akhi why are u worried about the audience lol they can't do shit. Also, he's used mediators and translators before when debating people from other countries in front of an audience. He even debated an ustaz from Nigeria with a MUSLIM Nigerian translator.I prefer this format. Debater 1, Debator 2. Panel of 'non bias' different 'religion or no religions' as panel to review and score the content of the debate on both sides and provide an over-all result. Everything is measurable and put it before the crowd that this is the score of the debate and who won. That guy christian prince would no survive as his views are put before a 'jama'ah' consensus that is not related to him nor the other side but 'pure result' orientated using mechanism to determine quality of each point and answers.
PPL who leave Islam or any religion for that matter were full of doubts to begin with and seek an 'avenue' to confirm those doubts in order to solidify their position. Trust me, you not fooling me adeer. Reaching a conclusion and then finding evidence to support that conclusion is considered confirmation bias, it's not genuine attempts of research. Starting with I don't know like I used to be is considered the fair default position to start from and then researching evidence on both sides PRO and Against and weighing it up.
Also if u watch his previous debates with people there is no scoring for browny points. He debates a topic and reaches a conclusion. I'm just surprised at his vast knowledge of Arabic and Islam.
At the end of the day it;s ur choice if u wanna debate him or not. He live streams almost every day.