Let me guess your source for this: the Koran/ahadith?All the prophets preached the same message as Islam until Paul came along with his blasphemy
Let me guess your source for this: the Koran/ahadith?All the prophets preached the same message as Islam until Paul came along with his blasphemy
Are you stupid lol? Of course it's only considered blasphemy according to Islam. If you mean Paul's message, than is a historic fact and you can read up on it from a non religious point of view too. It's well known that Paul is the father or modern day Christianity and was the first to declare Jesus is the son of God.Let me guess your source for this: the Koran/ahadith?
Deifled is not a fucking a word. f*ck man get a grip.I said deified not defied. Also go learn your own religion I shouldn't have to tell you the role Paul played in modern day Christianity, and in declaring Jesus as the son of God.
Also I gave you him as an example of Christians who weren't followers of the false prophet Paul.
All the prophets preached the same message as Islam until Paul came along with his blasphemy
It's deified as in to make something a deityDeifled is not a fucking a word. f*ck man get a grip.
What's your obsession with Paul? Did you know Paul? How do you know he "corrupted" Christianity and didn't just convey the truth? Again, there is no great debate about the fundamentals of Christianity.Are you stupid lol? Of course it's only considered blasphemy according to Islam. If you mean Paul's message, than is a historic fact and you can read up on it from a non religious point of view too. It's well known that Paul is the father or modern day Christianity and was the first to declare Jesus is the son of God.
Saying "are you stupid? lol" doesn't lend your inane argument any credibility. That "all the prophets preached the same message as Islam," is not a historical fact or a fact of any sort. It's a religious claim made only in Islam. It's fine to believe in what you want, as far as religion goes, but it's laughable to try and present it as a universally acknowledged and veritable truth. I'm getting the impression that you're not very bright.Are you stupid lol? Of course it's only considered blasphemy according to Islam. If you mean Paul's message, than is a historic fact and you can read up on it from a non religious point of view too. It's well known that Paul is the father or modern day Christianity and was the first to declare Jesus is the son of God.
What the f*ck? Yeah? Sources?What a fool! Jesus a.s was a Prophet of God, he foretold his people of the final Messenger of God in the bible of the Paraclete who would guide mankind
What the f*ck? Yeah? Sources?
I get the impression you don't know anything about religion. Ask any one who follows an abrahamic faith what Noah preached, what Abraham, David, Isra'el preached they all will tell you to call to the Lord of the Universe and even if they believe in some other jibber jabber, the Book will make it evident what that message was.Saying "are you stupid? lol" doesn't lend your inane argument any credibility. That "all the prophets preached the same message as Islam," is not a historical fact or a fact of any sort. It's a religious claim made only in Islam. It's fine to believe in what you want, as far as religion goes, but it's laughable to try and present it as a universally acknowledged and veritable truth. I'm getting the impression that you're not very bright.
What's your obsession with Paul? Did you know Paul? How do you know he "corrupted" Christianity and didn't just convey the truth? Again, there is no great debate about the fundamentals of Christianity.
You don't view it as one god because that is what you chose to believe. It's not a carefully studied conclusion. Muhammad threw a monkey wrench into a thousand years of Christian belief to diminish what people thought of Jesus and installed himself as the most important human. I have a question for you: are you sure it's Christians that are polytheists when you have to proclaim La Illaha Ilallah Muhammad Rasuul Allah as a proclamation of faith? You literally associate a partner with Allah while complaining about Christians.
Everything happens with his permission. How do you know the Quran wasn't corrupted with his permission and that a thousand years later a new prophet will tell you that? After all, the Christians weren't told that the book would eventually be corrupted until Muhammad came along. They thought the word of god was eternal and incorruptible, just like you.
If god entered his creation who was doing god's other duties? He's god. He's capable of appearing as a man and doing everything else god does.
Why did Jesus say "why have you forsaken me?" The story of Christianity is god acting like a man and experiencing what a man experiences. Like a man being murdered on a cross, he cried out like a man would. God, according to you and others, can do many things at once. He CAN appear as a man and at the same time torture that man he appears as. You claim to be a believer in god and yet this flies over your head.
I know everything about the crucifixion of Jesus. Yes his disciples did run away when they saw him being murdered. Hundreds of people saw that same guy that was murdered three days later and dozens of people met him. It is to these people that he claimed deity, ruled over and lived a sinless life. If you are going to make dumbass claims, do research.
Yes, the bible is in effect what the Quran is talking about. It's dozens of books with over 40 authors. If you don't know, the Quran claims to be the word of god but was written down and organized by men.
There were Unitarian churches? These churches never doubted the death, deity and resurrection of Christ. They just had a bone to pick with the framing and the whole trinity talk. Under NO circumstance did they say that Jesus wasn't killed, didn't rise from the dead and claim deity. That's just not true. You can't make things up to feel better.
You need to learn the difference between your religious beliefs and historical facts.And yes it is a historical fact that Paul is the father of Christianity, and if you don't believe me then go do your own research or show me solid evidence to back up your point, don't expect me to spoonfeed you what should be common knowledge.
Paul is the real founder of christianityYou need to learn the difference between your religious beliefs and historical facts.
All the prophets preached the same message as Islam before Paul ≠ historical fact.
Paul's influence on Christianity is not in question. This particular claim is. Back it up.
You need to stop learning your history from shit sites like answering-christianity.com
war cunug saqiir ah oo caano la siinaayo matihide, go do your own researchYou need to learn the difference between your religious beliefs and historical facts.
All the prophets preached the same message as Islam before Paul ≠ historical fact.
Paul's influence on Christianity is not in question. This particular claim is. Back it up.
You need to stop learning your history from shit sites like answering-christianity.com
The argument goes something like this: Christians are blasphemers because they associate partners with Allah. How could Allah have a son when he created everything? The Quran maintains that Jesus was never actually crucified and it only appeared that way to people at the time. Not only was he not crucified, he never rose from the dead or claimed deity.
The only problem (s) are these
- Christians believe that God entered into his creation in the form of man and not that god had a biological son. So the argument about partners with Allah is invalid.
- The Quran claims that the word of god cannot be corrupted, and yet Muslims claim his word in the bible has been corrupted by man. By this logic, the Quran could've easily been corrupted.
- There are literally no Christians or people that lived in Jesus' time that believed he wasn't crucified, rose from the dead and claimed deity. If no one knew that Jesus WASN'T crucified, Allah intentionally misled hundreds of millions for millennia only to tell them in the 7th century that they were wrong.
- So, the "corrupt book" argument is invalid for the reason I stated and the non-crucifixion story says something really bad about Allah
This is coming from an atheist who doesn't believe in Christianity by the way. It's just pathetic how you Muslims bought Muhammad's propaganda hook line and sinker.
New International Version
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
King James Bible
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Darby Bible Translation
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only-begotten Son, that whosoever believes on him may not perish, but have life eternal.
World English Bible
For God so loved the world, that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish, but have eternal life.
Young's Literal Translation
for God did so love the world, that His Son -- the only begotten -- He gave, that every one who is believing in him may not perish, but may have life age-during.
There are literally no Christians or people that lived in Jesus' time that believed he wasn't crucified, rose from the dead and claimed deity. If no one knew that Jesus WASN'T crucified, Allah intentionally misled hundreds of millions for millennia only to tell them in the 7th century that they were wrong.
- Christians believe that God entered into his creation in the form of man and not that god had a biological son. So the argument about partners with Allah is invalid.