Somali Kings and Rulers of India you never knew about.

maharaja.jpg

dalip.jpg

Khan.jpg

Mysore.jpg

Mughal_3.jpg

Mughal_1.jpg
 

killerxsmoke

2022 GRANDMASTER
THE PURGE KING
VIP
Nigga stop the bullshit and just go f*ck yourself. You really managed to ruin my day but I do ha e to say thank you for reminding me that stupid somalis still exists
 
Even if this was true, would you claim them as somalis?
If they claimed they where somalis and they actually where ethnic somalis then who am I to say anything about there somalinimo but these guys are not somali and don't even look somali and somalis where really only present in India like Indians where present in somalia. As merchants. Some horners did become political figure though but that was because they rose up from the position of slaves there. I guess we where king makers since those slaves probably sold by somalis like malik Amber.
 
Last edited:

Som

VIP
There was certainly an African presence in India mainly Bantu slaves but also slaves from the horn ( Oromo). The only prominent African ruler we know of in India is Malik Ambar who was a former Oromo slave who grew to become a minister and one of the most important political and military leaders in muslim india
 

Som

VIP
The only evidence we have of somalis in India is recent and is mainly traders who settled there. That's it
 
Even if this was true, would you claim them as somalis?
Because the source says so and it's quite well documented. Somalis went there with slaves they brought from Uganda to the Mughal Kings and they got involved in law making there and climbed up the hierarchy ladder. And before the Mughals arrived at the India subcontinent we had the Hilaale dynasty in Maldives which was established by the Ajuuraan Empire's traders and travelers as a trade and slave colony in the Indian Ocean. Somalis have been so active in the Indian subcontinent for so long. Even most researchers say that Dravidians migrated from east Africa to the Indian subcontinent less than 500-300 years ago.

This articles can give you an idea but they're confusing slaves with the merchants who brought them there. Bantu slaves never made to the ruling class and are still living in slums in Gujarat India. You can clearly see who's Cushitic and who's not. This article's probably written by a white-apologetic or an AA Afrocentric claiming every empire in Africa as Bantu's. They're trying to cover up the slavery status of their fellow Bantus by using the achievement of Somalis and depicting Somalis as slaves in the process when in fact they were not.
What do you expect from the people who say Ancient Egypt was Bantu? Lol.

''East Africans'' means Somalis, because the guys in the pics look like Cushitic and no other Cushitic people other than Somalis had been involved in the corrupt business of slavery thanks to the Indian Ocean and cities like Mogadishu and Qandala and colonies like Maldives and Mozambique. Ethiopians never made to the seas, they've been mainlanders their whole life. So Ajuuraan and Majeertinia empires ALONE could've been involved in such a business and brought Slaves to the Mughals. They were respectable merchants that's why they easily involved in the government and made to generals, rulers and governors as they already had the bases.
It's like when someone says ''European explorers'', you already know that they mean either Portuguese or Spanish explorers.
 
There was certainly an African presence in India mainly Bantu slaves but also slaves from the horn ( Oromo). The only prominent African ruler we know of in India is Malik Ambar who was a former Oromo slave who grew to become a minister and one of the most important political and military leaders in muslim india
Oromos taken as slaves by the Somali slave traders seems very plausible. But you had to have someone going into mainland Africa and bringing them slaves over to the shores and ports. And Somalis mainly Ajuuraan Empire did so.
 
W

Who are they then? Keep your head up dude and have some Dadnimo in you. Stop trying to burry your ancestors history and achievements.
No You don't understand most if not all of the prominent horners or bantus in Indian history got there because they where slaves. merchants which is the case for somalis presence there didn't get access to high society only ambassador/diplomats did like said of Mogadishu. The slaves how ever where used in civil service or in there wars so could actually climb Indian societies ladders.

Somalis for the most part where the main sellers of said slaves and somalis were not selling themselves It was generally those we where at war with around us that we would sell.

Plus deccan region is south Indian they basically look east african in general so you can't say there somali or even African if there is no source to back it up. Siddis are not somali but some somalis may have become a part of that community due to settling in India but those are few in number. Siddi dna show they are mainly bantu, ethiopian and Indian.

So maybe there is a chance that these guys could have a fraction of somali blood in them but when did somalis accept mixed people as there own?

Bring sources or don't post this type of stuff.

(The Maldives is an exception because we have sources but even then there royal families orgins is somali but they basically mixed themselves out into there populace there was no mass migration there or any mixing and those that may have settled there have mixed out)
 
Last edited:

ZBR

سبحان اللهِ وبحمدِه Free Palestine
There was Oromo man born in the Ajuran Empire that was kingmaker and general in india
 

ZBR

سبحان اللهِ وبحمدِه Free Palestine
India did have Cushitic rulers but only in certain areas
 

Trending

Top