cunug3aad
3rdchild
in that they hear and disobey, and warp the diin. suuratul Baqara 93 wuu yiri Allaah tacaala
Then in aayah 285 wuu yiri
A believer proper shouldnt be concerned with trying to rectify or omit or reform parts of the diin to appeal to the gaalo, even worse the gaalo that arent going to revert anyways. I would add justification but it is a useful tool Only In A Proper Manner Where You Dont Corrupt The Diin. You can explaiin explain something but in the end, you take it how it is and accept it. For example nebi maxamed csw marriage to caasho and her age at the time. Main purpose of the marriage was to strengthen the tie between him and caasho's father abubakr, also it was a different time where unlike now, there was very minimal to learn to become an adult, and you had to grow up degdeg pace. Also if nebi was a predator astagfirulaah he would have more young wives no? but no she was the only one that young, the prophet had various ages as wives, at least one was a widow i believe, and his favourite khadiija was 15 years older than him and twice widow with previous children, so this marriage with caasho was purely political marriage.
(Also people who look that youthful especially males are warned against. males included because greek saqajaanimo influenced on arabs back then)
This is an example of a justification Within The Limits Of The Diin. An unnacceptable argument, however, is saying that caasho she was like 16 or 18 look at this hadiith extrapolate the dates and do caluclation smthsmth The saxiix bukhaari says she was 9 and that is what we accept. This is somewhat of a loaded example but there is also the example that some lost people mention "qawmuluut werent khaniis they were rapists it doesnt say homosexuality anywhere in the quraan" First off Doing the entering of house through the rear door if you catch my drift is Xaaraaan end of story, so it is already impossible to enter the house of a man who doesn't have a front door. Also The Quraanka kariimka literally says in suuratun naml 54 and 55:
The worst of them are the mans who just reject a hadiith or reinterpret an aayah they dont like. They warp the speech of Allaah and his rasuul to fit their agenda of appealing better to the gaalo and in doing so damage their aqiidah, and damaging the aqiidah is a dangerous road to go down. Its so dangerous that if you don't know how to approach topics in the diin in the correct way it is better for you not to approach them at all, lest you affirm a belief that takes you out of the fold of Islaam.
Similar to this actually is the stance taken on the kutub of ahlul kitaab in saxiix bukhaari 7362:
I dont really know how to end an essay so ill just say Islaam is a complete religion, it doesnt need fixing up like they did about a million times to christianity and yahuud, it needs people abiding by it by learning it specifically, not copying what everyone else does. We shouldbe the last people to never be jaahil.
And [recall] when We took your covenant and raised over you the mount, [saying], "Take what We have given you with determination and listen." They said [instead], "We hear and disobey." And their hearts absorbed [the worship/love of] the calf because of their disbelief. Say, "How wretched is that which your faith enjoins upon you, if you should be believers."
Then in aayah 285 wuu yiri
The Messenger has believed in what was revealed to him from his Lord, and [so have] the believers. All of them have believed in Allāh and His angels and His books and His messengers, [saying], "We make no distinction between any of His messengers." And they say, "We hear and we obey. [We seek] Your forgiveness, our Lord, and to You is the [final] destination."
A believer proper shouldnt be concerned with trying to rectify or omit or reform parts of the diin to appeal to the gaalo, even worse the gaalo that arent going to revert anyways. I would add justification but it is a useful tool Only In A Proper Manner Where You Dont Corrupt The Diin. You can explaiin explain something but in the end, you take it how it is and accept it. For example nebi maxamed csw marriage to caasho and her age at the time. Main purpose of the marriage was to strengthen the tie between him and caasho's father abubakr, also it was a different time where unlike now, there was very minimal to learn to become an adult, and you had to grow up degdeg pace. Also if nebi was a predator astagfirulaah he would have more young wives no? but no she was the only one that young, the prophet had various ages as wives, at least one was a widow i believe, and his favourite khadiija was 15 years older than him and twice widow with previous children, so this marriage with caasho was purely political marriage.
(Also people who look that youthful especially males are warned against. males included because greek saqajaanimo influenced on arabs back then)
This is an example of a justification Within The Limits Of The Diin. An unnacceptable argument, however, is saying that caasho she was like 16 or 18 look at this hadiith extrapolate the dates and do caluclation smthsmth The saxiix bukhaari says she was 9 and that is what we accept. This is somewhat of a loaded example but there is also the example that some lost people mention "qawmuluut werent khaniis they were rapists it doesnt say homosexuality anywhere in the quraan" First off Doing the entering of house through the rear door if you catch my drift is Xaaraaan end of story, so it is already impossible to enter the house of a man who doesn't have a front door. Also The Quraanka kariimka literally says in suuratun naml 54 and 55:
And Lot, when he said to his people, "Do you commit immorality while you are seeing? Do you indeed approach men with desire instead of women? Rather, you are a jaahil people."
The worst of them are the mans who just reject a hadiith or reinterpret an aayah they dont like. They warp the speech of Allaah and his rasuul to fit their agenda of appealing better to the gaalo and in doing so damage their aqiidah, and damaging the aqiidah is a dangerous road to go down. Its so dangerous that if you don't know how to approach topics in the diin in the correct way it is better for you not to approach them at all, lest you affirm a belief that takes you out of the fold of Islaam.
Similar to this actually is the stance taken on the kutub of ahlul kitaab in saxiix bukhaari 7362:
The people of the Book used to read the Tawraad in Hebrew and then explain it in Arabic to the Muslims. So Rasuulullaah SCW said [to the Muslims] "Do not accept [the speech of] the people of the Book as truth, nor allege them of lying, but say, {We believe in Allaah and whatever is revealed to us, and whatever is revealed to you.}"
I dont really know how to end an essay so ill just say Islaam is a complete religion, it doesnt need fixing up like they did about a million times to christianity and yahuud, it needs people abiding by it by learning it specifically, not copying what everyone else does. We should
"You worship not besides Him except names you have named them, you and your fathers, for which Allāh has sent down no authority [i.e. evidence]. Legislation is not but for Allāh. He has commanded that you worship not except Him. That is the correct Diin, but most of the people do not know."
