Modern British are less than 1% native British

[Hybrid()]

Hunter gatherers who lived in the British isles for 1000s of years were almost completely replaced by neighboring farmers around 6000 years ago. Those Hunter gatherers could've had darker skin tone and blue eyes according to their genetics
Today they account less than 1% of modern day British ancestry. Paleolithic and Mesolithic hunter gatherers had poor reproduction rate. They couldn't even populate an island as they had to compete with carnivorous predators who also preyed on them.

Ancient DNA shows migrants introduced farming to Britain from Europe

Farming was brought to Britain by migrants from continental Europe, and not adopted by pre-existing hunter-gatherers, indicates a new ancient DNA study led by UCL and the Natural History Museum, in collaboration with Harvard University.

www.ucl.ac.uk

 

[Qeelbax]

So they are aboriginal australians with blue eyes????
So blue eyes is actually a mutation? Because if it was weather then this nigga wouldn’t be so dark?

 

[Hybrid()]

So they are aboriginal australians with blue eyes????
So blue eyes is actually a mutation? Because if it was weather then this nigga wouldn’t be so dark?

There's a theory that Eurasians evolved light skin as a result of vitamin D deficiency but that's not entirely accurate. Light skin and light eyes in humans and animals were probably as a result of genetic mutation

 

[Tambien]

I never got why people got offended so much by the dark skin, he's not black and nor does he look it.

 

[Qeelbax]

There's a theory that Eurasians evolved light skin as a result of vitamin D deficiency but that's probably nonsense. Light skin and light eyes in humans and animals were probably as a result of genetic mutation

That’s what they taught us in class, some science class during high school.

They were talking about how Native Americans in the north like Inuit still weren’t pale skinned as compared to Scandis and shit. But anyway it’s because once they got their beige/yellowish skin tone, they received the other vitamin d from the fish they ate therefore they didn’t need to become pale skinned to adapt to the climate.

 

[Qeelbax]

I never got why people got offended so much by the dark skin, he's not black and nor does he look it.

Who’s offended? Whites?

 

[Qeelbax]

There's a theory that Eurasians evolved light skin as a result of vitamin D deficiency but that's not entirely accurate. Light skin and light eyes in humans and animals were probably as a result of genetic mutation

Yes I remembered right
https://scienceline.org/2007/06/ask-dricoll-inuiteskimos/

 

[Hybrid()]

That’s what they taught us in class, some science class during high school.

They were talking about how Native Americans in the north like Inuit still weren’t pale skinned as compared to Scandis and shit. But anyway it’s because once they got their beige/yellowish skin tone, they received the other vitamin d from the fish they ate therefore they didn’t need to become pale skinned to adapt to the climate.

Theories are theories. It could be true or it could be nonsense

 

[Qeelbax]

Theories are theories. It could be true or it could be nonsense

You’re right. They say your features depend on the climate too, but inuit don’t look like North Europeans. So yes everything is just a theory. I do think colored eyes are a genetic mutation hence why some random dark skinned ethnic groups have colored eyes/lighter hair.

 

[Hybrid()]

Yes I remembered right
https://scienceline.org/2007/06/ask-dricoll-inuiteskimos/

Hunter gatherers were able to get some of their vitamin D requirements from animal organs such as the liver so another theory can say that humans began to evolved light skin after they began farming

 

[Based]

We wuz da natives?

 

[Mount23]

Light skin is a recent phenemenom, Cadaans are mutated bastards

 

[The alchemist]

The light-skin phenotype came from their near eastern side that migrated from modern Turkey and another distinct later steppe ancestry. The hunter-gatherers were dark-skinned.

Any sedentary group will out populate and organize a system that deals with resource protection and extraction, with a section of able-bodied men, get hired to fight to maximize territorial control or defend against any potential threat to the stratified society/cultures, mainly elites that centralize and concentrate wealth and influence. This will completely dominate the hunter-gatherers, which always forces them to either play the same game for competition or stagnate, leading to less likelihood for survival.

 

[Tambien]

Who’s offended? Whites?

Yeah, whites thought it was a liberal agenda
He might've been lighter than this like light brown but I doubt they intended to make him black

That’s what they taught us in class, some science class during high school.

They were talking about how Native Americans in the north like Inuit still weren’t pale skinned as compared to Scandis and shit. But anyway it’s because once they got their beige/yellowish skin tone, they received the other vitamin d from the fish they ate therefore they didn’t need to become pale skinned to adapt to the climate.

Intense sexual selection is also given as a reason

 

[Affliction]

So they are aboriginal australians with blue eyes????
So blue eyes is actually a mutation? Because if it was weather then this nigga wouldn’t be so dark?

No they aren’t

 

[Qeelbax]

No they aren’t

I don’t actually mean they’re are aboriginal Australians, I mean that dude looks like them than the franks I see. If this is about blue eyes being a mutation then yes it is a mutation

 

[Hybrid()]

Modern human Hunter gatherers were all stronger than us but European HG (Cro-magnon) were the biggest and most muscular modern human. Their bones are much more robust and solid, just slightly less robust than Neanderthals probably because they settled in freezing Europe as early as 45,000 years ago, giving them enough time to evolved like their Neanderthal cousins.
Now I know why some Europeans can get very large and keep dominating strongman competitions

A cro-magnon man from France dating back 28,000 years

 

[Apollo]

I think they exaggerated how dark skinned European hunter-gatherers were. It is only based on the idea that they lack a handful of depigmentation alleles that occurred later in West Eurasians, but at the same time these European HGs could have also lacked the genes that make Africans dark as well.

I think they likely had the skin tone of Thai people rather than Sub-Saharan Africans. It would be weird to be that dark in the ice age while having inhabited a cold area for 10,000s of years.

 

[SOMALI GENERAL]

I think they exaggerated how dark skinned European hunter-gatherers were. It is only based on the idea that they lack a handful of depigmentation alleles that occurred later in West Eurasians, but at the same time these European HGs could have also lacked the genes that make Africans dark as well.

I think they likely had the skin tone of Thai people rather than Sub-Saharan Africans. It would be weird to be that dark in the ice age while having inhabited a cold area for 10,000s of years.

Uncanny resemblence

On a serious note, I've met a British folks who look like their Hunter Gatherer ancestors. They tend to be shorter & have very robust skull shapes etc.

 

[The alchemist]

Modern human Hunter gatherers were all stronger than us but European HG (Cro-magnon) were the biggest and most muscular modern human. Their bones are much more robust and solid, just slightly less robust than Neanderthals probably because they settled in freezing Europe as early as 45,000 years ago, giving them enough time to evolved like their Neanderthal cousins.
Now I know why some Europeans can get very large and keep dominating strongman competitions

View attachment 210881
A cro-magnon man from France dating back 28,000 years

The height of Western Hunter-Gatherer was decent even relative to today. Older Upper Paleolithic Gravettian men estimated on average to be 183.5 cm.