I hear the first point being parroted so much by communists, it's ridiculous. One thing a communist doesn't understand is the concept of a "win-win" situation, if I open a factory in Bangladesh and the workers there are earning $5 a day before I arrived and I offer $10 a day to workers to produce goods, this is an improvement on the workers quality of life, not exploitation.While it is significantly better than what people have now, it still has the capitalist greed within, I've mentioned it before but here's why I don't agree with this idea
1: the standard of living still relies on the exploitation of the global south/third world countries.
2: The profit motive is tamed at best, but not abolished. That means that corporations and capitalists will still use the state to implement the laws they want.
3: A welfare state with good worker rights and social democracy is not permanent, reforms can always be taken away if the threat of revolution weakens. People used to have something like this in the past but it got rolled back precisely because of the weakening of this threat.
4: why I believe any form of lenient capitalism is inferior to communism is because the goal of communism is a stateless, classles society in which the free development of the individual is the condition for the free development of all, That would include people choosing their own economic future and keeping the fruits of their labour, without the dangers of the ruling class sweeping in and taking everything back.
@Apollo is right though. It's highly unlikely to happen in our lifetime as corporations will influence governments to take action
The South Asian workers in Dubai are a good example, they come in the tens of thousands to work manual labour as they will get double the amount of money they would have gotten in their home countries, and the Arabs get their infrastructure built, this is a "win-win" not exploitation.
In a free market, the variety of business and the openness of commerce and opportunity create environments which allow greater economic freedom, making people way less likely to be singularly dependent, it creates market competition which forces businesses to pay the most sensically possible, when X, Y, and Z want B, the price of B increases, as the three people have to compete to get B, this is basic supply and demand economics.
Anyway, the rest of the flaws you just listed are nothing compared to the amount of damage communism will cause if it is reinstated.