Now, I could be entirely misunderstanding how this all works, but I swear with so many other results I see people have distances in the 3-4 range, for their very closest ancient samples (although many of the results I've seen are European/Anglo/White of some kind, so maybe there's some correlation there). But yeah, I'm wondering what gives? Could it just be because they have more samples or something? I have zero speculation to even put forward.
Are your closest ancient samples about as distant as mine? For the closest sample on my list to be at 14.5~ meanwhile some people's closest are almost 4 times less than that is stunning lmao. There's probably all sorts of reasons why, but I'm totally ignorant. Any ideas would be great!
Sorry if this is a stupid question also btw. Thanks!
Are your closest ancient samples about as distant as mine? For the closest sample on my list to be at 14.5~ meanwhile some people's closest are almost 4 times less than that is stunning lmao. There's probably all sorts of reasons why, but I'm totally ignorant. Any ideas would be great!
Sorry if this is a stupid question also btw. Thanks!