Nilotic
VIP
@Nilotic
Could you perhaps from time to time contribute to the Culture and History section with theories/articles etc on the origins of Nilotes. I haven't done too deep research into it and you seem like a specialist in it.
I read some stuff that it isn't even a real language family, but just a 'left over' group lazy European linguists grouped all non-Niger-Congo and non-Afro-Asiatic Africans in who live above the equator.
However, genetics does show it is a real group.. although there are many many odd outliers/edge cases, especially the Nilo-Saharan speakers in the Western Sahel (Songhai), North Sudanese Nubians, and even many of the ones living on the border area between Ethiopia-Sudan who aren't directly tied to the Anuak-Dinka-Nuer seem a bit unique genetically (often related to Paleo-Omotics - 50-50/75-25 between them and the Anuak-Nuer). The Kunama and Nara also seem very odd to me, some theories out there that they came from East Chad / Darfur and migrated East a millenia or so ago (they got linguistic cousins in East Chad called the Maban grouping) and mixed with Eritreans subsequently. Lastly, many people don't know this but the Mbuti Pygmies are technically Nilotes (linguistically) and obviously have different origins as well. Nilotes are way more complex than people think.
I'll make some effort to contribute to that section with my knowledge on my people.
Nilotic, Surmic and Gumuz are all definitely related populations, but I have heard that the Nilo-Saharan phylum is not as concrete.
The Nubians, Toubou, Fur, Masalit, Zaghawa, Nara and the other residents of the Central Sahara are the Saharan component of the Nilo-Saharan group and could probably be their own language family.
There are Nilotic tribes in Southern Chad as well, so I wonder if the Saharans and the proto-Nilotes separated from each other in the Central Saharan region.
The Mbuti Pygmies apparently speak Central Sudanic languages -- which are ostensibly part of the Nilo-Saharan phylum; the relationship between them hasn't been firmly established.
Nilotic is a very specific linguistic group and the languages are all very closely related; the Mbuti are not part of that specific grouping. It would seem that Mbuti is merely part of another branch (Central Sudanic) within Nilo-Saharan.
I think that the distance between Central Sudanic and Nilotic is significant.
What I found strange was the Nilotic link with the San via the A-M32 clade and the connection between the Nilote Y-DNA A-M13 and Khoisan A-M51.
Nilotics seem to be related to everyone in the continent.