Loool, warya you need to learn more about the world. The muffazir dynasty is its name first. The imbecile who started this thread doesn't even know its first name. So his claim that they are many a books stating this, is already a doubtful statement. Point two walaal, the muffazir dynasty had a figurehead that would facilitate the control of the exporting of slaves. They had to to abide by the laws and rules of the iman of geledi and the ajuran.
Finally the most important point that can be reaffirm by many a African and non western historians is that this so called books, which are written by western have vested interest in depicting the history of poeple within the african continent in a negative light, or writing the very people within it, out of their own history, to accommodate their despicable view that they civilised Africa. Just as they stated that axum was an sabean culture to discredit Ethiopians, just as they are attempting to manipulate ancient egypt, to credit it to Europe. They are attempting the very same thing with somalia. Don't believe the bullshit. Arabs in somalia were nothing more than merchants. Not rulers but merchants who come over to interact and trade with native somalis