute monarchy > dictatorship > democracy

demoracy opens up a power vacuum and a strategic 3rd world country to become a playground for foreign interests atleast every 4 years. and the populace are dumb qat munchers. imagine being a phd holder and asking a degenrate drug addict to choose you. i ask Allah to save the good somalis from such humiliation.

 

[Muzaffer]

no. the power vacuum is reserved to higher ups and elite fighting over power. and the average populace stay out the big kursi.


for somalis
absolute monarchy > dictatorship > democracy

demoracy opens up a power vacuum and a strategic 3rd world country to become a playground for foreign interests atleast every 4 years. and the populace are dumb qat munchers. imagine being a phd holder and asking a degenrate drug addict to choose you. i ask Allah to save me from such humiliation.

these elites in his party will start arming their militias and start a bloody war.

 

[reer]

these elites in his party will start arming their militias and start a bloody war.

stalin died and the ussr did not descend into anarchy.

 

[Aurelian]

no. the power vacuum is reserved to higher ups and elite fighting over power. and the average populace stay out the big kursi.


for somalis
absolute monarchy > dictatorship > democracy

demoracy opens up a power vacuum and a strategic 3rd world country to become a playground for foreign interests atleast every 4 years. and the populace are dumb qat munchers. imagine being a phd holder and asking a degenrate drug addict to choose you. i ask Allah to save the good somalis from such humiliation.

The same thing can be applied to the dictatorship and monarchy, look at the African leaders, they are dictators and do accept the West's orders. At least with democracy and state of law, you can hold them accountable for their actions

 

[Muzaffer]

stalin died and the ussr did not descend into anarchy.

well, when Lenin died Stalin started the great purge. and Russia lost tens of millions.

 

[reer]

The same thing can be applied to the dictatorship and monarchy, look at the African leaders, they are dictators and do accept the West's orders. At least with democracy and state of law, you can hold them accountable for their actions

look at museveni and idi amin compared to other african leaders who were democratic. they are top 10 african presidents. one expelled colonial asians the other stopped majority of his people being destitute.
democracy is stupid because idiots can choose presidents.
in countries without a streamline foreign policy dictatorship is needed to avoid chaotic democracy and make quick harsh decisions like expulsion of british brought asians from uganda or the somali script.

well, when Lenin died Stalin started the great purge. and Russia lost tens of millions.

did the ussr descend into chaos and complete destruction? did it becone a failed state? no. same as when stalin died.

 

[Aurelian]

look at museveni and idi amin compared to other african leaders who were democratic. they are top 10 african presidents. one expelled colonial asians the other stopped majority of his people being destitute.
democracy is stupid because idiots can choose presidents.
in countries without a streamline foreign policy dictatorship is needed to avoid chaotic democracy and make quick harsh decisions like expulsion of british brought asians from uganda or the somali script.


did the ussr descend into chaos and complete destruction? did it becone a failed state? no. same as when stalin died.

Your point revolves around stupid people voting, assuming that all voters are idiots, which is not in most cases.

You are ignoring that on idi amin's reign 300 000 to 500 000 people died in the hands of Amin's men, infrastructures collapsed, the economic situation was hell, corruption spread.

 

[reer]

Your point revolves around stupid people voting, assuming that all voters are idiots, which is not in most cases.

You are ignoring that on idi amin's reign 300 000 to 500 000 people died in the hands of Amin's men, infrastructures collapsed, the economic situation was hell, corruption spread.

sometimes your options are not ideal. i am not delusional i know alot of countries cannot be a utopia with prosperity and democracy. idi amin was a ruthless dictator but his dictatorship was better than namibian neo apartheid which was what uganda might have become. i dont look at what i cant get. i look at what i have on the table.
dictatorship/absolute monarchy in 3rd world countries in strategic places is better than democracy.
yes majority of people in somalia are drug addicts and dumb. vast majority should have absolutely no right in choosing a leader.

 

[Celery]

Yes, dictatorship is inherently bad. However, it is also necessary in many situations, especially if the population has an average IQ of 68. Ideally, all citizens would peacefully participate in a democracy.

 

[bobsburger]

Yes, dictatorship is inherently bad

Not really. There is nothing islamicly wrong with being a dictator of a country as long as you follow the law of Allah.

 

[Celery]

Not really. There is nothing islamicly wrong with being a dictator of a country as long as you follow the law of Allah.

But those kinds of dictators don’t exist. They make laws that keep them ruler forever, because of their low IQ corruption.

 

[libaaxad]

dictatorships work in 3rd world countries because nobody has the energy to fight and the government usually gives them food and education, but in first world countries they do not work.

 

[bobsburger]

But those kinds of dictators don’t exist. They make laws that keep them ruler forever, because of their low IQ corruption.

They used to exist and they will probably make a comeback. As long as a ruler is kept in check by the deen he will be straight

 

[kingcharlesskull]

Libya: From Africa’s Wealthiest Democracy Under Gaddafi to Terrorist Haven After US Intervention

Libya: From Africa's Wealthiest Democracy Under Gaddafi to Terrorist Haven After US Intervention

Tuesday marks the four-year anniversary of the US-backed assassination of Libya’s former leader, Muammar Gaddafi, and the decline into chaos of one of Africa’s greatest nations. In 1967 Colonel Gaddafi inherited one of the poorest nations in Africa; by the time he was assassinated, he had...

www.counterpunch.org

never try to be grandiose if a dictator of a former italian colony. Mi6 doesn't like it when an ex- roman catholic colony does well.