No income growth for 60 years in some African countries

Status
Not open for further replies.
This charlatan quotes Malthus who was a proponent of Eugenic, a white supremacist, racist that wanted to exterminate the lesser races like his Godfather fellow satanist Darwin idealised.

The guy who believed the world was overpopulated and that the British empire for which he was cheap ideologue should embark on a sterilisation program in Asia/Africa to exterminate his own people, typical class A coon.

Notice how he totally ignores the wholesale looting of Africa, the military dictatorship, the financial castration, the facilitation and encouragement of corruption, the appointments of puppet leaders under brute force etc. he wants to ignore all of that of course, even the recent studies proving that Africa pretty much industrialised Europe, even John Pilger did a documentary about it detailing how Africa enriched the west.

Just today the news broke that the USA Mafia is sending 500 additional troops to Somalia to facilitate the loot of his own country under the false pretext of fighting terrorists.




 

Apollo

VIP

Europe is fucked if they keep Merkel-style policies:

worlds-most-important-graph-2017-f.png
 

Yonis

Puntland Youth Organiser
FKD Visionary
VIP
A trillion Africans in 2200. :siilaanyolaugh:
I guanrantee you the SJWs have made the horn of africa look like congo by then. And people call us crazy when we propose controlling the current bantu fertility rates
 
@Thegoodshepherd do you accept the ''red pill'' that there is probably something cognitively/genetically wrong with Sub-Saharan Africans causing the years of under-performance? I think that simple, but harsh fact explains 80% of Africa's problems.

You need to do more research before you spew shit like that sxb: Islamic sultanates in sub-saharan Africa were some of the most powerful and developed empires in history for example Timbuktu was one of the major hubs of education and knowledge in the world during those times. The Africa we see today is the result of colonisation and pillaging. Do you think the Europeans would have been much better off if the same thing happened to them in a parallel universe?
 

Apollo

VIP
You need to do more research before you spew shit like that sxb: Islamic sultanates in sub-saharan Africa were some of the most powerful and developed empires in history for example Timbuktu was one of the major hubs of education and knowledge in the world during those times. The Africa we see today is the result of colonisation and pillaging. Do you think the Europeans would have been much better off if the same thing happened to them in a parallel universe?

Look at performances post-1960s, especially in comparison to Asia, Eastern Europe, and Latin America.

You are in denial. Just accept it.

Perhaps gene therapy may save Africa. There's some hope. I doubt they would be as morally hesitant to it.
 

RasCanjero-

Self imposed exile
But Europe 100 years ago, which was much less developed and had a much less uniform education, also had a lower IQ.
Why does everyone have to jump to race and not think about the fact that maybe African countries have a lower average IQ because they have less access to things like education compared to the West? Wouldn't it be smarter to compare the IQ of Sub-saharan Africans living in the West to those of Europeans?
Then, you have fewer confounding factors to throw off the comparison, like living standards or language or education.


Selective pressures increased the IQ in the West more than any other factor in the past century.

Sure people ate better and lived around educated people but that didn't improve their IQ by over 20-30 points.

Remember the difference between an IQ of 70 and 100 is a legal retard and someone able to help build powerplants.

Jobs got more complicated and in order to keep up; only the smartest got decent paying jobs and in turn were the ones picked for marriage.

This didn't happen overnight but if you prevent the dumbest 20% from passing on their genes for around 5 generations you get a dramatic increase in the overall IQ scores.

Not practicing arranged marriages probably helped the cadaans aswell.

AA's didn't have the same opportunities 5-6 generations back; so they kept to a different mate selection strategy.

Somalis practiced arranged marriages for the most parts of our history so there were no selective pressures for higher IQs.

Maybe Somali fathers should request IQ tests of their potential son in-laws before letting them in the house.
 
Look at performances post-1960s, especially in comparison to Asia, Eastern Europe, and Latin America.

You are in denial. Just accept it.

Perhaps gene therapy may save Africa. There's some hope. I doubt they would be as morally hesitant to it.

Do you believe we live in a fair world whereby all parties are given an equal opportunity to develop?
 

Apollo

VIP
Do you believe we live in a fair world whereby all parties are given an equal opportunity to develop?

AI will probably lead to equality-of-outcome policies as AI will be even smarter than the top 5% of humans soon.

Africa will get to parity with the rest of the world when AI comes around.
 

DeathWish

Hotep and Hebrew Israelite
African Americans are a good ''natural experiment'' of introducing Sub-Saharan Africans into a first world country and see the outcome. They aren't doing well. Even despite decades of affirmative action and the like.

Recent migrant Africans may not be representative as they are selected for skills.
Please, please do some research before spewing such toxic b.s!

The fact is that white women are disproportionately likely to benefit from affirmative action policies. But affirmative action has been quite beneficial to women, and disproportionately beneficial to white women.
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/affirmative-action-white-women_us_56a0ef6ae4b0d8cc1098d3a5


White women benefit most from affirmative action — and are among its fiercest opponents

https://www.vox.com/2016/5/25/11682950/fisher-supreme-court-white-women-affirmative-action


That’s how we arrived at our curious cul-de-sac on affirmative action, which has made it harder for Asian Americans to get into elite colleges.
Department who could examine a 2015 complaint by a coalition of 64 Asian American associations claiming that Harvard University discriminated in its admission policies. Research from Princeton University sociologists shows that Asian Americans need SAT scores 140 points higher than white students — when all other things are equal — to get into elite colleges. Asian American applicants are heavily overrepresented among high-achieving students, so the only way we can create balance on our campuses — or so the argument goes — is by limiting their admissions.

So now men enjoy affirmative action, vis-à-vis women. And most of the recipients of this assistance are whites, who also receive an advantage when competing head-to-head with Asians. But benefiting the white male over a superior Asian American or female candidate makes no sense; indeed, it makes a mockery of affirmative action itself.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...400c5c7e1cc_story.html?utm_term=.939a7cb355a1

Please do some research!!!

------------> IQ <-------------
Somalia is environmentally fucked. Hyper-arid land and no oil. Destined to be poor.

But those Bantu countries have the natural resources of countries like France.
This has nothing to do with IQ and resources! This has everything to do with neo-colonialism!

And Jacques Foccart, an influential businessman and ally of de Gaulle, developed a network of
French and African politicians, leaders and businessmen to maintain control in the former colonies.
This network, its actions and the policies it employed, became known as Francafrique .

This story reveals the lengths the former colonial power has gone to - from coups and assassinations to rigged elections and embezzlement - in order to satisfy its thirst for energy.
People who were involved in this network also rigged elections and orchestrated coups.
The French government even paid for one African leader to become an emperor - only to later overthrow him

http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/specialseries/2013/08/201387113131914906.html



The United States instigated the invasion of the DRC by its proxies Rwanda and Uganda
in 1996 and 1998, and the subsequent slaughter of 6.9 million Congolese has devastated the country. Washington’s goal was to plunder the enormous mineral riches of the Congo through the proxy use of Rwanda’s and Uganda’s troops.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-congo-still-ravaged-by-u-s-funded-conflict-and-plunder/5375098



You already know that Somalia is also being looted. Amèrîca already stole a huge amount of ûrànium that Hillary sold to Russia. Stop being ignorant and do some research!
 
Somalia is environmentally fucked. Hyper-arid land and no oil. Destined to be poor.

But those Bantu countries have the natural resources of countries like France.
We have access to the a big ass coastline and we starve when 3 billion Asians literally live on seafood. Beat that.
 

RasCanjero-

Self imposed exile
We have access to the a big ass coastline and we starve when 3 billion Asians literally live on seafood. Beat that.

Nomadic groups had to stay on the move constantly in order to avoid raids from other tribes but most importantly find water and feed for our livestock.

Apart from the river region controlled by southern tribes; there were limited water sources near our coast which prevented long term habitation.

Those that did were easy prey for other clans who were aware of their fixed location... same reason why lots of proto-kingdoms failed in Somalia.

I'm glad we didn't though as we would've ended up as different people.
 
Nomadic groups had to stay on the move constantly in order to avoid raids from other tribes but most importantly find water and feed for our livestock.

Apart from the river region controlled by southern tribes; there were limited water sources near our coast which prevented long term habitation.

Those that did were easy prey for other clans who were aware of their fixed location... same reason why lots of proto-kingdoms failed in Somalia.

I'm glad we didn't though as we would've ended up as different people.
There are 14 million Somalis and every year we have 100s of thousands dying of hunger and droughts. My point was Indhayar survive on seafood, and we could turn to our oceans to prevent starvation every single year but eating fish is beneath us right? Somalis aren' any smarter than bantus. Most Bantu countries in Africa have functioning governments and we dont.
 

Merchant of Mogadishu

From Pella to Pattala, then back to Babylon
There are 14 million Somalis and every year we have 100s of thousands dying of hunger and droughts. My point was Indhayar survive on seafood, and we could turn to our oceans to prevent starvation every single year but eating fish is beneath us right? Somalis aren' any smarter than bantus. Most Bantu countries in Africa have functioning governments and we dont.


You do know that due to the civil war, foreign vessels have repeatedly dumped toxic waste onto our shores, completely destroying the livelihood of so many fishermen, killing countless fish and causing people who live by the sea to get cancer from the toxicity.
 

Apollo

VIP
We have access to the a big ass coastline and we starve when 3 billion Asians literally live on seafood. Beat that.

They have taboos on eating fish and look down on people who eat fish. Also, they look down on farmers.

Somalis have a self-defeating culture.
 
You do know that due to the civil war, foreign vessels have repeatedly dumped toxic waste onto our shores, completely destroying the livelihood of so many fishermen, killing countless fish and causing people who live by the sea to get cancer from the toxicity.
And whose fault was that? Not the bantus.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top