Modern warfare

[TheLand]

Bow and arrows not unstoppable if you have shield can survive and reload times long. Compare to machine gun vs infantry. Or even sniper shooting u while eating lunch. Don’t get me started on drones, rockets and chemicals. This is what Palestinians facing. If they were facing arrows and swords from Jews Palestinians would be whooping their ass and not getting slaughtered by thousands while Israel barely looses anything

No I agree with you it is very cowardly and is getting more cowardly. I’ve always thought that. Cowardice is why Israel can defeat all Arab countries combined. They want to be geesiyaal fighting close quarters urban combat while yahuud just bombs away from the 30k feet in the sky.

Btw, wait until they harness the energy of dark matter to make bombs that can even tear the universe apart.

 

[Hilmaam]

No I agree with you it is very cowardly and is getting more cowardly. I’ve always thought that. Cowardice is why Israel can defeat all Arab countries combined. They want to be geesiyaal fighting close quarters urban combat while yahuud just bombs away from the 30k feet in the sky.

Btw, wait until they harness the energy of dark matter to make bombs that can even tear the universe apart.

Jews scary smart and evil. They created nukes. They are able to hack everyhting. A lot of the weapons and tech arab countries probably receiving compromised. Soon as they try to go against Israel all their onboard computers on jets, missile defense and rockets probably will fail. They next level technologically

 

[TheLand]

Jews scary smart and evil. They created nukes. They are able to hack everyhting. A lot of the weapons and tech arab countries probably receiving compromised. Soon as they try to go against Israel all their onboard computers on jets, missile defense and rockets probably will fail. They next level technologically

I think being on the brink of extermination makes you stronger kkkk

 

[Hilmaam]

Somalis were murdering each other long before the AK47 arrived and became widespread. It wouldn’t change anything except the casualties numbers and how clashes/skirmishes would be fought

True but we didn’t have suicide bombers blowing up graduations and schools. There was a system and code for fighting called birmagade. Doesn’t exist today as much. use foreigner drones and weapons to bomb villages, set up mines, combatants wearing hijab with bombed strapped to them and killing random civilians. A lot of the war is deception today. It’s wrong to fight within ourselves but at least people should meet in battlefield until 1 side victorious and treat other side humanely after loss

 

[TheLand]

True but we didn’t have suicide bombers blowing up graduations and schools. There was a system and code for fighting called birmagade. Doesn’t exist today as much. use foreigner drones and weapons to bomb villages, set up mines, combatants wearing hijab with bombed strapped to them and killing random civilians. A lot of the war is deception today. It’s wrong to fight within ourselves but at least people should meet in battlefield until 1 side victorious and treat other side humanely after loss

There was a guy who started a thread on here about combat drones in Somalia and I told him to delete it for this very reason

 

[Hilmaam]

Precisely! In Islam it’s haram to even fight a man who runs from the battlefield and now it’s socially acceptable to throw massive explosives on open air prisons, go after elderly, children, women, civilians,etc.The bombs also destroy the earth as well at alarming rates which is super caasi, just like how Isreal bombed Syria and it was the explosive equivalent to a 3.0 magnitude earthquake! Subhannallah where’s the humility and benevolence in that? Pure cowardice

It’s mind boggling numbers killed by America and its proxies in Muslim world. Millions lost in Afghanistan , Iraq, Libya, Syria, Palestine because of western subjugation. Only west is arrogant enough to tell people how to live and govern themselves. Never see this with giant nation like China who also has capability to do massive damage. Will be good day when scales are balanced and bravest and strongest warriors successful

 

[Hilmaam]

I do think we will be set back technologically. This happened throughout history as well in other scales and proportions.

I'm not saying the case that people in the past were as technologically advanced as they are today, but regimes of relative advancement reached peaks, then collapsed with the descendants not even being able to remember or carry on knowledge or systemic know-how to revive it.

It's hard to make a pistol from scratch. So if systems are broken, knowledge is forgotten, swords and lithics are what's left to use. And you're right, men had better skin in the game when they did warfare the traditional way.

There is also the passing of time. These wars could happen in a couple of millennia for all we know. The Prophet (PBUH) could have meant that we're near the end times knowing humans have been here for a very long time; relative to 50,000 years or longer, a few millennia is nothing. I don't think any of the countries we see today exist then (the US, Germany, and Russia). The entire global order as we have it today probably will not persist in those times because technology and distributed systems are what support technology and systems manufacturing.

True civilization rise and fall. Hopefully these nuclear powered countries don’t take most of world with them when they fall.

 

[loyaa_n]

I do think we will be set back technologically. This happened throughout history as well in other scales and proportions.

I'm not saying the case that people in the past were as technologically advanced as they are today, but regimes of relative advancement reached peaks, then collapsed with the descendants not even being able to remember or carry on knowledge or systemic know-how to revive it.

It's hard to make a pistol from scratch. So if systems are broken, knowledge is forgotten, swords and lithics are what's left to use. And you're right, men had better skin in the game when they did warfare the traditional way.

There is also the passing of time. These wars could happen in a couple of millennia for all we know. The Prophet (PBUH) could have meant that we're near the end times knowing humans have been here for a very long time; relative to 50,000 years or longer, a few millennia is nothing. I don't think any of the countries we see today exist then (the US, Germany, and Russia). The entire global order as we have it today probably will not persist in those times because technology and distributed systems are what support technology and systems manufacturing.

Or.....supersuits.....on men....and....horses

I can see it

 

[indigoblack]

The future of warfare is going to be swarms of drones powered by A.I software

The days of niggas running around gunning each other down in a battlefield is coming to an end

That’s officially boomer shit


Lots of venture capital has also recently been poured into start-ups that are trying to advance HPM (High Power Microwave) technologies

HPM systems generate intense electromagnetic energy fields that can disrupt electronic systems ( so they can shutdown the drone swarms )

a company called Epirus is currently leading the HPM tech space

---

The guy that invented the Oculus VR headset - Palmer Luckey

Palmer Luckey’s new company (Anduril Industries) is also working on autonomous war aircraft’s powered by A.I

His company’s been making big moves in the defense-tech space and they’re going to be the future leaders over Lockheed, Raytheon , Boeing , etc ( soon… )



Going to be interesting to see how this all plays out in the future

 

[World]

I do think we will be set back technologically. This happened throughout history as well in other scales and proportions.

I'm not saying the case that people in the past were as technologically advanced as they are today, but regimes of relative advancement reached peaks, then collapsed with the descendants not even being able to remember or carry on knowledge or systemic know-how to revive it.

It's hard to make a pistol from scratch. So if systems are broken, knowledge is forgotten, swords and lithics are what's left to use. And you're right, men had better skin in the game when they did warfare the traditional way.

There is also the passing of time. These wars could happen in a couple of millennia for all we know. The Prophet (PBUH) could have meant that we're near the end times knowing humans have been here for a very long time; relative to 50,000 years or longer, a few millennia is nothing. I don't think any of the countries we see today exist then (the US, Germany, and Russia). The entire global order as we have it today probably will not persist in those times because technology and distributed systems are what support technology and systems manufacturing.

You can 3d print guns based on open source files, we’re never going back.

 

[Idilinaa]

Spoiler: ..

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

View attachment 350788

Lost potential , they were planning on building an active defense production industry in the 80s.

But you will perhaps see it sooner than later.

 

[The alchemist]

You can 3d print guns based on open source files, we’re never going back.

And we can just use the Tesla factories if we're sent back to the Stone Age. We're never going back, baby!

 

[Basra]

I am OLD and don't care.

 

[Basra]

Jews scary smart and evil. They created nukes. They are able to hack everyhting. A lot of the weapons and tech arab countries probably receiving compromised. Soon as they try to go against Israel all their onboard computers on jets, missile defense and rockets probably will fail. They next level technologically

if they are this clever then they deserve to rule the world

 

[Hilmaam]

if they are this clever then they deserve to rule the world

If might is right maybe lol

 

[Hmohamed54]

I do think we will be set back technologically. This happened throughout history as well in other scales and proportions.

I'm not saying the case that people in the past were as technologically advanced as they are today, but regimes of relative advancement reached peaks, then collapsed with the descendants not even being able to remember or carry on knowledge or systemic know-how to revive it.

It's hard to make a pistol from scratch. So if systems are broken, knowledge is forgotten, swords and lithics are what's left to use. And you're right, men had better skin in the game when they did warfare the traditional way.

There is also the passing of time. These wars could happen in a couple of millennia for all we know. The Prophet (PBUH) could have meant that we're near the end times knowing humans have been here for a very long time; relative to 50,000 years or longer, a few millennia is nothing. I don't think any of the countries we see today exist then (the US, Germany, and Russia). The entire global order as we have it today probably will not persist in those times because technology and distributed systems are what support technology and systems manufacturing.

Im guessing you watch lost civilization.

 

[Hmohamed54]

Lost potential , they were planning on building an active defense production industry in the 80s.

But you will perhaps see it sooner than later.

Pathetic

 

[The alchemist]

Im guessing you watch lost civilization.

I have seen it. Not what I am referring to though.

There is no evidence the past was ever like it is today. But I'm open to the idea that civilization can be built and destroyed. Do I believe in what Graham Hancock believes in, some kind of unified civilization during the ice age, no. There is the possibility of civilizations that were local or regional, not global. Potentially more advanced than hunter-gatherers, but nothing like we have today. Though I don't think there is any evidence of that. Still, I would not doubt it. There is some truth to what Graham Hancock says but he tends to exaggerate.

For example, people were quick to dismiss what he said about the Sphinx being much older than what the archeologists initially dated it. Later, we found out that the Sphinx was built on top of a lion-like boulder that had been shaped by the wind for a very long time. Ancient Egyptians inspired by the pseudo-lion shape, subsequently cut the rest up as we recognize it today. Graham Hancock was correct that it was much older, the archeologists were wrong in dismissing him, but overall he was incorrect by jumping the gun with the overreach of inferring those data to indicate the age of Ancient Egypt was much older.

That is sort of where I stand. I am open to things. I dislike the narrow-minded people who take personal insults to people who want to explore alternative ways outside traditional archeology, however, there is a level of disciplinary approach to my reasoning ways where I still keep things critical on both ends.

Another example, like how laymen get so triggered when the brother Terrance Howard yapped about science-sounding things - most people who were outraged and angry were at the basic level of understanding, if even that. Every "know-it-all" dweeb turned into a scientist:

This was an insufferable trend. Every nerd came out with the:

While scientists with real depth of knowledge might look at it and think, is there something he says that is correct? Or maybe they get amused. They would not get bent out of shape since science dogma is the nonsense the low-level person consumes. If the bums understood how wacky science becomes once you peel the layer of basic competency, it becomes wilder than what Terrence talks about. At best Terrence Howard, through his unorthodox ideas, can give insightful conceptual language that can be interesting. Right? If it's not real it is entertaining. Doesn't make his overall thinking real, or legit. He probably is very wrong. In some ways, he is demonstrably wrong (like in the case of religion). I find the "well, have I ever" pompous outrage cringe.

All this to say, don't box me in, bro. I'm not one of you if you're 100% alternative. I'm not one of them.

 

[Idilinaa]

Pathetic

Whats pathetic about it? If Somalis set up high tech military factories we will increase our capacity to manufacture arms, vehicles and so on and that will decrease our military dependencies. It's a good thing because we can evade being crippled by arms embargos and crack down on the illegal arms trade much more.

 

[Hmohamed54]

Whats pathetic about it? If Somalis set up high tech military factories we will increase our capacity to manufacture arms, vehicles and so on and that will decrease our military dependencies. It's a good thing because we can evade being crippled by arms embargos and crack down on the illegal arms trade much more.

Sorry i don’t remember replying to you. I think it was meant for something else.