Actually many of bible stories are supported and also published by many classical islamic hostorians tabari in tarikh alrusul wal miluk. Dhababi, mas'udi, suyuudi, and basically every other ancient islamic historians. The ruling is that if those biblical athar dont contradict hadith and quran, like prescribing horrendous defilement of character to prophets such Lud, Noah etc than its okay to take such athar.Also the Quran unlike the Bible doesn’t mention these inaccuracies like time period for example which is why Christian and Jews derive the incorrect notion that the earth is a certain amount of years old, it also doesn’t mention these sons, they possibly did not exist in Islam other than the one who got flooded while in judeochristian books they go into detail( fabrications) and talk about how they think Abraham got so drunk that he was raped by his son, which is beilived by bible scholars that not only did it not happen or this son probably not exist but it was written thousands of years later to justify a genocide,
In Islam we don’t believe in these stories of children not mention in the Quran for Noah or lut or other wicked story’s and fabrications in the Bible