Somalia must end contact with salafi countries

[Prince of Lasanod]

 

[MrProfessor]

Of course I'm not a salafi but I want to get some things straightened out. A salafi is someone who follows the way of the first 3 generations of Muslims because they believe they practiced the purest of Islam. They're not wrong. Shafi, Hanbali, Hanafi and Maliki are followed by the Salafi as they fall under the category of the first 3 generations. They tend to favour the Hanbali though who was the strictest in interpretation.

The Ottoman Empire was taken down by the secularists movements within mainland Turkey.

The Ottomans introduced many unislamic laws, they decriminalised homosexuality, revoked Jizya and apostasy law and even outlawed slavery which continued in Arab/Muslim countries till the 60s. The Ottoman Empire, in my opinion, was a force for good.

Also, the Arabs revolted against the Ottomans because they were nationalists. They had Arab nationalist goals. The Ottomans, as far they were concerned, were foreigners.

I despise them but it seems we despise them for different reasons.

I know what a salaf is kiddo, I don't need an atheist explaining my religion to me. It's amazing wallahi how atheists don't believe Islam is right but they claim that the true Islam is the Islam followed by Wahabis and Terrorists; irony at its finest, they can't help the bias from spewing out.
And as for what you said about the 4 madhabs being under Salafi, you are completely and utterly wrong. Every single salafi scholar claims that the only true path is the Salafi path. plus Salafism is a madhab itself, so you sound fucking retarded if you are saying that Salafis are other Madhabs as well as their own.
It's not like Sufism because Sufism isn't a Madbah but a tariqa which is purely spiritual and has nothing to do Fiqh, that's why Sufi's belong to every madhab.

As for the Ottomans being unislamic you are again fucking wrong, because the ottomans started to act western during their downfall in the 20th century, after the british started meddling in their affairs.

Again you are a lying about the Arabs revolting because of purely nationalism. It was only the Wahabi Saudis in Hijaz that revolted against the ottoman empire, why didn't all the other Arab countries revolt if it was purely Nationalism as you claim. The British went to the Saudis in the first place precisely because they were wahabis and went to war with the ottomans before, it was even called the Ottoman-Wahabi war. The Wahabis revolted; well because they are wahabis and considered everyone Mushriks, the Ottomans won that war and executed hundreds of prominent Salafi scholars.
The British knowing this went to the Saudis in WW1 and Funded the living shit out of them to revolt against the Ottomans, which they did and won with the help of the British.

It's funny how Wahabis hate westerners so much but they wouldn't fucking exists if they didn't lick the ass of the westerners that they claim to hate on multiple occasions. To this day they are licking their ass