Sharmake Ali Saleh, governor of Berbera, Zeila and Tadjoura 1833-1861

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sharmake Ali Saleh 1797-1861

NOTE: This period is a bit iffy, technically the sahil was part of the ottoman empire through the egyptian Khedivate, but the ottomans had little control over the Egyptians and the Egyptians had little control of the Somalis.

Little is known how Sharmaarke ook over the administration of Berbera. But by 1843 when Lieut. Curttenden visited Somaliland Sharmaarke was the governor of Berbera. A decade earlier when Frederic Forbes visited Berbera in 1833 Sharmaarke was well established on the Somali coast.

" In 1842 the Sheriff of Mocha subjected himself and his possession including Zeila, to the Porte; he was made Ottoman pasha of western Arabia, and Zeila theoretically returned to Turkey. On the spot however, the situation was more complex for in 1843 Haji Shirmarke from Berbera sized Zeila, imprisoned the Shariff's garrison and offered to put the port under British protection ; the government of India rejected the offer on the ground that Aden was merely a depot for coals and that any intervention in the affairs of the African coast would be expensive and unprofitable and might excite the jealousy of other European powers. Shirmarke object seems to have been to make himself ruler of the Somali coast; finding that the British would not serve his purpose he apparently submitted as a governor of Zeila to the Turks who dismissed Shariff's Hussain and occupied Mocha in 1849. He intrigued with the Turks to get Berbera placed under the Turkish flag, but with no result."


“The Governor of Zaila, El Hajj Shermarkay bin Ali Salih, is rather a remarkable man. He is sixteenth, according to his own account, in descent from Ishak El Hazrami, the saintly founder of the great Garhajis and Awal tribes. Originally the Nacoda, or Captain of the native craft, he has raised himself, chiefly by British influence, to the chieftainship of his tribe (a clan of the Habr Garhajis). As early as May 1825, he received from Captain Bagnold, then our Resi- dent at Mocha, a testimonial and a reward for a severe sword wound in the left arm, received whilst defending the lives of English seamen. He went afterwards to Bombay, where he was treated with consideration; and about fifteen years ago he succeeded the Sayyid Mohamud El Barr as Governor of Zaila and its dependencies, under the Ottoman Pasha in Western Arabia.” "“The climate of Zaila is cooler than that of Aden, and the site being open all round, it is not so unhealthy. Many spare rooms and enclosed by the town walls. Zaila commands the adjacent harbour of Tajurrah, and is by position and northern part of Aussa (the ancient capital of Adel)and Harar, and of southern Abyssinia. It sends caravans northwards to the Dankali, and south-westwards through and the Easa and Gadabursi tribes, as far as Efat and Gurague. It is visited by Kafilas from Abyssinia, and the different races of Bedouins extending from the hills to and sea-board. The exports are valuable slaves, ivory, hides, honey, clarified butter and gums: the coast around the sponge, coral, and small pearls, which Arab go about in the fair season. In the harbour I found about native craft, large and small; of these, ten belonged to the Governor. They trade with Berbera, Arabia, and Western India and are navigated by “Rajpoot” or Hindoo pilots."

@oday1kenobi @The Cushtic One @waraabe @merka @ethan bradberry

@Duke of Bohol what do you think of Isaaq Al Hazrami instead of Al hashimi? Also a Garxajis ruling berbera to the eritrean border :denzelnigga:
 
I swear I was going to make a thread about this legendary leader.

I did touch on him in @SultanuuFicaan thread about the 19th century baardheer jihad:

In the north, we have garxajis/hy merchant and leader, Haji sharmarke, forcibly taking control of Zeila with the use of canon + support from hy/gx musketeers and even a contemporary report from Richard Burton clearly shows that he was more influential/powerful than the sultan of Harar (who was actually intimidated by sharmarke) and he had plans to take control of the prosperous/busy port of Berbera.

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/...ent-geledi-wars-of-expansion-1846-1878.23856/
 
Merka is correct, Hazrami is probably a mistransliteration of the arabic ضر . So this can solidify the claim that Isaaq was not banu hashim, but a man from Yemen.

@waraabe do not worry walaal, I have reinstated isaaqnimo:siilaanyosmile:
There's lots of Banu Hashim in Yemen, especially in Hadramaut :siilaanyosmile:
 

Rooble

Suldaanka Gobyare
VIP
I swear I was going to make a thread about this legendary leader.

I did touch on him in @SultanuuFicaan thread about the 19th century baardheer jihad:

In the north, we have garxajis/hy merchant and leader, Haji sharmarke, forcibly taking control of Zeila with the use of canon + support from hy/gx musketeers and even a contemporary report from Richard Burton clearly shows that he was more influential/powerful than the sultan of Harar (who was actually intimidated by sharmarke) and he had plans to take control of the prosperous/busy port of Berbera.

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/...ent-geledi-wars-of-expansion-1846-1878.23856/
He was put there by the Turkish Governor of Mocha and Hodeida

q62Sxq8.png


4XLPSCL.png


and then deposed by the Turks. He didn't conquer it.
 
What is it with isaaqs and claiming people's land and history :hmm:

This one guy who didn't even conquer anything ayaad nooga sheekaynisaa. "Forcibly taking control of Zeila" kulahaa :ftw9nwa:
 
He was put there by the Turkish Governor of Mocha and Hodeida

q62Sxq8.png


4XLPSCL.png


and then deposed by the Turks. He didn't conquer it.

Perhaps he 'conquered' the town on behalf of the Turks?

B7ZrdRN_d.jpg

"these attended to - they included the fitting out of a force of fifty Somalis with muzzle loading guns and two cannon -Sharmarki chartered
two dhows and returned with his army to Zeila. This time nothing would induce him to go away. There was a violent argument which
Sharmarki settled by loading up his two cannon to the muzzle with powder and sand and firing them close to the walls of the town.
Syyed and his followers , who have never heard anything like this tremendous explosions made by these guns in their lives before,
became afraid and run away. Sharmarki entered the town in triumph"


Also guys, here are some excerpts I've found from Richard Burtons travels:

"Fears of the English, Turks, and the Hajj Sharmarke"
IMG_20170526_194622.jpg


His ambitions:
IMG_20170526_195117.jpg


And his somali spy in harar that was killed so he pressured the King of Shoa to detain 300 Harari citizens in his domain:
IMG_20170526_195038.jpg


So despite working for the Turks, it's clear that this man did in fact have clout and major influence in the region.
 
Last edited:

Rooble

Suldaanka Gobyare
VIP
Perhaps he 'conquered' the town on behalf of the Turks?

View attachment 19381
"these attended to - they included the fitting out of a force of fifty Somalis with muzzle loading guns and two cannon -Sharmarki chartered
two dhows and returned with his army to Zeila. This time nothing would induce him to go away. There was a violent argument which
Sharmarki settled by loading up his two cannon to the muzzle with powder and sand and firing them close to the walls of the town.
Syyed and his followers , who have never heard anything like this tremendous explosions made by these guns in their lives before,
became afraid and run away. Sharmarki entered the town in triumph"


Also guys, here are some excerpts I've found from Richard Burtons travels:

"Fears of the English, Turks, and the Hajj Sharmarke"
View attachment 19382

His ambitions:
View attachment 19383

And his somali spy in harar who got locked up so he pressured the King of Shoa to lock up 300 Harari citizens of his domain:
View attachment 19384

Yes it was orchestrated by the Turks.

1848 he was appointed by the Turks, In July 1855 replaced and sent in exile to Aden.
This source below was taken from the Royal Geographical Society (Great Britain) written in 1 January 1885 which states in 1848 Zaylac was under the dominion of the Turks.

Yzx3OEs.png


The historical dictionary of Djibouti also mentions Turkish presence at Zeila.
A Pasha was present, the governor he appointed worked underneath him.
Afterwards Egyptians administered the town, and with the Port of Djibouti rapidly expanding, Zeila declined and became small.

uyQxY8e.png



Zeila was under the dominion of the Turks and way eyed upon by the Superpowers at that time, British, French, Ottoman etc.+Egyptian. Sharmarke was appointed by the Turks in 1848, then disposed of in 1855. He was under their control, after being disposed of he was forced to live in exile in Aden and pay the Turks a fine.
 
Yes it was orchestrated by the Turks.

1848 he was appointed by the Turks, In July 1855 replaced and sent in exile to Aden.
This source below was taken from the Royal Geographical Society (Great Britain) written in 1 January 1885 which states in 1848 Zaylac was under the dominion of the Turks.

Yzx3OEs.png


The historical dictionary of Djibouti also mentions Turkish presence at Zeila.
A Pasha was present, the governor he appointed worked underneath him.
Afterwards Egyptians administered the town, and with the Port of Djibouti rapidly expanding, Zeila declined and became small.

uyQxY8e.png



Zeila was under the dominion of the Turks and way eyed upon by the Superpowers at that time, British, French, Ottoman etc.+Egyptian. Sharmarke was appointed by the Turks in 1848, then disposed of in 1855. He was under their control, after being disposed of he was forced to live in exile in Aden and pay the Turks a fine.

Thanks for clearing that up sxb.

Perhaps the Turks expected Sharmarke to run the ports of Berbera, Zeila, and Tadjoura as they wished but gave him autonomy to do as he wished in the Somali interior hence his activities against the Hararis?
 
Thanks for clearing that up sxb.

Perhaps the Turks expected Sharmarke to run the ports of Berbera, Zeila, and Tadjoura as they wished but gave him autonomy to do as he wished in the Somali interior hence his activities against the Hararis?

Wasn't the capital of Ottoman Somaliland in Harar? that is of course, after the decline of Zeila?
 
Wasn't the capital of Ottoman Somaliland in Harar? that is of course, after the decline of Zeila?

I thought that was the khedive Egyptians who took control of Harar and made it their capital?

Although, the khedive were (nominally) vassals of the Ottoman empire.

Edit: you already answered me in your OP
This period is a bit iffy, technically the sahil was part of the ottoman empire through the egyptian Khedivate, but the ottomans had little control over the Egyptians and the Egyptians had little control of the Somalis
 
Last edited:

Young Popeye

Call me pops
Perhaps he 'conquered' the town on behalf of the Turks?

View attachment 19381
"these attended to - they included the fitting out of a force of fifty Somalis with muzzle loading guns and two cannon -Sharmarki chartered
two dhows and returned with his army to Zeila. This time nothing would induce him to go away. There was a violent argument which
Sharmarki settled by loading up his two cannon to the muzzle with powder and sand and firing them close to the walls of the town.
Syyed and his followers , who have never heard anything like this tremendous explosions made by these guns in their lives before,
became afraid and run away. Sharmarki entered the town in triumph"


Also guys, here are some excerpts I've found from Richard Burtons travels:

"Fears of the English, Turks, and the Hajj Sharmarke"
View attachment 19382

His ambitions:
View attachment 19383

And his somali spy in harar that was killed so he pressured the King of Shoa to detain 300 Harari citizens in his domain:
View attachment 19384

So despite working for the Turks, it's clear that this man did in fact have clout and major influence in the region.

why am i not surprised he targeted random clan affiliates to get even. :pachah1:
 
I thought that was the khedive Egyptians who took control of Harar and made it their capital?

Although, the khedive were (nominally) vassals of the Ottoman empire.

Edit: you already answered me in your OP

Yeah but when did Harar become more important then Saylac?
 

Young Popeye

Call me pops
I thought that was the khedive Egyptians who took control of Harar and made it their capital?

Although, the khedive were (nominally) vassals of the Ottoman empire.

Edit: you already answered me in your OP

khedive were an Albanian ruling class in egypt. Egyptian invasion was necessary, or Harar would fall to Oromo.
 
khedive were an Albanian ruling class in egypt. Egyptian invasion was necessary, or Harar would fall to Oromo.

Sadly, the Egyptians left to focus on the Sudanese Mahdist's and the British filled the gap left behind in the Northern Somali coast which meant you guys were left to fight against the Abyssinians (who were supplied by the west) in the fateful Battle of Chelenqo, 1887.

AUN to all who perished.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top