The other map is even more embarrassing for the thread starter
The other map is even more embarrassing for the thread starter
If you weren't colonised, why did you gain independence 26th of June 1960?
View attachment 43159
I don't know why I keep seeing this fallacious claim going around that Somaliland wasn't colonized. Somaliland was obviously colonized by the British, same way the south was colonized by the Italians, and Djibouti was colonized by the French. However, there is definitely some truth to the idea that the British didn't care about Somaliland, they literally called us "Aden's Butchershop" after all. They didn't have much of a presence initially beyond few buildings in Berbera, and later Hargeisa, Borama and Burao.
Quotes from above article scan which is literally called "The colony that rejected freedom":
"Somaliland, eastern gateway to Dark Africa, was barely worth a sniff in the world's press until 3 days ago. Now it has become an area of national significance"
"Barren, barely hospitable, and pointless"![]()
daroods made the north relevant..
Warsangeli
![]()
![]()
People need to learn difference between a colony and a protectorate. Colonized means you were conquered and under direct control while protectorate means your a client state and not directly controlled since your an autonomous region and that you independently govern yourself.
I hope @XaawoLuul and @SomaliWadaniSoldier knows better now since historically the three Somaliland European states were not conquered but were client states so Yes, we were never colonized.
Colony: a country or area under the full or partial political control of another country, typically a distant one, and occupied by settlers from that country.
The term "colony" doesn't just imply political control, but also the settlement of outsiders by the imperial power:
Somaliland wasn't a colony for one simple reason: it was so barren and uninteresting that nobody wanted to settle there.
It wasn't like the South, which was coveted and remains coveted because of its rivers and pristine green farmlands.
But just because you weren't technically a colony doesn't mean you were free from imperial control. No, the Brittish termed you a "protectorate" because they had to protect your langaab assees from Sayid Abdullah Hassan and the dervishes. In exchange for their protection, you gave them tribute of sheep and goats for their soldiers in Yemen, and also s from fucking street for their enjoyment.
You arn't very intelligent are you? Just because a newspaper refers to Somaliland as a "colony" does not invalidate the entire Somaliland history and that the clans signed treaties with Britain which made it a Protectorate rather than a Colony. This was a smart business and security decision and at the time. There are even documents deposited at the United Nations confirming that Somaliland was a protectorate. Just in case you don't know what a treaty is
"A Treaty is a formally concluded and ratified agreement between states."
Instead of hating just because this thread refers to Somaliland, you should appreciate you Somali history. Somaliland was one of the few African countries that were never colonised. It was the first Somali territory to re-declare its independence when it signed a new Treaty Agreement with the UK. Somaliland will always be in Somaliland history for this reason.
![]()
Jeez these Somali Unionist Extremists are frothing at the mouth whenever Somaliland is mentioned. Somaliland history is undeniably. Ka nax oo naftaa waa
![]()