Scholars, soo gala

[Libaaxseendheer]

It's different though because the allegorical relationships are much more ancient.

In terms of the northern Arab tribes, the Qedarites descended from Qedar son of Ismail they are fraternal with the following tribes:

Nabiit, founder of the Nabataeans
Cabdeel
Mabsam
Ciidamus
Masmoas
Masuas
Shudad
Timan
Jitur
Nefisus
Qedmas

The Nabataeans and Qedarites were the two main tribes with the children of the other sons being smaller tribes within the Nabataean and Qedarite tribes.

The Nabataeans and Qedarites had a distant connection to their allegorical "cousins" the tribes of Israel. Northern Arabs are much more closely related to Jews than the Arabs of Qahtan.
Amru ibn Aamir is also known in Arabian tradition as Muzaikiya a man who led the wandering Azd ancestors of Gassan (Jokshan or Kushan of the Midianites), Khazraj (Jazar), and Aus (Uz) from the area of Marib which is in truth the written about in the Exodus book 17 of the Hebrew Bible.
The icon of isreal and judeasim Moses peace upon himself was a qahtanite sabian. The table of nation of genesis is much much more allegorical than you have gleaned from your current studies.
For more infohttp://afroasiatics.blogspot.com/2013/06/canaanites-in-their-lands-part-2-afro.html?m=1
To find the common connection with Qahtan you have to go up many many allegorical generations. Qahtan is the son of Eber, who is Qedar's great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather.

At that point you're only about 4 generations from Shem and 5 from Nuux, and the allegory breaks down as Nuux is the ancestor of every single living person.

Essentially the southern Arabs and northern Arabs were not related, other than the extremely distant connection of both being Semitic people. Closer than Assyrians but much more distant than Jews, Moabites or Aramaeans.

Where do i start. All the children of noah
were black
"Shem was especially blessed black and beautiful
Ham was blessed black like the raven …”

The above written between the 1st to 2nd century AD by Rabbi Eli`ezer of Israel, from the Pirqe, pereq 24 – cited by Yafeu Taom ha Levi (
“From the great family of Cahlan (descendant of Cahtan) the Azdite branch supplied to Mecca the tribe of the Khaza’a, and to Medina the Aus and Khazraj AKA the ansar(raa). terms like qahtanites, isrealites and arab are very allegorical.
Amru ibn Aamir is also known in Arabian tradition as Muzaikiya a man who led the wandering Azd ancestors of Gassan (Jokshan or Kushan of the Midianites), Khazraj (Jazar), and Aus (Uz) from the area of Marib which is in truth the written about in the Exodus book 17 of the Hebrew Bible.
Amr muzaikiya of yemeni historians. The sabian qahtanite who lead his people from the dykes of arim is none other moses who lead the isrealites and defeated the cananites. Canaan is where theyre currently located and are known as azd and dawasir they are the ansar. And u guessed it kenaan is the name of a great valley just south of mecca.

 

[Defendant]

Why are Africans discriminated against in literally every corner across the globe?

Good question.

Dark skin has been vilified for centuries.

 

[Defendant]

The earliest dynasties of Ancient Egyptians in upper Egypt (southern Egypt) closely resembled and were related to Cushitic Kermans:


"The Predynastic populations studied here, from Naqada and Badari, are both Upper Egyptian samples, while the Dynastic Egyptian sample (Tarkhan) is from Lower Egypt. The Dynastic Nubian sample is from Upper Nubia (Kerma). Previous analyses of cranial variation found the Badari and Early Predynastic Egyptians to be more similar to other African groups than to Mediterranean or European populations (Keita, 1990; Zakrzewski, 2002). In addition, the Badarians have been described as near the centroid of cranial and dental variation among Predynastic and Dynastic populations studied (Irish, 2006; Zakrzewski, 2007). This suggests that, at least through the Early Dynastic period, the inhabitants of the Nile valley were a continuous population of local origin, and no major migration or replacement events occurred during this time.

Studies of cranial morphology also support the use of a Nubian (Kerma) population for a comparison of the Dynastic period, as this group is likely to be more closely genetically related to the early Nile valley inhabitants than would be the Late Dynastic Egyptians, who likely experienced significant mixing with other Mediterranean populations(Zakrzewski, 2002). A craniometric study found the Naqada and Kerma populations to be morphologically similar (Keita, 1990). Given these and other prior studies suggesting continuity (Berry et al., 1967; Berry and Berry, 1972), and the lack of archaeological evidence of major migration or population replacement during the Neolithic transition in the Nile valley, we may cautiously interpret the dental health changes over time as primarily due to ecological, subsistence, and demographic changes experienced throughout the Nile valley region."

Source:

Starling, JT Stock. (2007). Dental Indicators of Health and Stress in Early Egyptian and Nubian Agriculturalists: A Difficult Transition and Gradual Recovery. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY134:520–528

 

[Defendant]

Looks like we are actually related to pre-dynastic Egyptians, they are older than what we refer to as ancient Egyptians and are the founding fathers of the first Egyptian dynasty:

Craniometric analysis of Kerma fossils compared with various other early populations inhabiting the Nile Valley and Maghreb found that they were morphologically close to Predynastic Egyptians from Naqada (4000–3200 BC). Craniometric analysis of predynastic Naqada fossils found that they were closely related to other Afroasiatic-speaking populations inhabiting the Horn of Africa. The Kermans were also more distantly related to Dynastic Egyptians from Gizeh (323 BC–330 AD) and Predynastic Egyptian samples from Badari(4400–4000 BC), followed by the ancient Garamantes of Libya (900 BC-500 AD) and early osteological series from Algeria (1500 BC), Carthage in Tunisia (751 BC–435 AD), Soleb in Nubia (1575–1380 BC), and Ptolemaic dynasty-era samples from Alexandria in Egypt (323 BC–330 AD).

Dental trait analysis of Kerma fossils found that they were closely related to Afroasiatic-speaking populations inhabiting Northeast Africa and the Maghreb. Among the ancient populations, the Kerma people were nearest to the A-Group culture bearers and Kushpopulations in Upper Nubia, followed by the Meroitic, X-Group and Christian period inhabitants of Lower Nubia and the Kellispopulation in the Dakhla Oasis, as well as C-Group and Pharaonic era skeletons excavated in Lower Nubia and ancient Egyptians(Naqada, Badari, Hierakonpolis, Abydos and Kharga in Upper Egypt; Hawara in Lower Egypt). Among the recent groups, the Kermans were morphologically closest to Afroasiatic-speaking populations in the Horn of Africa, followed by the Shawia and KabyleBerber populations of Algeria as well as Bedouin groups in Morocco, Libya and Tunisia. The A-Group skeletons and these ancient and recent fossils were also phenotypically distinct from those belonging to recent Negroid populations in Sub-Saharan Africa.



Nikita, Efthymia, David Mattingly, Marta Mirazón Lahr (2012). "Three-dimensional cranial shape analyses and gene flow in North Africa during the Middle to Late Holocene" (PDF). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology.


Haddow, Scott Donald. "Dental Morphological Analysis of Roman Era Burials from the Dakhleh Oasis, Egypt". Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Retrieved 2 June 2017.

 

[Cam]

At one point Arabia had two races: Hamites (Cushities and Canaanites) and Semites like Arabs and Jews.
These are well attested facts. The Semites eventually took over and the indigenous "Hamites" (lazy/bs term) lost

Also Ishmailite Arabs descend from a Semite father and a Hamite mother as well. The African blood got diluted and you are what ur father is anyway