axmedxajiisback
Amr ibn Hisham
The argument goes something like this: Christians are blasphemers because they associate partners with Allah. How could Allah have a son when he created everything? The Quran maintains that Jesus was never actually crucified and it only appeared that way to people at the time. Not only was he not crucified, he never rose from the dead or claimed deity.
The only problem (s) are these
- Christians believe that God entered into his creation in the form of man and not that god had a biological son. So the argument about partners with Allah is invalid.
- The Quran claims that the word of god cannot be corrupted, and yet Muslims claim his word in the bible has been corrupted by man. By this logic, the Quran could've easily been corrupted.
- There are literally no Christians or people that lived in Jesus' time that believed he wasn't crucified, rose from the dead and claimed deity. If no one knew that Jesus WASN'T crucified, Allah intentionally misled hundreds of millions for millennia only to tell them in the 7th century that they were wrong.
- So, the "corrupt book" argument is invalid for the reason I stated and the non-crucifixion story says something really bad about Allah
This is coming from an atheist who doesn't believe in Christianity by the way. It's just pathetic how you Muslims bought Muhammad's propaganda hook line and sinker.
The only problem (s) are these
- Christians believe that God entered into his creation in the form of man and not that god had a biological son. So the argument about partners with Allah is invalid.
- The Quran claims that the word of god cannot be corrupted, and yet Muslims claim his word in the bible has been corrupted by man. By this logic, the Quran could've easily been corrupted.
- There are literally no Christians or people that lived in Jesus' time that believed he wasn't crucified, rose from the dead and claimed deity. If no one knew that Jesus WASN'T crucified, Allah intentionally misled hundreds of millions for millennia only to tell them in the 7th century that they were wrong.
- So, the "corrupt book" argument is invalid for the reason I stated and the non-crucifixion story says something really bad about Allah
This is coming from an atheist who doesn't believe in Christianity by the way. It's just pathetic how you Muslims bought Muhammad's propaganda hook line and sinker.