There's no point covering them as underages since they've had a role and witnessed Shukri's drowning.
Suspect 1 and Suspect 2 are the schoolgirls who bullied Shukri right?
Suspect 1 was in the river with Shukri and Suspect 2 paddled along , while the boys remained in the riverbank?
Suspect 3 couldn't swim and Suspect 4 thought the river was dirty
( Isn't that a contradictory itself since their intentions were go to the Riverside, despite Suspects 4 3 2 coincidently meeting with Suspect 1 and Shukri outside an arcade and all of a sudden late in the noon had plans to head to the river)
Suspect 1 left Shukri in her vulnerable position and swam towards nearby docks, meanwhile what was the other girl doing (Suspect 2) did she also swam away and watched
This news article doesn't add up it only highlights a smaller glimpse of the tragedy that took place.
What was the role of Suspect 2 notice how blank this article is when covering Suspect 2?
So suspect 4 does a Samaritan role , what was he doing , was he an accomplice to cover up their tracks by pretending to rescue etc
The entire story isn't clear more like rigged
This is likely to murder by drowning
Since Shukri was bullied in school and it have confirmed that Suspect 1 and 2 were her bullies, there could be another possibility , a link between Suspect 3 and 4 were her bullies but 4 insists that he never met Shukri before , maybe he"coincidently" knew her and was her bully .
AUN to Shukri , may she be in a better place , she didn't deserve to die like this.