Are you Muslim?Just like Aisha said.
"I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires."
Are you Muslim?Just like Aisha said.
"I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires."
Are you Muslim?
My mentioning disgust is more directly relevant to incest than morality. Morality dictates what you believe is right or wrong behaviour. If you are talking about your own personal actions disgust can be a valid motivator, but when it comes to the behaviour of others it isn't, rationality alone is. If there are people committing incest that risks the result of producing a baby, yes it is morally wrong. That is rational, there is a clear and measurable negative consequence from that action. If they are using a form of birth control or are sterile, there is no clear negative consequence from that action. All that exists is disgust, the people committing incest however don't have that disgust and from their perspective it isn't morally wrong. My own disgust isn't enough for me to make them stop. It isn't morally wrong. There is no objective morality.Finding something disgusting or enjoyable doesn't dictate whether it's morally acceptable or not.
If I find fish to be disgusting does that mean it is haram?
In fact the question was how can an atheist deem it to be morally wrong, not whether you find it disgusting or not.
Nowhere in my posts have i attributed the disgust from incest to religion. Stop lying.
I asked if two consenting adults who happen to be brother and sister and who don't have the ability to produce offspring have intercourse with each other, is it morally wrong? If so provide evidence.
Your argument is not going to build up to a conclusion that answers the initial question. You're supposed to argue about the truth of Islam, not about its promotion of morality. I'm asking you about how you know Islam is the one true religion, your responses are asking about the morality about not being a Muslim. Even if that were the case that not being a Muslim meant being a amoral monster that doesn't prove the truth of Islam. It doesn't prove that Muhammad talked to an angel in the cave. You do understand the difference correct?
What is your position on this? Is it morally wrong?
What is your position on this? Is it morally wrong?
To be sincere, I don't know the answer to that question.My mentioning disgust is more directly relevant to incest than morality. Morality dictates what you believe is right or wrong behaviour. If you are talking about your own personal actions disgust can be a valid motivator, but when it comes to the behaviour of others it isn't, rationality alone is. If there are people committing incest that risks the result of producing a baby, yes it is morally wrong. That is rational, there is a clear and measurable negative consequence from that action. If they are using a form of birth control or are sterile, there is no clear negative consequence from that action. All that exists is disgust, the people committing incest however don't have that disgust and from their perspective it isn't morally wrong. My own disgust isn't enough for me to make them stop. It isn't morally wrong. There is no objective morality.
Answer my question. Is it a coincidence that you happened to be born into the one true religion?
You shouldn't be talking about religion then.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
So he married widows to help them out right? Because an unmarried woman living in 7th century Arabia couldn't manage on her own. (Nevermind about Khadija being able to pull it off before marrying Muhammad) So why is it that Muhammad prohibited others from marrying his widows after he himself dies? He had no problem marrying other men's widows but was opposed to others doing the same to him.
You shouldn't be talking about religion then.
Yes you do. You are a Muslim. You believe Islam is the one true religion. You being born into a Muslim family was sheer coincidence. You do understand the implication of this right? Your position right now is indistinguishable from the position countless people throughout human history have been in. Each and every one of them believing that the religion they were born into was the one true religion. Always ask why you believe in the things you do, justify them. Don't just blindly follow the religion of your parents. There is no evidence about Muhammad's account. The fact that it's indistinguishable from any other religion in terms of this is pretty telling about whether or not Muhammad was telling the truth.To be sincere, I don't know the answer to that question.
I've already told you that by posting this video I am not trying to prove Islam. No where in the question i posed is Islam even stated.Your argument is not going to build up to a conclusion that answers the initial question. You're supposed to argue about the truth of Islam, not about its promotion of morality. I'm asking you about how you know Islam is the one true religion, your responses are asking about the morality about not being a Muslim. Even if that were the case that not being a Muslim meant being a amoral monster that doesn't prove the truth of Islam. It doesn't prove that Muhammad talked to an angel in the cave. You do understand the difference correct?
Yes you absolutely have to provide evidence about Islam. Specifically that Muhammad really was being contacted by God. This is the foundation of your belief in Islam. The one and only thing that matters. If you didn't have this evidence, you wouldn't be a Muslim. Do you disagree with that statement? Since you are a Muslim, you therefore have evidence. I am requesting it from you.I've already told you that by posting this video I am not trying to prove Islam. No where in the question i posed is Islam even stated.
I've never claimed that because Islam promotes So and So that it is the one true religion. My only intention was to expose to the atheists on this platform the inherent flaws regarding their worldview.
Please know that at this point I am not ready to prove Islam to you. I am in the process of gathering my arguments and will hopefully give a complete answer shortly.
Your getting your emotions into this I can see, using words like cult, not fair and so on and so forth, the Prophets already have a higher status than I and you. They never missed prayers and try be sinless from the tiniest of sins. God has simply by his Qadar he chosen Prophet Muhammad other than John or Jack. A true prophet by your claim is based among the belief of Modern society, you knew the prophet lived for 23 years in a house made of mud and smaller than the other sahabah, you sayng there is not equality.So although it has no value to anyone today it's stuck in the Quran because it is after all from God himself. The Quran isn't getting rid of anything so that verse is still there like a dead tooth. Okay. So why did Muhammad marry widows himself? Their original husbands would have wanted them in the hereafter the same way Muhammad wanted his many wives in the hereafter on top of his eternal virgins. That doesn't sound fair to me. Plus this is the behaviour of cult leaders, a true prophet of god should avoid similarities with them. Taking multiple sex partners for himself while limiting it for others is the behaviour of Jim Jones and Joseph Smith.
The word cult leader is apt here. Keep in mind from the perspective of a Muslim Muhammad is a true prophet. His behaviour should be distinguishable from the behaviour of a cult leader. The more similar his behaviour is to a cult leader the more likely a reasonable person would think of him that way, instead of as a true prophet of God. Does that make sense?Your getting your emotions into this I can see, using words like cult, not fair and so on and so forth, the Prophets already have a higher status than I and you. They never missed prayers and try be sinless from the tiniest of sins. God has simply by his Qadar he chosen Prophet Muhammad other than John or Jack. A true prophet by your claim is based among the belief of Modern society, you knew the prophet lived for 23 years in a house made of mud and smaller than the other sahabah, you sayng there is not equality.
Before we get to your point, my question I need you to answer isThe word cult leader is apt here. Keep in mind from the perspective of a Muslim Muhammad is a true prophet. His behaviour should be distinguishable from the behaviour of a cult leader. The more similar his behaviour is to a cult leader the more likely a reasonable person would think of him that way, instead of as a true prophet of God. Does that make sense?
No. His behaviour being indistinguishable from that of cult leader doesn't affect whether he is a true prophet of God or not. It is the evidence that matters.The word cult leader is apt here. Keep in mind from the perspective of a Muslim Muhammad is a true prophet. His behaviour should be distinguishable from the behaviour of a cult leader. The more similar his behaviour is to a cult leader the more likely a reasonable person would think of him that way, instead of as a true prophet of God. Does that make sense?
You're right. There could be a real prophet of God that is totally indistinguishable from a fraud, that isn't impossible. The only problem being that it would be totally rational for us not to believe he was a real prophet. It would be totally rational for us to believe he was a fraud. If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks like a duck it probably is a duck.No. His behaviour being indistinguishable from that of cult leader doesn't affect whether he is a true prophet of God or not. It is the evidence that matters.
"The more similar his behaviour is to a cult leader the more likely a reasonable person would think of him that way, instead of as a true prophet of God."
That depends on the individuals perception of a true prophet God. Does that make sense?
Unless presented with evidence of course.You're right. There could be a real prophet of God that is totally indistinguishable from a fraud, that isn't impossible. The only problem being that it would be totally rational for us not to believe he was a real prophet. It would be totally rational for us to believe he was a fraud. If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks like a duck it probably is a duck.
Let me fix that then. There can be a true prophet whose behaviour is indistinguishable from a cult leader's. Now why would we believe one man who behaves like a cult leader but not another? Do you remember why I asked you if it was purely coincidental that you happened to be born into the one true religion? The answer to that question is the same answer to this one.Notice how I said behaviour.
I told you now that this guy is acting like a hypocrite because he hides his emotion with rationality that. The dp of the Kabah with pigeon xaar on the kabah to show his disrepect for muslims.Notice how I said behaviour.
In the post I stated "Evidence is all that matters". I also remember you stating that too.Let me fix that then. There can be a true prophet whose behaviour is indistinguishable from a cult leader's. Now why would we believe one man who behaves like a cult leader but not another? Do you remember why I asked you if it was purely coincidental that you happened to be born into the one true religion? The answer to that question is the same answer to this one.