J1 in Habeshas is roughly 40%, I expected the Eriteria result to have higher percentage but it hovers between 9-11%.It seems that Arabian admixture in Ethiosemites was maternal and not paternal like we thought
View attachment 345279
J-P56 has high prevalence among the Habeshas. The Cushitic speakers received their Iron Age Arabian ancestry via females it seems as Arabian lineages are less common among us.It seems that Arabian admixture in Ethiosemites was maternal and not paternal like we thought
View attachment 345279
Pangani study is old.@Step a side @NidarNidar @Garaad Awal
@Shimbiris
Genetic experts I need some help. I found this study about Ethiopians and it says their Eurasian ancestry comes from the Levant and Anatolia with a Sardinian proxy.
That sounds like crazy since I'm 100% certain that Habeshas are just Cushites with some Arabian DNA. What are your thoughts?
I see so Arabian ancestry is basically Levantine + Anatolian which is a mix of Natufian farmers and Anatolian farmers I presume.Pangani study is old.
Arabs are mostly Levant-Neolithic (Anatolian 45%+ Natufian 55%) + Natufian related proper aka Arabian HG + Zagrosian.
Cushites west euroaian ancestry is similar but slightly less Levant Neolithic and negligible Zagrosian (introduced recently) and instead of Arabian HG they have Egyptian HG ancestry (both HG are closely related
Amhara would be mixture of the two (70% Cushites + 20% Arabian) + 10% Mota related.
We have Levant Neolithic which can be seen in certain models. I saw someone demonstrate this. I’m trying to get hold of it but I can’t seem to find it.I see so Arabian ancestry is basically Levantine + Anatolian which is a mix of Natufian farmers and Anatolian farmers I presume.
I know that Cushites were a Natufian-like population that originated from Egypt but I don't know how close they are to Neolithic Levantine.